Modular disturbance observer based constrained PI-controller design

The paper deals with modular design of constrained disturbance observer (DO) based PI control with different filtering properties. After treating possible effects of control constraints completing deeper analysis of the core structure of the P controller with different types of additional dynamics approximations [1], it will be expanded by considering structures of constrained PI1 controllers, in which the integral action is introduced as the DO based load (input disturbance) reconstruction and compensation using inversion of the plant dynamics. In the nominal case, for suppressing measurement and quantization noise different DO filters may be used without necessity to repeat for the new structure analysis of the optimal and critical P controller tuning. So, by simple means, open and flexible approach offering reasonably better performance than the traditional PI control is achieved. Thereby, the loop performance is evaluated by measuring deviations from strictly monotonic (MO) and one-pulse (1P) transients typical for plants with dominant first order dynamics [1], as illustrated by example of speed servo control using incremental encoder.

[1]  Peter Hippe Windup in Control: Its Effects and Their Prevention , 2006 .

[2]  Evanghelos Zafiriou,et al.  Robust process control , 1987 .

[3]  Mikulás Huba,et al.  Modular Approach to Teaching PID Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Yoichi Hori,et al.  Robust speed control of DC servomotors using modern two degrees-of-freedom controller design , 1991 .

[5]  Kouhei Ohnishi,et al.  Microprocessor-Controlled DC Motor for Load-Insensitive Position Servo System , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Mikuláš Huba,et al.  Two Dynamical Classes of PI-Controllers for the 1st Order Loops , 1997 .

[7]  Kouhei Ohnishi,et al.  Motion control for advanced mechatronics , 1996 .

[8]  Mikuláš Huba,et al.  Setpoint Versus Disturbance Responses of the IPDT Plant , 2012 .

[9]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  The Reaction Wheel Pendulum , 2007, The Reaction Wheel Pendulum.

[10]  Mikuláš Huba Computer Design of Robust I-controller , 2011 .

[11]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Advanced PID Control , 2005 .

[12]  D. Luenberger Observers for multivariable systems , 1966 .

[13]  Pavol Bistak,et al.  PREDICTIVE ANTI WINDUP PI AND PID CONTROLLERS BASED ON I1- AND I2 MODELS WITH DEAD TIME , 1999 .

[14]  Jay C. Hsu,et al.  Modern Control Principles and Applications , 1968 .

[15]  Raymond Hanus,et al.  Anti-windup, bumpless, and conditioned transfer techniques for PID controllers , 1996 .

[16]  Mikulás Huba Open flexible P-controller design , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC).

[17]  G. Schneider Was du heut' nicht kannst besorgen, das verschiebe halt auf morgen / Put off till tomorrow what you cannot do today , 1986 .

[18]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[19]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[20]  Adolf Hermann Glattfelder,et al.  Control Systems with Input and Output Constraints , 2003 .

[21]  Mikuláš Huba,et al.  Robust Controller Tuning for Integral Dead Time Systems , 2010 .

[22]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Robust digital tracking controller design for high-speed positioning systems , 1996 .

[23]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A common framework for anti-windup, bumpless transfer and reliable designs , 2002, Autom..