A non-linear model of information seeking behaviour

This paper offers a new, Nonlinear Model of Information Seeking Behaviour, which contrasts with earlier stage models of information behaviour and represents a potential cornerstone for a shift towards a new perspective for understanding user information behaviour. The model is based on the findings of a study on interdisciplinary informationseeking behaviour. The study followed a naturalistic inquiry approach using interviews of 45 academics. The interview results were inductively analysed and an alternative framework for understanding information seeking behaviour was developed. This model illustrates three core processes and three levels of contextual interaction, each composed of several individual activities and attributes. These interact dynamically through time in a nonlinear manner. The behavioural patterns are analogous to an artist’s palette, in which activities remain available throughout the course of information seeking. In viewing the processes in this way, neither start, nor finish points are fixed, and each process may be repeated, or lead to any other until either the query or context determine that information seeking can end. The interactivity and shifts described by the model show information seeking to be nonlinear, dynamic, holistic, and flowing. The paper offers four main implications of the model as it applies to existing theory and models, requirements for future research and the development of information literacy curricula. Central to these implications are the creation of a new nonlinear perspective from which user information seeking can be interpreted. NONLINEAR INFORMATION-SEEKING 3 A NONLINEAR MODEL OF INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIOUR Information-seeking behaviour research has contributed to developments in information literacy and skills training, electronic resources, virtual libraries, and traditional resources. Much of our understanding derives from research, yet in some contexts, such as interdisciplinary information seeking, the prevalence of models based on single-discipline researchers, and the assumptions that arise from them, may act to inhibit the development of further understanding and development. This paper describes research leading to a Nonlinear Model of Interdisciplinary Information-seeking Behaviour with potentially wider implications for studies of information behaviour.

[1]  Susan Dunman,et al.  Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services , 1996 .

[2]  Julie Thompson Klein Interdisciplinary Needs: The Current Context , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[3]  Allen Foster,et al.  Interdisciplinary information seeking behaviour : a naturalistic inquiry , 2003 .

[4]  Brian Detlor,et al.  Information Seeking on the Web: An Integrated Model of Browsing and Searching , 2000, First Monday.

[5]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Learning About the Information Seeking of Interdisciplinary Scholars and Students , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[6]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  A behavioral model of information seeking on the web: preliminary results of a study of how managers and IT specialists use the web , 1998 .

[7]  James R. Davis Interdisciplinary Courses and Team Teaching: New Arrangements for Learning , 1995 .

[8]  D. Spanner,et al.  Border Crossings: Understanding the Cultural and Informational Dilemmas of Interdisciplinary Scholars , 2001 .

[9]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[10]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[12]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Structures and Strategies of Interdisciplinary Science , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[14]  C. Palmer Practices and conditions of boundary crossing research work : a study of scientists at an interdisciplinary institute , 1996 .

[15]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research and Information Overload , 1996, Library Trends.

[16]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness , 1988, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process , 2001 .

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[19]  A. Parry Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[20]  Laura M. Bartolo,et al.  Interdisciplinary Work and the Information Search Process: A Comparison of Manual and Online Searching , 1993 .

[21]  Frederick W. Stoss Environment online: The greening of databases , 1991 .

[22]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Interdisciplinary Information Seeking in Women's Studies , 1998 .

[23]  Bering Sea,et al.  Interdisciplinary Studies of the , 1999 .

[24]  Gloria J. Leckie,et al.  Modeling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers , 1996, The Library Quarterly.

[25]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[26]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  The importance of SDI for current awareness in fields with severe scatter of information , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking information seeking and searching processes , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[29]  L. Bickman,et al.  Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods , 1998 .

[30]  Tom Wilson,et al.  Information behaviour: an inter-disciplinary perspective , 1997 .

[31]  Karen E. Pettigrew,et al.  A general model of the information seeking of professionals: role theory through the back door? , 1997 .

[32]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  Understanding Statistics: An Introduction for the Social Sciences , 1997 .

[33]  B. Dervin AN OVERVIEW OF SENSE-MAKING RESEARCH: CONCEPTS, METHODS AND RESULTS TO DATE , 1983 .

[34]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.

[35]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  L.J.B. Mote,et al.  REASONS FOR THE VARIATIONS IN THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF SCIENTISTS , 1962 .

[37]  Frederick W. Stoss,et al.  Environment Online: The Greening of Databases. Part 1. General Interest Databases [and] Environmental Terms and Phrases: A Suggested List. , 1991 .

[38]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[39]  Anton J. Kuzel,et al.  Standards of trustworthiness for qualitative studies in primary care. , 1991 .

[40]  Brian Detlor,et al.  Information seeking on the Web , 2000 .

[41]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Towards a theoretical framework for information retrieval in an information seeking context , 1999 .