Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access

Four experiments are reported exploring whether distractor pictures activate their phonological properties in the course of speech production. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with two pictures and were asked to name one while ignoring the other. Distractor pictures were phonologically related, semantically related or unrelated to the target picture. Naming latencies were faster in the phonologically related condition (the phonological facilitation effect—PFE) than in the unrelated condition. No difference between semantically related and unrelated distractors was observed. In Experiment 2, participants were asked to name the color in which a picture was presented while ignoring the depicted object. Naming latencies were faster when colors and objects were phonologically related. In Experiments 3 and 4, the PFE was replicated under slightly different experimental conditions. Together, these results reveal that distractor pictures that are irrelevant to the communicative intention of the speaker activate their phonological content. This observation supports the notion that activation flows in a cascaded manner through the speech production system.

[1]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[2]  B. Rapp,et al.  Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. , 2000, Psychological review.

[3]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[4]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[7]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  A. Mack.  Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[10]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. , 1975 .

[11]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming from pictures , 1999, Cognition.

[12]  W. Levelt,et al.  Lexical access in the production of pronouns , 1999, Cognition.

[13]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[14]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production , 2005, Brain and Language.

[16]  R. R. Peterson,et al.  Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. , 1998 .

[17]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Constraint, Word Frequency, and the Relationship between Lexical Processing Levels in Spoken Word Production , 1998 .

[18]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[19]  Sylvia A. A. Van Den Boogaard,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access , 2004 .

[20]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[21]  H. Pashler,et al.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Expe: An expandable programming language for on-line psychological experiments , 1997 .

[23]  D. Simons.  Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Semantic negative priming in picture categorization and naming , 2000, Cognition.

[25]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[26]  Victor S Ferreira,et al.  Phonological Influences on Lexical (Mis)Selection , 2003, Psychological science.

[27]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[29]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[30]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production , 2001 .

[33]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production : Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms , 1998 .

[34]  C. Frith,et al.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. , 1999, Science.

[35]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[36]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[39]  Albert Costa,et al.  Lexical Selection in Bilinguals: Do Words in the Bilingual's Two Lexicons Compete for Selection? , 1999 .

[40]  W J Levelt,et al.  Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Picture Naming in Picture Context: Semantic Interference or Semantic Facilitation? , 2003 .

[42]  Albert Costa,et al.  Manipulating inattentional blindness within and across sensory modalities , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[44]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. , 1995 .

[45]  G. Dell,et al.  Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: a comment on Levelt et al. (1991). , 1991, Psychological review.

[46]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[47]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[48]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .