Is a website known by the banner ads it hosts?

While marketers often rely upon banner ads to generate revenues, it is unclear as to how these ads might influence consumer perceptions of host websites. In this paper, we conduct three studies to examine the effect of animation and brand advertised in a banner ad on consumers’ attitude towards a host website, as well as word-of-mouth behaviour. Results of the first study reveal that consumers are irritated with unfavourable banner brands and that irritation, in turn, negatively affects their attitude towards the host website. We demonstrate that banner brand and banner type serve as contextual cues that influence judgements of the host website due to a forward spillover effect. Findings of the second study demonstrate that a host website, corol- larily, serves as a context to negatively influence evaluations of favourable brands mainly for animated banner ads - a reciprocal spillover effect. The third study validates and extends the findings of the first study by adopting methodological pluralism through a different approach to stimuli selection and experimental manipulation. Results indicate that, while presence of animation has a negative influence on the host site and WOM behaviour when the brand advertised is an unfavourable one, it neither benefits nor hurts a host website evaluation and WOM behaviour when a favourable brand is advertised. Managerial implications of our findings are also discussed.

[1]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[2]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[3]  D. Fuchs.  Two Source Effects in Magazine Advertising , 1964 .

[4]  D. Aaker,et al.  Causes of Irritation in Advertising , 1985 .

[5]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Consumer attitudes and interactive digital advertising , 2009 .

[6]  John Boyd,et al.  The rise of intrusive online advertising and the response of user experience research at Yahoo! , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[7]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[8]  S. Thota.  What irritates consumers?: an empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of consumer irritation , 2004 .

[9]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[10]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies , 1993 .

[11]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  M. Cowles,et al.  On the Origins of the .05 Level of Statistical Significance , 1982 .

[13]  R. Winer.  New Communications Approaches in Marketing: Issues and Research Directions , 2009 .

[14]  Steven Jay Lynn,et al.  Contrast effects and their relationship to subsequent behavior , 1978 .

[15]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  A Peek into the Future of Interactive Marketing , 2009 .

[16]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  The Role of Interpersonal Sources in External Search: an Informational Perspective , 1984 .

[17]  Bernard L. Simonin,et al.  Is a Company Known by the Company it Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes , 1998 .

[18]  M. Cowles,et al.  On the Origins of the . 05 Level of Statistical Significance , 2005 .

[19]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Waiting for the Web: How Screen Color Affects Time Perception , 2004 .

[20]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten , 2005, TCHI.

[21]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  A Two-Factor Explanation of Assimilation and Contrast Effects , 1993 .

[22]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Impact Of Content And Design Elements On Banner Advertising Click-Through Rates , 2003 .

[23]  Arnold B. Bakker,et al.  “Stay Tuned—We Will Be Back Right after these Messages”: Need to Evaluate Moderates the Transfer of Irritation in Advertising , 2001 .

[24]  David A. Aaker,et al.  Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact. , 1990 .

[25]  Hairong Li,et al.  Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads , 2002 .

[26]  A. Stanaland,et al.  The impact of surfer/seeker mode on the effectiveness of website characteristics , 2010 .

[27]  Mohamed Saber Chtourou,et al.  Effects of configuration and exposure levels in responses to web advertisements , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[28]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[29]  Dee T. Allsop,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Research: Principles and Applications , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  C. Yoo,et al.  Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses , 2005 .

[32]  Richard Lempert.  The Significance of Statistical Significance: Two Authors Restate an Incontrovertible Caution - Why a Book? , 2008 .

[33]  J. Arndt.  Word of mouth advertising : a review of the literature , 1967 .

[34]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[35]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Online Interactions and Social Capital , 2006 .

[36]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[37]  Chang-Hoan Cho.  The Effectiveness of Banner Advertisements: Involvement and Click-through , 2003 .

[38]  P. Chatterjee,et al.  Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts , 2003 .

[39]  S. Ghose,et al.  Reciprocal Spillover Effects: A Strategic Benefit of Brand Extensions , 2003 .

[40]  James G. Maxham,et al.  Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: the effects of perceived justice on satisfaction and intent , 2002 .

[41]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites , 2011 .

[42]  Chris Hand,et al.  Internet advertising effectiveness , 2007 .

[43]  Richard Lempert,et al.  The Significance of Statistical Significance: , 2009, Law & Social Inquiry.

[44]  Abhijit Biswas,et al.  I Want to Buy the Advertised Product Only!: An Examination of the Effects of Additional Product Offers on Consumer Irritation in a Cross-Promotion Context , 2009 .

[45]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Hairong Li,et al.  Cognitive Impact of Banner Ad Characteristics: An Experimental Study , 1999 .

[47]  Sriram Kalyanaraman,et al.  AROUSAL, MEMORY, AND IMPRESSION-FORMATION EFFECTS OF ANIMATION SPEED IN WEB ADVERTISING , 2004 .

[48]  C. Yoo,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Animation in Online Banner Advertising , 2004 .

[49]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  Different Forced-Exposure Levels to Banner Advertisements , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[50]  George Baltas,et al.  Determinants of Internet Advertising Effectiveness: An Empirical Study , 2003 .

[51]  Annie Lang,et al.  Captured by the World Wide Web , 2002, Commun. Res..

[52]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Web Site Interactivity , 2008 .

[53]  C. Cooper,et al.  Communication and Attitude Change , 1982 .

[54]  Kathy Hammond,et al.  The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study , 2007 .

[55]  Kjell Grønhaug,et al.  The effect of ad value, ad placement and ad execution on the perceived intrusiveness of web advertisements , 2009 .

[56]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.