“Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows”

This article examines the use of the Internet by a range of political actors in the 2004 European Parliament election in Britain—candidates, citizens, parties, government, pressure groups, and the media. Specifically, it surveys the structure of online political communications and the amount and nature of electoral information and engagement opportunities available to citizens in the framework of recent theories of “third age of political communications.” Methodologically, the article builds on the identification (n= 571), sampling (n= 100), qualitative annotation, and quantitative content analysis of U.K.campaignWeb sites between mid-April and Election Day,June 10,2004. Evidence provides qualified support for previous findings that the online campaign, or the lack thereof,largely reflects the apathy and disillusionment of the press,national politicians, and the media with a distinctly second-order election.However,there are two important qualifications to this “politics as usual” scenario.First,political parties,candidates, and government agencies provided a considerably wider variety of political information and engagement opportunities than in the past. As only 7 percent of British adults used the Internet for electoral information, one might wonder why online contents were provided at all.Second,online information and engagement opportunities were structured on two underlying dimensions, of which one is overtly political—a public communication versus political communication cleavage—while the other—replication versus innovation of techno-political practice—touches upon the political economy of Web production in the “third media age.”

[1]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Online Structure for Political Action: Exploring Presidential Campaign Web Sites from the 2000 American Election , 2002 .

[2]  G. Irwin Second-order or third-rate?: Issues in the campaign for the elections for the European Parliament 1994 , 1995 .

[3]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Party Competition on the Internet in the United States and Britain , 1999 .

[4]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Digital Divide , 2018, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets.

[5]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Online Action in Campaign 2000: An Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere , 2002 .

[6]  C. D. Vreese,et al.  Television reporting of second-order elections , 2003 .

[7]  Oliver Quiring,et al.  Voters in a Changing Media Environment , 2005 .

[8]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  U.K. Political Parties and the Internet , 1998 .

[9]  Michael Marsh Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections , 1998, British Journal of Political Science.

[10]  J. Stanyer Political Communication in Transition , 2003 .

[11]  Stephen Ward,et al.  New Parties, New Media: Italian Party Politics and the Internet , 2000 .

[12]  D. Denver,et al.  British elections and parties review. , 1999 .

[13]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  An outsider's medium? The European elections and UK party competition on the internet , 2000 .

[14]  Robert E. Denton The 1992 presidential campaign : a communication perspective , 1994 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Hacker,et al.  Uses of computer‐mediated political communication in the 1992 presidential campaign: A content analysis of the Bush, Clinton and Perot computer lists , 1996 .

[16]  J. Bartle,et al.  Political Communications Transformed From Morrison to Mandelson , 2001 .

[17]  James L. Newell,et al.  Italian Political Parties on the Web , 2001 .

[18]  H. Schmitt,et al.  NINE SECOND‐ORDER NATIONAL ELECTIONS – A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ELECTION RESULTS , 1980 .

[19]  Dave D'Alessio,et al.  Adoption of the World Wide Web by American Political Candidates, 1996-1998 , 2000 .

[20]  R. Gibson,et al.  The First Internet Election? UK Political Parties and Campaigning in Cyberspace , 1998 .

[21]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[22]  R. Gibson,et al.  Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK , 2003 .

[23]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Parties Without Partisans , 2002 .

[24]  Paul Webb,et al.  Political Parties as Campaign Organizations , 2000 .

[25]  Stephen Ward,et al.  Political organisations and online mobilisation: Different media ‐ same outcomes? , 2002 .

[26]  P. Norris Political Communications and Democratic Politics , 2001 .

[27]  Donatella Campus Leaders, dreams and journeys: Italy's new political communication , 2002 .

[28]  J. Peter,et al.  The media and European Parliament elections: Second-rate coverage of a second-order event? , 2007 .

[29]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  On-Line and on Message? Candidate Websites in the 2001 General Election 1 , 2003 .

[30]  R. Gibson,et al.  Online Participation and Mobilisation in Britain: Hype, Hope and Reality , 2003 .

[31]  Paul Grosswiler,et al.  Historical Hopes, Media Fears, and the Electronic Town Meeting Concept: Where Technology Meets Democracy or Demagogy? , 1998 .

[32]  Leslie M. Tkach-Kawasaki Politics@Japan , 2003 .

[33]  R. Gibson Web campaigning from a global perspective , 2004 .

[34]  Rachel K. Gibson Campaigning in the UK : The Public Respond ? , 2002 .

[35]  C. Firestone,et al.  Elections in cyberspace : toward a new era in American politics , 1996 .

[36]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Political parties' use of the Web during the 2001 general election , 2002, Aslib Proc..