Combinatorial degradomics: Precision tools to unveil proteolytic processes in biological systems.

The biological activity of a protein is regulated at many levels ranging from control of transcription and translation to post-translational modifications (PTM). Proteolytic processing is an irreversible PTM generating novel isoforms of a mature protein termed proteoforms. Proteoform dynamics is a major focus of current proteome research, since it has been associated with many pathological conditions. Mass-spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics and PTM-specific enrichment workflows have become the methods of choice to study proteoforms in vitro and in vivo. Here, we give an overview of currently available MS-based degradomics methods and outline how they can be optimally applied to study protease cleavage events. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of selected approaches and describe state-of-the-art improvements in degradomics technologies. By introducing the concept of combinatorial degradomics, a combination of global discovery degradomics and highly sensitive targeted degradomics, we demonstrate how MS-based degradomics further evolves as a powerful tool in biomedical protease research.

[1]  P. Cieplak,et al.  Caspase Cleavage Sites in the Human Proteome: CaspDB, a Database of Predicted Substrates , 2014, Apoptosis.

[2]  A. Fonteh,et al.  Protein Analysis in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid: Physiological Aspects, Current Progress and Future Challenges , 2005, Disease markers.

[3]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  CutDB: a proteolytic event database , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Pitter F. Huesgen,et al.  Active site specificity profiling of the matrix metalloproteinase family: Proteomic identification of 4300 cleavage sites by nine MMPs explored with structural and synthetic peptide cleavage analyses. , 2016, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[5]  Paul Pavlidis,et al.  Network Analyses Reveal Pervasive Functional Regulation Between Proteases in the Human Protease Web , 2014, PLoS biology.

[6]  A. Dufour,et al.  Proteolytic Cleavage-Mechanisms, Function, and "Omic" Approaches for a Near-Ubiquitous Posttranslational Modification. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[7]  P. Cutler,et al.  Qualitative improvement and quantitative assessment of N‐terminomics , 2012, Proteomics.

[8]  Xiaofang Zhong,et al.  HOTMAQ: A Multiplexed Absolute Quantification Method for Targeted Proteomics. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  U. auf dem Keller,et al.  Exploring Extracellular Matrix Degradomes by TMT-TAILS N-Terminomics. , 2019, Methods in molecular biology.

[10]  Gary D Bader,et al.  The biology/disease-driven human proteome project (B/D-HPP): enabling protein research for the life sciences community. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[11]  B. Fingleton,et al.  Systems-Level Analysis of Proteolytic Events in Increased Vascular Permeability and Complement Activation in Skin Inflammation , 2013, Science Signaling.

[12]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .

[13]  U. Eckhard,et al.  TAILS N-terminomics and proteomics reveal complex regulation of proteolytic cleavage by O-glycosylation , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Damian Szklarczyk,et al.  Version 4.0 of PaxDb: Protein abundance data, integrated across model organisms, tissues, and cell‐lines , 2015, Proteomics.

[15]  Oliver M. Bernhardt,et al.  Optimization of Experimental Parameters in Data-Independent Mass Spectrometry Significantly Increases Depth and Reproducibility of Results* , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[16]  R. Zahedi,et al.  An improved workflow for quantitative N‐terminal charge‐based fractional diagonal chromatography (ChaFRADIC) to study proteolytic events in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2015, Proteomics.

[17]  K. Mechtler,et al.  Arginine phosphorylation marks proteins for degradation by a Clp protease , 2016, Nature.

[18]  L. Zhang,et al.  Hydrophobic Tagging-Assisted N-Termini Enrichment for In-Depth N-Terminome Analysis. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  K. Gevaert,et al.  Exploring proteomes and analyzing protein processing by mass spectrometric identification of sorted N-terminal peptides , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  U. auf dem Keller,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Protease Dynamics in Cutaneous Wound Healing by Degradomics Analysis of Porcine Wound Exudates* , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  Sharon Yang,et al.  Proteome TopFIND 3.0 with TopFINDer and PathFINDer: database and analysis tools for the association of protein termini to pre- and post-translational events , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  U. Schepers,et al.  Secretome protein enrichment identifies physiological BACE1 protease substrates in neurons , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[23]  S. Mahrus,et al.  Tags for labeling protein N-termini with subtiligase for proteomics. , 2008, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[24]  A. Hoofnagle,et al.  Interlaboratory agreement of insulin-like growth factor 1 concentrations measured by mass spectrometry. , 2014, Clinical chemistry.

[25]  John F. Valliere-Douglass,et al.  ELISA reagent coverage evaluation by affinity purification tandem mass spectrometry , 2017, mAbs.

[26]  Simonas Savickas,et al.  Targeted degradomics in protein terminomics and protease substrate discovery , 2017, Biological chemistry.

[27]  F. Avilés,et al.  Complementary positional proteomics for screening substrates of endo- and exoproteases , 2010, Nature Methods.

[28]  W. Weichert,et al.  An optimised version of the secretome protein enrichment with click sugars (SPECS) method leads to enhanced coverage of the secretome , 2017, Proteomics.

[29]  Adele Bourmaud,et al.  Parallel reaction monitoring using quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometer: Principle and applications , 2016, Proteomics.

[30]  S. Jaffrey,et al.  Global profiling of protease cleavage sites by chemoselective labeling of protein N-termini , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Pitter F. Huesgen,et al.  Sensitive Determination of Proteolytic Proteoforms in Limited Microscale Proteome Samples* , 2019, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[32]  Mathias Wilhelm,et al.  Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning , 2019, Nature Methods.

[33]  N. Slavov,et al.  SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation , 2017, Genome Biology.

[34]  Christopher M Overall,et al.  Identifying and quantifying proteolytic events and the natural N terminome by terminal amine isotopic labeling of substrates , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[35]  N. Kelleher,et al.  Top Down proteomics: facts and perspectives. , 2014, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[36]  C. Sander,et al.  Applications of targeted proteomics in systems biology and translational medicine , 2015, Proteomics.

[37]  R. Aebersold,et al.  On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance , 2016, Cell.

[38]  J. Olsen,et al.  Offline High pH Reversed-Phase Peptide Fractionation for Deep Phosphoproteome Coverage. , 2016, Methods in molecular biology.

[39]  A. Heck,et al.  Unbiased Selective Isolation of Protein N-terminal Peptides from Complex Proteome Samples Using Phospho Tagging (PTAG) and TiO2-based Depletion* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[40]  Joshua M. Scurll,et al.  The paracaspase MALT1 cleaves HOIL1 reducing linear ubiquitination by LUBAC to dampen lymphocyte NF-κB signalling , 2015, Nature Communications.

[41]  Gerard Cagney,et al.  An Overview of Label-Free Quantitation Methods in Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry , 2010, Proteome Bioinformatics.

[42]  P. Righetti,et al.  The ProteoMiner in the proteomic arena: a non-depleting tool for discovering low-abundance species. , 2008, Journal of proteomics.

[43]  A. Heck,et al.  Six alternative proteases for mass spectrometry–based proteomics beyond trypsin , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[44]  Martin Wühr,et al.  A Strategy to Combine Sample Multiplexing with Targeted Proteomics Assays for High-Throughput Protein Signature Characterization. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[45]  Jae Choi,et al.  TomahaqCompanion: A Tool for the Creation and Analysis of Isobaric Label Based Multiplexed Targeted Assays. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[46]  Oliver Schilling,et al.  Identification and relative quantification of native and proteolytically generated protein C-termini from complex proteomes: C-terminome analysis. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[47]  Lloyd M. Smith,et al.  Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity , 2013, Nature Methods.

[48]  Z. Szewczuk,et al.  Trends in the Design of New Isobaric Labeling Reagents for Quantitative Proteomics , 2019, Molecules.

[49]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Chromatographic Isolation of Methionine-containing Peptides for Gel-free Proteome Analysis , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[50]  T. Terasaki,et al.  Targeted proteomics-based quantitative protein atlas of pannexin and connexin subtypes in mouse and human tissues and cancer cell lines. , 2020, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[51]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[52]  Neil D. Rawlings,et al.  The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[53]  K. Resing,et al.  Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Methods.

[54]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments , 2014, Bioinform..

[55]  R. Zahedi,et al.  Simple, scalable, and ultrasensitive tip-based identification of protease substrates* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[56]  U. auf dem Keller,et al.  Matrix Metalloproteinase 10 Degradomics in Keratinocytes and Epidermal Tissue Identifies Bioactive Substrates With Pleiotropic Functions* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[57]  M. Fonović,et al.  Degradomics in Biomarker Discovery , 2019, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[58]  P. Pavlidis,et al.  Protease-Inhibitor Interaction Predictions: Lessons on the Complexity of Protein–Protein Interactions , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[59]  N. Slavov,et al.  SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation , 2017, Genome Biology.

[60]  Susan E. Abbatiello,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Improves Accuracy of Characterization of Multiplexed Mass Spectrometric Assays * , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[61]  Julia E. Seaman,et al.  The DegraBase: A Database of Proteolysis in Healthy and Apoptotic Human Cells* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.