Local estimates of available water capacity and effect of measurement errors on the spatial estimates and their uncertainties

The purpose of this work was to: (i) propose a methodology to infer local estimates of the available water capacity (AWC) at a plot from a few measurements in laboratory of AWC carried out on horizons of a pit on the same plot, (ii) examine the effect of measurement errors on spatial estimates of AWC and the associated uncertainties. For each horizon identified in the pit, the water content was determined at field capacity and at the permanent wilting point, and thus AWC. 47 soundings were carried out on a regular grid covering the plot. For each sounding, an AWC value was estimated by matching sounding horizons to the pit horizons. Laboratory measurements of AWC on 14 sites were used to validate the 47 local estimates. Statistics such as correlation coefficient, mean error and root mean square error are promising at 0.84, 4.0 mm and 17.5 mm, respectively. The spatialization of AWC was carried out by ordinary kriging, considering or ignoring the measurement errors on AWC. The precision of AWC estimates allowed making evident that accounting for measurement errors provided estimates that were more precise. This result, confirmed by the prediction interval coverage probability statistic, underlined that taking into account measurement errors in spatial modeling is an effective way to reduce the confidence interval of any estimate. These results suggest that it would be better to fix the nugget based on a preliminary test on the measurement error rather than to fix it based on the experimental variogram.

[1]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[2]  A. A. Mahboubi,et al.  Determination of soil available water for plants: Consistency between laboratory and field measurements , 2014 .

[3]  Bruno Mary,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of soil water content spatial patterns using geostatistical simulations: An empirical comparison of a simulation accounting for single attribute and a simulation accounting for secondary information , 2007 .

[4]  Dominique King,et al.  Using multiple external drifts to estimate a soil variable , 2003 .

[5]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Accounting for the measurement error of spectroscopically inferred soil carbon data for improved precision of spatial predictions. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Isabelle Cousin,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for predicting available water capacity in French soils, their applicability domain and associated uncertainty , 2019, Geoderma.

[7]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Predicting and mapping the soil available water capacity of Australian wheatbelt , 2014 .

[8]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[9]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Soil Water and Monitoring Technology , 2015 .

[10]  Durga L. Shrestha,et al.  Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output , 2006, Neural Networks.

[11]  Joe D. Luck,et al.  Soil water content monitoring for irrigation management:A geostatistical analysis , 2017 .

[12]  Ian J. Yule,et al.  Soil water status mapping and two variable-rate irrigation scenarios , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[13]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Spatial variability of soil water content and soil electrical conductivity across scales derived from Electromagnetic Induction and Time Domain Reflectometry , 2018 .

[14]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science , 2001 .

[15]  S. Prasher,et al.  Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point , 2004 .

[16]  L. Schröder,et al.  How Different Analysis and Interpolation Methods Affect the Accuracy of Ice Surface Elevation Changes Inferred from Satellite Altimetry , 2020, Mathematical Geosciences.

[17]  Dominique Arrouays,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of GlobalSoilMap soil available water capacity products: A French case study , 2019, Geoderma.

[18]  William F Christensen,et al.  Filtered Kriging for Spatial Data with Heterogeneous Measurement Error Variances , 2011, Biometrics.

[19]  J. Delhomme Kriging in the hydrosciences , 1978 .

[20]  D. J. Brus,et al.  Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring , 2006 .

[21]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[22]  H. Reuter,et al.  Functional Digital Soil Mapping for the Prediction of Available Water Capacity in Nigeria using Legacy Data , 2013 .

[23]  A. Robock,et al.  Temporal and spatial scales of observed soil moisture variations in the extratropics , 2000 .