In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths.

[1]  P. Vallittu,et al.  High volume individual fibre post versus low volume fibre post: the fracture load of the restored tooth. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  Chih-Han Chang,et al.  Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors: an in vitro and finite element study. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  C. Soares,et al.  Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis. , 2009, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[4]  S. Hamdan,et al.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems: in vitro study. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  K. Ludwig,et al.  Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  Zhimin Zhu,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  J. Thompson,et al.  An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post systems. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  F. Massa,et al.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with 2 different post-and-core designs fixed with 2 different luting cements: an in vitro study. Part II. , 2006, Quintessence international.

[9]  C. Kreulen,et al.  In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. , 2006, European journal of oral sciences.

[10]  S. Imazato,et al.  Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  J. Griggs,et al.  Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  M. Sousa-Neto,et al.  Removal resistance of glass-fiber and metallic cast posts with different lengths. , 2006, Journal of oral science.

[13]  P. Apse,et al.  The effect of 2 different diameter cast posts on tooth root fracture resistance in vitro. , 2006, Stomatologija.

[14]  Richard S Schwartz,et al.  Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Fatigue resistance and stiffness of glass fiber-reinforced urethane dimethacrylate composite. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Miguel A. Iglesia-Puig,et al.  Fiber-reinforced post and core adapted to a previous metal ceramic crown. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  A. Qualtrough,et al.  Effect of thermocycling on the retention of glass-fiber root canal posts. , 2003, Quintessence international.

[18]  P. Yaman,et al.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  L. Lindén,et al.  A comparison of strengths of five core and post-and-core systems. , 2002, Quintessence international.

[20]  L A Lang,et al.  The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  Freedman Ga,et al.  Esthetic post and core treatment , 2001 .

[22]  G. Freedman.  Esthetic post-and-core treatment. , 2001, Dental clinics of North America.

[23]  Stockton Lw.  Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review , 1999 .

[24]  L. Stockton.  Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  B Rilo,et al.  Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  Radkevich Ra,et al.  A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. , 1996 .

[28]  R. Radke,et al.  A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[29]  P. Plasmans,et al.  In vitro resistance of composite resin dowel and cores. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[30]  B. Musikant,et al.  Root fracture during insertion of prefabricated posts related to root size. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[31]  D. J. Sokol.  Effective use of current core and post concepts. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[32]  B. Korzen,et al.  Evaluation of the apical seal produced by a hybrid root canal filling method, combining lateral condensation and thermatic compaction. , 1984, Journal of endodontics.

[33]  A. Goerig,et al.  Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part I: concept for restorative designs. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[34]  J. Sakumura,et al.  Dowel form and tensile force. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[35]  B. G. Tidmarsh.  Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. , 1976, Journal of endodontics.

[36]  B. Horizonte,et al.  Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. , 1975 .

[37]  G. D. Steele.  Reinforced composite resin foundations for endodontically treated teeth. , 1973, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[38]  A A Caputo,et al.  Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. , 1972, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.