Difficulties in spinal needle use

The effect of different size (25‐, 27‐ and 29‐gauge) Quincke‐type spinal needles on the incidence of insertion difficulties and failure rates was investigated in a randomised, prospective study with 300 patients. The needle size was randomised but the insertion procedure was standardised. The time to achieve dural puncture was significantly longer with the 29‐gauge spinal needle compared with the larger bore needles and was due to the greater flexibility of the thin needle. However, the difference was less than 1 min and cannot be considered clinically significant. There were no significant differences between groups in the number of insertion attempts or failures and the same sensory level of analgesia was reached with all the needle sizes studied. Postoperatively, no postdural puncture headaches occurred in the 29‐gauge spinal needle group, whilst in the 25‐ and 27‐gauge needle groups, the postdural puncture headache rates were 7.4% and 2.1% respectively. The incidence of backache was similar in all study groups. We conclude that dural puncture with a 29‐gauge spinal needle is clinically as easy as with larger bore needles and its use is indicated in patients who have a high risk of postdural puncture headache.

[1]  D. N. Gow,et al.  The caesarean section , 1996, The Medical journal of Australia.

[2]  Salib Ym The Concept of a Conical Spinal Needle , 1992 .

[3]  P. Tarkkila,et al.  Comparison of Sprotte and Quincke Needles with Respect to Post Dural Puncture Headache and Backache , 1992, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[4]  Y. Salib The Concept of a Conical Spinal Needle , 1992, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[5]  I. Krings-Ernst,et al.  Use of a 25-gauge Whitacre needle to reduce the incidence of postdural puncture headache. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  P. Tarkkila,et al.  Complications during Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Study , 1991, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[7]  P. Tarkkila Incidence and Causes of Failed Spinal Anesthetics in a University Hospital: A Prospective Study , 1991, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[8]  L. Carrie,et al.  29-gauge spinal needles. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  V. Sarma,et al.  Intrathecal anaesthesia for day-care surgery. A retrospective study of 160 cases using 25- and 26-gauge spinal needles. , 1992, Anaesthesia.

[10]  M. Corbey,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia in day-care surgery with a 26-gauge needle. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  M. Corbey,et al.  SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN DAY-CARE SURGERY WITH A 26-GAUGE NEEDLE , 1990 .

[12]  V. Sarma,et al.  Intrathecal anaesthesia for day‐care surgery A retrospective study of 160 cases using 25‐ and 26‐gauge spinal needles , 1990 .

[13]  R. Macdonald,et al.  An evaluation of a 30‐gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section , 1990, Anaesthesia.

[14]  C. Pinnock,et al.  Spinal obstetric anesthesia with a 29-gauge needle. , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  E. Christensen,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29-gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia. , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  M. Gielen Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH): A Review , 1989, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[17]  T. Wisborg,et al.  Postdural puncture headache A comparison between 26‐ and 29‐gauge needles in young patients , 1989, Anaesthesia.

[18]  H. Flaatten,et al.  Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesia , 1987, Anaesthesia.