Suburban change: A time series approach to measuring form and spatial configuration

With few exceptions, the field of suburban studies has largely ignored the question of what happens to a suburb after initial development, and efforts toward this end are often hampered by limited techniques for the direct measurement of built form and space over time. Historic data sources and computational advancements are prevailing against some of these limitations, but there remains a need for techniques to gather and process formal and spatial suburban data: not merely in the aggregate, but also in detailed patterns within a study area. Given the permanence of spatial and formal configurations in our cities, it is essential to develop the tools to better understand and predict future patterns of growth and change. In this study, a method for examining the relationship between long-term changes in built form and predictive characteristics such as global integration and block size is developed and explored. Conzenian morphology and space syntax approaches are integrated within a geographic information system (GIS) framework, and used to study an historic first-ring suburb in Raleigh, NC at four points in time over a 96-year span. Aerial images, historic road and insurance maps, and GIS sources are used to generate spatial configuration and building data for each study time period. These data are then processed and analysed to identify statistical and map-pattern morphological and syntactic relationships. It is concluded that the resulting database is capable of identifying and successfully investigating relationships between predictor and outcome variables such as global integration and building demolitions – both in the aggregate and in bivariate patterns. Further, this methodological approach should provide a rich set of prediction tools for urban designers and planners.

[1]  A. Moudon Urban Morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field , 2022, Urban Morphology.

[2]  G. Hallowell Understanding Structural Inertia: Examining Suburban Morphology and Patterns of Persistence and Change , 2013 .

[3]  Mordechai Haklay,et al.  The persistence of suburban centres in Greater London: combining Conzenian and space syntax approaches , 2010, Urban Morphology.

[4]  P. Osmond The urban structural unit: towards a descriptive framework to support urban analysis and planning , 2009, Urban Morphology.

[5]  C. Jones,et al.  Do the suburbs exist? Discovering complexity and specificity in suburban built form , 2009 .

[6]  Karl Kropf,et al.  Aspects of urban form , 2009, Urban Morphology.

[7]  Peter Bosselmann,et al.  Urban Transformation: Understanding City Design and Form , 2008 .

[8]  M. Haklay,et al.  Towards a spatial understanding of how suburbs adapt to change , 2008 .

[9]  C. Jones,et al.  Visualising London's Suburbs , 2008 .

[10]  R. McManus,et al.  Suburbs in transition: new approaches to suburban history , 2007, Urban History.

[11]  P. Larkham The study of urban form in Great Britain , 2006, Urban Morphology.

[12]  D. Sohn,et al.  An analysis of the relationship between land use density of office buildings and urban street configuration: Case studies of two areas in Seoul by space syntax analysis , 2002 .

[13]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology , 2002, Trans. GIS.

[14]  S. Ward Changing Suburbs: Foundation, Form and Function , 2001 .

[15]  B. Scheer The Anatomy of Sprawl , 2001 .

[16]  B. Scheer Inner-city destruction and survival: the case of Over-the-Rhine, Cincinnati , 2001, Urban Morphology.

[17]  C. Carr,et al.  The Changing Fabrics of Ordinary Residential Areas , 1999, Urban studies.

[18]  A. Levy Urban morphology and the problem of the modern urban fabric: some questions for research , 1999, Urban Morphology.

[19]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture , 1996 .

[20]  M. Semyonov,et al.  Suburban Change and Persistence , 1979 .

[21]  S. Griffiths Persistence and Change in the Spatio-Temporal Description of Sheffield Parish c.1750-1905 , 2009 .

[22]  Olof Netzell,et al.  Can Space Syntax Help Us in Understanding the Intraurban Office Rent Pattern? Accessibility and Rents in Downtown Stockholm , 2008 .

[23]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The city as one thing , 2007 .

[24]  A Siksna,et al.  The effects of block size and form in North American and Australian city centres , 1997 .

[25]  Eric Sandweiss,et al.  BUILT FOR CHANGE: NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURE IN SAN FRANCISCO , 1987, Landscape Journal.

[26]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The social logic of space: Buildings and their genotypes , 1984 .

[27]  J. Whitehand The basis for an historico-geographical theory of urban form , 1977 .

[28]  M. Conzen Alnwick, Northumberland : a study in town-plan analysis , 1960 .