The connective role of improvisation in dealing with uncertainty during invention and design processes

This paper explores the role of improvisation in design thinking for product design processes and design research methods. Improvisation is often at the core of practice-based and participatory design, permitting flexibility. The role of improvisation in the performing arts has received considerable academic attention, however its role in design processes has been neglected, because improvisation is often viewed as the second-best solution to design problems. This paper presents a framework for improvisation by surveying existing scholarship. Additionally, field study data collected between 2011 and 2016, primarily in Namibia and Australia, will be used to illustrate how improvisation is applied by practitioners during their art and design activities. The connective function of improvisation allows designers to negotiate, take risks, unmake and remake formations. This function enables the fluidity of design, to move from one moment in a process to the next, allowing designers to negotiate ways of work during uncertainty.

[1]  Howard S. Becker,et al.  Art Worlds and Social Types , 1976, Afterimage.

[2]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Roles of Recognition Processes and Look-Ahead Search in Time-Constrained Expert Problem Solving: Evidence From Grand-Master-Level Chess , 1996 .

[5]  T. Mccormack,et al.  The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts , 1997 .

[6]  E. Thompson,et al.  Neurophenomenology Integrating Subjective Experience and Brain Dynamics in the Neuroscience of Consciousness , 2003 .

[7]  A. Montuori.  The Complexity of Improvisation and the Improvisation of Complexity: Social Science, Art and Creativity , 2003 .

[8]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  The intuitive executive:Understanding and applying ‘gut feel’ in decision-making , 2004 .

[9]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  CHAPTER 20 Constructionism and the Grounded Theory Method , 2007 .

[11]  T. Ingold,et al.  Creativity and Cultural Improvisation , 2007 .

[12]  Glenn Adamson,et al.  Thinking Through Craft , 2007 .

[13]  Martine Lussier,et al.  The Philosophy of Improvisation , 2011 .

[14]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Students' Intuitive Understanding of Promisingness and Promisingness Judgments to Facilitate Knowledge Advancement , 2012, ICLS.

[15]  R. Sennett,et al.  The Craftsman , 2015, London.

[16]  Richard Buchanan.  Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture , 2015 .

[17]  N. Nimkulrat,et al.  On understanding expertise, connoisseurship, and experiential knowledge in professional practice , 2016 .

[18]  Ursula Dresdner.  Free Play Improvisation In Life And Art , 2016 .