Urban retrofitting: Identifying disruptive and sustaining technologies using performative and foresight techniques

Cities, which are now inhabited by a majority of the world's population, are not only an important source of global environmental and resource depletion problems, but can also act as important centres of technological innovation and social learning in the continuing quest for a low carbon future. Planning and managing large-scale transitions in cities to deal with these pressures require an understanding of urban retrofitting at city scale. In this context performative techniques (such as backcasting and roadmapping) can provide valuable tools for helping cities develop a strategic view of the future. However, it is also important to identify ‘disruptive’ and ‘sustaining’ technologies which may contribute to city-based sustainability transitions. This paper presents research findings from the EPSRC Retrofit 2050 project, and explores the relationship between technology roadmaps and transition theory literature, highlighting the research gaps at urban/city level. The paper develops a research methodology to describe the development of three guiding visions for city-regional retrofit futures, and identifies key sustaining and disruptive technologies at city scale within these visions using foresight (horizon scanning) techniques. The implications of the research for city-based transition studies and related methodologies are discussed.

[1]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[2]  Beth Perry,et al.  The SURF-ARUP framework for urban infrastructural development. No:2 , 2009 .

[3]  W. McDowall Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy , 2012 .

[4]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Sustainable urban futures , 2013 .

[5]  M. Hodson,et al.  Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? , 2010 .

[6]  Neil Pollock,et al.  The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation , 2010 .

[7]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[8]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Assessing socially disruptive technological change , 2010 .

[9]  Malcolm Eames,et al.  City futures: exploring urban retrofit and sustainable transitions , 2013 .

[10]  Ray Hudson,et al.  Material matters and the search for resilience: rethinking regional and urban development strategies in the context of global environmental change , 2008 .

[11]  Bruce V. Taylor,et al.  Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation , 2010 .

[12]  Malcolm Eames Developing Urban Retrofit Scenarios: An Outline Framework for Scenario Foresight and Appraisal , 2011 .

[13]  R. Kemp Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe , 2011 .

[14]  Tim Dixon Hotting up? an analysis of low carbon plans and strategies for UK cities. Volume 1: Main findings , 2011 .

[15]  F. Geels The role of the cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples , 2010 .

[16]  F. Geels Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  J. S. Cavin Quand les villes pensent leurs futurs , 2006 .

[18]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[19]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Briefing: Re-Engineering the City 2020–2050 – Urban Foresight and Transition Management , 2014 .

[20]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[21]  David Tyfield,et al.  Low‐carbon disruptive innovation in China , 2010 .

[22]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[23]  M. Lawhon,et al.  Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[24]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Backcasting images of the future city-Time and space for sustainable development in Stockholm , 2011 .

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[26]  Simon Joss,et al.  ECO-CITIES: THE MAINSTREAMING OF URBAN SUSTAINABILITY – KEY CHARACTERISTICS AND DRIVING FACTORS , 2011 .

[27]  Mike Hodson,et al.  World Cities And Climate Change: Producing Urban Ecological Security , 2010 .

[28]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[29]  Philip Greenacre,et al.  Innovation Theory: A review of the literature , 2012 .

[30]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Mediating Low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action , 2012 .

[31]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Triumph of the city , 2012 .

[32]  Malcolm Eames,et al.  Visioning Retrofit Futures , 2012 .

[33]  Erwin Danneels Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[34]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[35]  Frank Gaffikin,et al.  New Visions for Old Cities: The Role of Visioning in Planning , 2006 .

[36]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework , 2006 .

[37]  Aumnad Phdungsilp Futures studies’ backcasting method used for strategic sustainable city planning , 2011 .

[38]  T. Elmqvist,et al.  Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems , 2010, AMBIO.

[39]  Dan Yu,et al.  A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory , 2010 .

[40]  Yu Dan,et al.  A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[41]  Xuemei Bai,et al.  Integrating Global Environmental Concerns into Urban Management: The Scale and Readiness Arguments , 2007 .

[42]  Neil Kleiman Green Cities: How Urban Sustainability Efforts can and must Drive America’s Climate Change Policies , 2009 .

[43]  Petter Næss,et al.  Sustainable urban development and the multi- level transition perspective , 2012 .

[44]  W. McDowall,et al.  Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature , 2006 .

[45]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[46]  Maj Munch Andersen,et al.  The Greening of Innovation Systems for Eco-innovation - Towards an Evolutionary Climate Mitigation Policy , 2009 .

[47]  William Eadson Constructions of the carbon city , 2011 .

[48]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Deliberate futures: precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology , 2007 .

[49]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Backcasting for sustainability : Introduction to the special issue , 2011 .

[50]  R. Kostoff,et al.  Disruptive technology roadmaps , 2004 .

[51]  M. Batty,et al.  Building a science of cities , 2012 .

[52]  Sohail Inayatullah,et al.  The causal layered analysis (CLA) reader:theory and case studies of an integrative and transformative methodology , 2004 .

[53]  Sohail Inayatullah,et al.  City futures in transformation: Emerging issues and case studies , 2011 .