Quantifying the erosion of natural darkness in the global protected area system

The nighttime light environment of much of the earth has been transformed by the introduction of electric lighting. This impact continues to spread with growth in the human population and extent of urbanization. This has profound consequences for organismal physiology and behavior and affects abundances and distributions of species, community structure, and likely ecosystem functions and processes. Protected areas play key roles in buffering biodiversity from a wide range of anthropogenic pressures. We used a calibration of a global satellite data set of nighttime lights to determine how well they are fulfilling this role with regard to artificial nighttime lighting. Globally, areas that are protected tend to be darker at night than those that are not, and, with the exception of Europe, recent regional declines in the proportion of the area that is protected and remains dark have been small. However, much of these effects result from the major contribution to overall protected area coverage by the small proportion of individual protected areas that are very large. Thus, in Europe and North America high proportions of individual protected areas (>17%) have exhibited high levels of nighttime lighting in all recent years, and in several regions (Europe, Asia, South and Central America) high proportions of protected areas (32–42%) have had recent significant increases in nighttime lighting. Limiting and reversing the erosion of nighttime darkness in protected areas will require routine consideration of nighttime conditions when designating and establishing new protected areas; establishment of appropriate buffer zones around protected areas where lighting is prohibited; and landscape level reductions in artificial nighttime lighting, which is being called for in general to reduce energy use and economic costs.

[1]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Influences of artificial lighting on the seaward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta , 1991 .

[2]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[3]  M. Arroyo,et al.  Conservation Targets in South American Temperate Forests , 1998, Science.

[4]  Boulder,et al.  The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness , 2001, astro-ph/0108052.

[5]  R. G. Wright,et al.  NATURE RESERVES: DO THEY CAPTURE THE FULL RANGE OF AMERICA'S BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY? , 2001 .

[6]  Paul C. Sutton,et al.  A scale-adjusted measure of Urban sprawl using nighttime satellite imagery , 2003 .

[7]  R. G. Wright,et al.  Assessment of current and proposed nature reserves of Mexico based on their capacity to protect geophysical features and biodiversity , 2004 .

[8]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological light pollution , 2004 .

[9]  C. Peres Why We Need Megareserves in Amazonia , 2005 .

[10]  L. Mercatelli,et al.  Moon orientation in adult and young sandhoppers under artificial light , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. Obeso,et al.  Fragmentation patterns and protection of montane forest in the Cantabrian range (NW Spain) , 2005 .

[12]  J. A. Quintanilha,et al.  DMSP/OLS night‐time light imagery for urban population estimates in the Brazilian Amazon , 2006 .

[13]  Mark W. Miller Apparent Effects of Light Pollution on Singing Behavior of American Robins , 2006 .

[14]  M. Salmon,et al.  Effects of exposure to artificial lighting on orientation of hatchling sea turtles on the beach and in the ocean , 2007 .

[15]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Persistence and vulnerability: Retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[16]  George Wittemyer,et al.  Accelerated Human Population Growth at Protected Area Edges , 2008, Science.

[17]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The Ecological Performance of Protected Areas , 2008 .

[18]  Mikhail Zhizhin,et al.  A Fifteen Year Record of Global Natural Gas Flaring Derived from Satellite Data , 2009 .

[19]  S. Harris,et al.  Street Lighting Disturbs Commuting Bats , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  Airam Rodríguez,et al.  Attraction of petrels to artificial lights in the Canary Islands: effects of the moon phase and age class , 2009 .

[21]  Marie Dacke,et al.  Visual Orientation and Navigation in Nocturnal Arthropods , 2010, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[22]  Christian Wolter,et al.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Artificial Night Lighting Affects Dawn Song, Extra-Pair Siring Success, and Lay Date in Songbirds , 2010, Current Biology.

[24]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Very Large Protected Areas and Their Contribution to Terrestrial Biological Conservation , 2010 .

[25]  B. Griefahn,et al.  The Dark Side of Light: A Transdisciplinary Research Agenda for Light Pollution Policy , 2010 .

[26]  Franz Hölker,et al.  Lunar skylight polarization signal polluted by urban lighting , 2011 .

[27]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  Using luminosity data as a proxy for economic statistics , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  K. Tockner,et al.  The influence of artificial light on stream and riparian ecosystems: questions, challenges, and perspectives , 2011 .

[29]  M. J. Butt Estimation of Light Pollution Using Satellite Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Techniques , 2012 .

[30]  K. Gaston,et al.  Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities , 2012, Biology Letters.

[31]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  REVIEW: Reducing the ecological consequences of night‐time light pollution: options and developments , 2012, The Journal of applied ecology.

[32]  S. Harris,et al.  Conserving energy at a cost to biodiversity? Impacts of LED lighting on bats , 2012 .

[33]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Sustainability: A green light for efficiency , 2013, Nature.

[34]  P. Banks,et al.  The urban matrix and artificial light restricts the nightly ranging behaviour of Gould's long‐eared bat (Nyctophilus gouldi) , 2013 .

[35]  D. Dominoni,et al.  Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  S. Sulliván,et al.  Bright lights, big city: influences of ecological light pollution on reciprocal stream-riparian invertebrate fluxes. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  M. Byrne,et al.  Dung Beetles Use the Milky Way for Orientation , 2013, Current Biology.

[38]  Christopher Small,et al.  Night on Earth: Mapping decadal changes of anthropogenic night light in Asia , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[39]  Franz Hölker,et al.  Do artificially illuminated skies affect biodiversity in nocturnal landscapes? , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Robin Meczes A Green Light for Urban Efficiency , 2013 .

[41]  Hui Li,et al.  Automatic intercalibration of night-time light imagery using robust regression , 2013 .

[42]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Can satellite-based night lights be used for conservation? The case of nesting sea turtles in the Mediterranean , 2013 .

[43]  Jonathan Bennie,et al.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[44]  K. Gaston,et al.  Contrasting trends in light pollution across Europe based on satellite observed night time lights , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Human alteration of natural light cycles: causes and ecological consequences , 2014, Oecologia.

[46]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library , 2015 .

[47]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Systematic Conservation Planning with Marxan , 2017 .