Speculations on Immunosomatics: Potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Immune Homeostasis Concepts

If we compare the current common sense in immunology with that often years ago, the most remarkable change is, perhaps, the notion that self-reactivity is a characteristic of normal immune systems and not necessarily a synonym of aggressive autoimmunity. This notion of physiological autoreactivities has made its way with some difficulty, and it continues to be contested by quite a few. This is, however, the normal reaction to a new idea from a scientific community used to seizing on novelties only if they add to the established frameworks and paradigm (see Ref. 1 for another such example). Besides, conservatism may be justified in science, for a body of 'established truths' must exist in any discipline. We shall neither review the evidence for functional autoreactive B and T cells in normal individuals, nor consider putative mechanisms of dominant tolerance that must operate in normal immune systems harbouring pathogenic autoreactive lymphocytes. This has been done before (see Ref. 2). Our intention here is twofold; first, to underline the contradictions that persist today in the field, once the existence of autoreactivities in normal individuals has been accepted; second, to speculate on further developments of what is becoming the new common sense. We will restrict our discussion to B cells and antibodies, for reasons that will become apparent below.

[1]  J. Dwyer Manipulating the immune system with immune globulin. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Normal serum immunoglobulins participate in the selection of peripheral B-cell repertoires. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  F. Varela,et al.  Population dynamics of natural antibodies in normal and autoimmune individuals. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Diamond,et al.  A novel class of anti-DNA antibodies identified in BALB/c mice , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  T. Ternynck,et al.  IgG autoantibody activity in normal mouse serum is controlled by IgM. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[6]  P. Ross Lorenz's Butterfly , 1990 .

[7]  S. Ohno Commentary on “The Protecton: The Evolutionarily Selected Unit of Humoral Immunity” , 1990, Immunological reviews.

[8]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Beyond Clonal Selection and Network , 1989, Immunological reviews.

[9]  F. Varela,et al.  Evidence for a functional idiotypic network among natural antibodies in normal mice. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  A. Coutinho,et al.  From an Antigen‐Centered, Clonal Perspective of Immune Responses to an Organism‐Centered, Network Perspective of Autonomous Activity in a Self‐Referential Immune System , 1984, Immunological reviews.

[11]  Immunoglobulin Gene Expression by T Lymphocytes , 1983, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[12]  S. Avrameas,et al.  Studies on natural antibodiesand autoantibodies , 1983 .

[13]  S. Avrameas,et al.  Studies on natural antibodies and autoantibodies. , 1983, Annales d'immunologie.

[14]  S. Avrameas,et al.  Natural antibodies against tubulin, actin myoglobin, thyroglobulin, fetuin, albumin and transferrin are present in normal human sera, and monoclonal immunoglobulins from multiple myeloma and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia may express similar antibody specificities. , 1981, Annales d'immunologie.

[15]  E. Nicholls The evolution of an immune system. , 1979, Medical hypotheses.

[16]  F J Varela,et al.  Self and non-sense: an organism-centered approach to immunology. , 1978, Medical hypotheses.

[17]  L. Hammarström,et al.  Characterization of self-reactive B cells by polyclonal B-cell activators , 1977, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  H. Gleichmann,et al.  Autoimmunization and Lymphomagenesis in Parent‐F1 Combinations Differing at the Major Histocompatibility Complex: Model for Spontaneous Disease Caused by Altered Self‐Antigens? , 1976, Transplantation reviews.

[19]  F. Burnet A modification of jerne's theory of antibody production using the concept of clonal selection , 1976, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  P. Grabar Hypothesis. Auto-antibodies and immunological theories: an analytical review. , 1975, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[21]  J. Playfair,et al.  Induction of red cell autoantibodies in normal mice. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[22]  I. B. Fridleifsson,et al.  Strontium Isotopes and Rare Earth Elements in Basalts from the Heimaey and Surtsey Volcanic Eruptions , 1973, Nature.

[23]  A. Frappier CLONAL SELECTION THEORY OF ACQUIRED IMMUNITY , 1961 .

[24]  J. Lederberg Genes and antibodies. , 1959, Science.

[25]  A. Coutinho,et al.  Some reasons why deletion and anergy do not satisfactorily account for natural tolerance. , 1992, Research in immunology.

[26]  F. Varela,et al.  Second generation immune networks. , 1991, Immunology today.

[27]  S. Avrameas Natural autoantibodies: from 'horror autotoxicus' to 'gnothi seauton'. , 1991, Immunology today.

[28]  Transgenic mice and immunological tolerance. , 1991, Immunological reviews.

[29]  R. Paque,et al.  A History of Immunology , 1990 .

[30]  N. Vaz Chapter 4 – The Uniqueness and Boundaries of the Idiotypic Self , 1984 .