Protocol for a mixed-methods realist evaluation of a health service user feedback system in Bangladesh

Introduction Responsiveness to service users’ views is a widely recognised objective of health systems. A key component of responsive health systems is effective interaction between users and service providers. Despite a growing literature on patient feedback from high-income settings, less is known about effectiveness of such systems in low-income and middle-income countries. Methodology and analysis This paper disseminates the protocol for an 18-month ‘RESPOND’ project that aims to evaluate the system of collecting and responding to user feedback in Bangladesh. This mixed-method study uses a realist evaluation approach to examine user feedback systems at two Upazila health complexes in Comilla District of Bangladesh, and comprises three steps: (1) initial theory development; (2) theory validation; and (3) theory refinement and development of lessons learnt. The project also uses (1) process evaluation to understand causal mechanisms and contexts of implementation; (2) statistical analysis of patient feedback to clarify the nature of issues reported; (3) social science methods to illuminate feedback processes and user and provider experiences; and (4) health policy and systems research to clarify issues related to integration of feedback systems with quality assurance and human resource management. During data analysis, qualitative and quantitative findings will be integrated throughout to help achieve study objectives. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data will be done using a convergent mixed-methods model, involving continuous triangulation of multiple data sets to facilitate greater understanding of the context of user feedback systems including the links with relevant policies, practices and programmes. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approvals were obtained from the University of Leeds and the Bangladesh Medical Research Council. All data collected for this study will be anonymised, and identifying characteristics of respondents will not appear in a final manuscript or reports. The study findings will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

[1]  A. Haines,et al.  The Millennium Development Goals will not be attained without new research addressing health system constraints to delivering effective interventions: Report of the Task Force on Health Systems Research , 2005 .

[2]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[3]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Protocol—the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation , 2015, BMJ Open.

[4]  B. Uzochukwu,et al.  Study protocol: realist evaluation of effectiveness and sustainability of a community health workers programme in improving maternal and child health in Nigeria , 2015, Implementation Science.

[5]  J. Barlow,et al.  Patient and Public Involvement in Healthcare Quality Improvement: How organizations can help patients and professionals to collaborate , 2015 .

[6]  Alex Gillespie,et al.  Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[7]  J. Raven,et al.  Can action research strengthen district health management and improve health workforce performance? A research protocol , 2013, BMJ Open.

[8]  Joanne Greenhalgh,et al.  RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[9]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  A review of policy dissemination and implementation research funded by the National Institutes of Health, 2007–2014 , 2015, Implementation Science.

[10]  Sophie Yahui Hsieh,et al.  Healthcare complaints handling systems: a comparison between Britain, Australia and Taiwan , 2011, Health services management research.

[11]  S. Oliver,et al.  Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Nancy E Krusen,et al.  Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and therapy , 2017 .

[13]  S. Y. Hsieh The use of patient complaints to drive quality improvement: an exploratory study in Taiwan , 2010, Health services management research.

[14]  S. Nayar,et al.  Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy , 2014 .

[15]  M. Crawford,et al.  Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Sachiko Ozawa,et al.  10 best resources on ... mixed methods research in health systems. , 2014, Health policy and planning.

[17]  B. Criel,et al.  How does capacity building of health managers work? A realist evaluation study protocol , 2012, BMJ Open.

[18]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[19]  Richard M. Cullen,et al.  Implementation of the BETTER 2 program: a qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of a novel way to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care , 2016, Implementation Science.

[20]  T. Mirzoev,et al.  Research-policy partnerships - experiences of the Mental Health and Poverty Project in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia , 2012, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[21]  M. Dieleman,et al.  A realist synthesis of the effect of social accountability interventions on health service providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  Sara Bennett,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from Elsevier Ltd Overcoming Health-systems Constraints to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals , 2022 .

[23]  P. M. Jonsson,et al.  Patient claims and complaints data for improving patient safety. , 2008, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[24]  Peter Kamuzora,et al.  Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[25]  M. Street,et al.  A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[26]  R. Morgan,et al.  Patient complaints in healthcare services in Vietnam’s health system , 2015, SAGE open medicine.

[27]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[28]  T. Mirzoev,et al.  Coherence between health policy and human resource strategy: lessons from maternal health in Vietnam, India and China. , 2015, Health policy and planning.

[29]  C. Goodman,et al.  Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework , 2012, Health policy and planning.

[30]  S. Y. Hsieh An exploratory study of complaints handling and nature. , 2012, International journal of nursing practice.

[31]  S. Y. Hsieh A System for Using Patient Complaints as a Trigger to Improve Quality , 2011, Quality management in health care.

[32]  Nicoletta Stame,et al.  Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity , 2004 .