A Mobile Internet Service for Self-Management of Physical Activity in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Challenges in Advancing the Co-Design Process During the Requirements Specification Phase

Background User involvement in the development of health care services is important for the viability, usability, and effectiveness of services. This study reports on the second step of the co-design process. Objective The aim was to explore the significant challenges in advancing the co-design process during the requirements specification phase of a mobile Internet service for the self-management of physical activity (PA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods A participatory action research design was used to involve lead users and stakeholders as co-designers. Lead users (n=5), a clinical physiotherapist (n=1), researchers (n=2) with knowledge in PA in RA and behavioral learning theories, an eHealth strategist (n=1), and an officer from the patient organization (n=1) collaborated in 4 workshops. Data-collection methods included video recordings and naturalistic observations. Results The inductive qualitative video-based analysis resulted in 1 overarching theme, merging perspectives, and 2 subthemes reflecting different aspects of merging: (1) finding a common starting point and (2) deciding on design solutions. Seven categories illustrated the specific challenges: reaching shared understanding of goals, clarifying and handling the complexity of participants’ roles, clarifying terminology related to system development, establishing the rationale for features, negotiating features, transforming ideas into concrete features, and participants’ alignment with the agreed goal and task. Conclusions Co-designing the system requirements of a mobile Internet service including multiple stakeholders was a complex and extensive collaborative decision-making process. Considering, valuing, counterbalancing, and integrating different perspectives into agreements and solutions (ie, the merging of participants’ perspectives) were crucial for moving the process forward and were considered the core challenges of co-design. Further research is needed to replicate the results and to increase knowledge on key factors for a successful co-design of health care services.

[1]  Gary Klein,et al.  User and developer common knowledge: Effect on the success of information system development projects , 2009 .

[2]  Fabrice Gzil,et al.  Person-centredness: Conceptual and historical perspectives , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research , 2009 .

[4]  Paul Bate,et al.  Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[5]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Getting to "we" , 2008, CACM.

[6]  Gary Klein,et al.  User commitment and collaboration: Motivational antecedents and project performance , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[7]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  C. Keller,et al.  Development of a Web-Based and Mobile App to Support Physical Activity in Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the Second Step of a Co-Design Process , 2015, JMIR research protocols.

[9]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  User Experience with and Assessment of Participative Systems Design , 1985, MIS Q..

[10]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[11]  Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen,et al.  Person-Centered Care — Ready for Prime Time , 2011, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[13]  Konstantinos Antypas,et al.  Combining Users’ Needs With Health Behavior Models in Designing an Internet- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Physical Activity in Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2014, JMIR research protocols.

[14]  L. Lindkvist Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups , 2005 .

[15]  Gary Klein,et al.  Partnering effects on user-developer conflict and role ambiguity in information system projects , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  Luc P de Witte,et al.  Experiences of Multidisciplinary Development Team Members During User-Centered Design of Telecare Products and Services: A Qualitative Study , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Christoph Rosenkranz,et al.  The emergence of shared understanding: applying functional pragmatics to study the requirements development process , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational study , 2014 .

[19]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Åsa Revenäs,et al.  Lead users’ ideas on core features to support physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a first step in the development of an internet service using participatory design , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[21]  Mark Keil,et al.  The user–developer communication process: a critical case study , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..