Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis

Several studies exist which use scientific literature for comparing scientific activities (e.g., productivity, and collaboration). In this study, using co-authorship data over the last 40 years, we present the evolutionary dynamics of multi level (i.e., individual, institutional and national) collaboration networks for exploring the emergence of collaborations in the research field of “steel structures”. The collaboration network of scientists in the field has been analyzed using author affiliations extracted from Scopus between 1970 and 2009. We have studied collaboration distribution networks at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels for the 40 years. We compared and analyzed a number of properties of these networks (i.e., density, centrality measures, the giant component and clustering coefficient) for presenting a longitudinal analysis and statistical validation of the evolutionary dynamics of “steel structures” collaboration networks. At all levels, the scientific collaborations network structures were central considering the closeness centralization while betweenness and degree centralization were much lower. In general networks density, connectedness, centralization and clustering coefficient were highest in marco-level and decreasing as the network size grow to the lowest in micro-level. We also find that the average distance between countries about two and institutes five and for authors eight meaning that only about eight steps are necessary to get from one randomly chosen author to another.

[1]  Yichuan Jiang Locating active actors in the scientific collaboration communities based on interaction topology analyses , 2007, Scientometrics.

[2]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  On the Correlation between Research Performance and Social Network Analysis Measures Applied to Research Collaboration Networks , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  A Social Network System for Analyzing Publication Activities of Researchers , 2010, SOCO 2010.

[4]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[5]  M. Leclerc,et al.  International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science , 1994, Scientometrics.

[6]  Francisco J. Acedo,et al.  Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis , 2006 .

[7]  S. Borgatti Centrality and AIDS , 1995 .

[8]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[10]  D. Sonnenwald Scientific collaboration , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[13]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.

[14]  Á. M. Hernáez Borgatti, Stephen; Martin Everett i Lin Freeman. UCINET IV. Network Analysis Software. Version 1.0. Columbia: Analytic Technologies, 1992 , 1995 .

[15]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities , 2010, Scientometrics.

[16]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph , 2002 .

[18]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[19]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[20]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality , 1980 .

[21]  J. Moody The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[22]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[23]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[24]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[25]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences , 2001 .

[26]  B. Shekar,et al.  Discovering Mentorship Information from Author Collaboration Networks , 2007, Discovery Science.

[27]  G. Melin Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[28]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  John R. Cutcliffe A comparison of us and european conceptualisations of clinical supervision , 2011 .

[30]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[32]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[33]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.