Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use

This research considers whether interpretive techniques can be used to enhance our understanding of computer-mediated discussions. The case study considered in this research is the use of a group support system (GSS) to support employee discussions about gender equity in a university. Transcripts of the four discussions were analyzed

[1]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The Influence of Societal Factors on the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange in the Netherlands , 1993, Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development.

[2]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering , 1997 .

[3]  David E. Avison,et al.  Information systems and anthropology: and anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture , 1995, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[6]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[7]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[8]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Critical ethnography in information systems , 1997 .

[9]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .

[10]  P. Prasad.  Systems of meaning: ethnography as a methodology for the study of information technologies , 1997 .

[11]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[12]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  Understanding Computer-Supported Group Work: The Effects of Interaction Frequency on Group Process and Outcome , 1995 .

[13]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[14]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  P. R. Sanday.  The Ethnographic Paradigm(s). , 1979 .

[16]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using Computing in Quality Team Meetings: Initial Observations from the IRS-Minnesota Project , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Eileen Moore Trauth,et al.  The Culture of an Information Economy: Influences and Impacts in the Republic of Ireland , 2000 .

[18]  M. Agar.  Speaking of ethnography , 1985 .

[19]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[20]  E. Davidson,et al.  Examining project history narratives: an analytic approach , 1997 .

[21]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[22]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[24]  Allen S. Lee.  Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[26]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[28]  C. Hempel.  Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[29]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[30]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms , 1995 .

[31]  J. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Numerical and Logical Group Size on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1995 .

[32]  Brad M. Jackson,et al.  Interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies , 1993 .

[33]  Margaret Anzul,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: Circles Within Circles , 1991 .

[34]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Group Support Systems , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Group decision support systems: a new frontier , 1984, DATB.

[37]  J. Kirk,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1985 .

[38]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The Culture of an Information Economy , 2000 .

[39]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Diagnosis of an information system failure: A framework and interpretive process , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[41]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[42]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[43]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[44]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  On the Shoulders of the Spouses of Scientists , 1977 .

[45]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Gender differences and computing: Students' assessment of societal influences , 1985 .

[48]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[49]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  The Impact of a Structured-Argument Approach on Group Problem Formulation* , 1995 .

[50]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[51]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[52]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Faltering from ethnography to design , 1992, CSCW '92.

[53]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[54]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[55]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[56]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[57]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[58]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[59]  L. Harvey,et al.  A discourse on ethnography , 1997 .

[60]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[61]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Women in Ireland’s Information Industry: Voices from Inside , 2017 .

[62]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[63]  S. K. Lo,et al.  Reliability and Validity , 2020, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography.

[64]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Using ethnography in contextural design , 1997, CACM.

[65]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media? , 1994 .

[66]  Leonard Michael Jessup,et al.  Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System* , 1991 .

[67]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[68]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[69]  Susan Rebstock Williams,et al.  Group Support Systems, Power, and Influence in an Organization: A Field Study , 1997 .

[70]  M. D. Myers,et al.  A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project , 1994 .

[71]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[72]  E. M. Trauth,et al.  Achieving the research goal with qualitative methods: lessons learned along the way , 1997 .

[73]  L. Kołakowski.  Alienation of Reason: A History of Positivist Thought , 1968 .

[74]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[75]  A. Preston,et al.  The “problem” in and of management information systems , 1991 .