Influence of Twenty Years of Research on Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard in Italy

Abstract This study compares 12 hazard models based on dated and recent ground‐motion prediction equations (GMPEs) to evaluate the improvement provided by new equations on probabilistic seismic‐hazard assessments in Italy. To this end, a statistical procedure is applied to score the outcomes of each hazard model at 56 different accelerometric sites that have been operating for at least 25 years. This procedure, which calculates the likelihood of the outcomes of the hazard models relative to available observations, evaluates the performance of each model and, indirectly, the influence of the selected GMPEs in providing effective hazard estimates. We have found that older GMPEs tend to yield high‐frequency ground‐motion hazard values that are overconservative at shorter mean return periods and underconservative at longer ones. To identify the sources of the different behavior between older and more recent equations, the biasing of each GMPE is evaluated by comparing median predictions with observations available at two accelerometric sites where a relatively large number of ground motions from different earthquakes have been recorded and local soil conditions are well established. Results indicate that two decades of research on GMPEs have resulted in a significant reduction of bias with an improvement in the accuracy of predictions. Major improvements have been observed from 2008 to 2010. These may be related to the increased completeness of regression data sets and to an increased effectiveness of functional forms, which allow a better modeling of the physical process governing the propagation of ground motions. Since then, the GMPE bias has remained almost stable and no significant improvement in the performances of the relative hazard models has been observed. Our results also indicate that worldwide GMPEs applied to Italy are less effective at providing hazard results corroborated by observations.

[1]  S. Kramer Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[2]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Sigma: Issues, Insights, and Challenges , 2009 .

[3]  L. Luzi,et al.  Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE) , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[4]  D. Bindi,et al.  Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database , 2011 .

[5]  Maurice S. Power,et al.  An Overview of the NGA Project , 2008 .

[6]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Modifications to Existing Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Light of New Data , 2011 .

[7]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 2014 .

[8]  J. Douglas Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates , 2003 .

[9]  J. Bommer,et al.  Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[10]  S. Akkar,et al.  Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[11]  David M. Boore,et al.  Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1981 .

[12]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): A Web Portal for the Dissemination of Italian Strong-motion Data , 2008 .

[13]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[14]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Overview of the Italian strong motion database ITACA 1.0 , 2010 .

[15]  Dario Albarello,et al.  A scoring test on probabilistic seismic hazard estimates in Italy , 2014 .

[16]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA) , 2010 .

[18]  Ezio Faccioli,et al.  Updated predictive equations for broadband (0.01–10 s) horizontal response spectra and peak ground motions, based on a global dataset of digital acceleration records , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[19]  Rodolfo Puglia,et al.  Overview on the Strong‐Motion Data Recorded during the May–June 2012 Emilia Seismic Sequence , 2013 .

[20]  David M. Boore,et al.  SEA99: A Revised Ground-Motion Prediction Relation for Use in Extensional Tectonic Regimes , 2005 .

[21]  P. Bazzurro,et al.  Disaggregation of Probabilistic Ground-Motion Hazard in Italy , 2009 .

[22]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Orientation-Independent Measures of Ground Motion , 2006 .

[23]  Dario Albarello,et al.  Scoring and Testing Procedures Devoted to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment , 2015, Surveys in Geophysics.

[24]  J. Douglas,et al.  Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration , 2005 .

[25]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .

[26]  Dario Albarello,et al.  On the Influence of Horizontal Ground‐Shaking Definition on Probabilistic Seismic‐Hazard Analysis , 2015 .

[27]  Alberto Michelini,et al.  ISMD, a Web Portal for Real‐Time Processing and Dissemination of INGV Strong‐Motion Data , 2014 .

[28]  Rodolfo Puglia,et al.  Erratum to: Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[29]  J. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion , 2006 .

[30]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates? , 2006 .

[31]  P. Bragato Regression Analysis with Truncated Samples and Its Application to Ground-Motion Attenuation Studies , 2004 .

[32]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records , 2008 .

[33]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[34]  W. Silva,et al.  NGA-West2 Database , 2014 .

[35]  C. Cornell,et al.  Disaggregation of seismic hazard , 1999 .

[36]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.