Fast Bayesian approach for modal identification using free vibration data, Part i - Most probable value

Abstract The identification of modal properties from field testing of civil engineering structures is becoming economically viable, thanks to the advent of modern sensor and data acquisition technology. Its demand is driven by innovative structural designs and increased performance requirements of dynamic-prone structures that call for a close cross-checking or monitoring of their dynamic properties and responses. Existing instrumentation capabilities and modal identification techniques allow structures to be tested under free vibration, forced vibration (known input) or ambient vibration (unknown broadband loading). These tests can be considered complementary rather than competing as they are based on different modeling assumptions in the identification model and have different implications on costs and benefits. Uncertainty arises naturally in the dynamic testing of structures due to measurement noise, sensor alignment error, modeling error, etc. This is especially relevant in field vibration tests because the test condition in the field environment can hardly be controlled. In this work, a Bayesian statistical approach is developed for modal identification using the free vibration response of structures. A frequency domain formulation is proposed that makes statistical inference based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the data in a selected frequency band. This significantly simplifies the identification model because only the modes dominating the frequency band need to be included. It also legitimately ignores the information in the excluded frequency bands that are either irrelevant or difficult to model, thereby significantly reducing modeling error risk. The posterior probability density function (PDF) of the modal parameters is derived rigorously from modeling assumptions and Bayesian probability logic. Computational difficulties associated with calculating the posterior statistics, including the most probable value (MPV) and the posterior covariance matrix, are addressed. Fast computational algorithms for determining the MPV are proposed so that the method can be practically implemented. In the companion paper (Part II), analytical formulae are derived for the posterior covariance matrix so that it can be evaluated without resorting to finite difference method. The proposed method is verified using synthetic data. It is also applied to modal identification of full-scale field structures.

[1]  James L. Beck,et al.  Determining models of structures from earthquake records , 1978 .

[2]  J. Lardies,et al.  On using the wavelet transform in modal analysis , 2001 .

[3]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Bayesian Fast Fourier Transform Approach for Modal Updating Using Ambient Data , 2003 .

[4]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings , 2003 .

[5]  W. Gander.  Least squares with a quadratic constraint , 1980 .

[6]  Massimo Ruzzene,et al.  NATURAL FREQUENCIES AND DAMPINGS IDENTIFICATION USING WAVELET TRANSFORM: APPLICATION TO REAL DATA , 1997 .

[7]  Wenliang Zhou,et al.  Generalized Eigenvalue Decomposition in Time Domain Modal Parameter Identification , 2008 .

[8]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Hongtao Wang,et al.  Structural modal parameter identification and damage diagnosis based on Hilbert-Huang transform , 2014, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[10]  S. Au.  Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part I: Posterior most probable value , 2012 .

[11]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Full-scale dynamic testing and modal identification of a coupled floor slab system , 2012 .

[12]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Bayesian operational modal analysis: Theory, computation, practice , 2013 .

[13]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fast Bayesian FFT Method for Ambient Modal Identification with Separated Modes , 2011 .

[14]  Thomas G. Carne,et al.  The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines , 1993 .

[15]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[16]  Shih-Lin Hung,et al.  A Wavelet‐Based Approach to Identifying Structural Modal Parameters from Seismic Response and Free Vibration Data , 2005 .

[17]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Experimental methods for estimating modal mass in footbridges using human-induced dynamic excitation , 2007 .

[18]  Brian F. Feeny,et al.  APPLICATION OF PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION TO STRUCTURAL VIBRATION ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[19]  Heung-Fai Lam,et al.  Fast Bayesian approach for modal identification using free vibration data, Part II—Posterior uncertainty and application , 2016 .

[20]  Michael Feldman,et al.  NON-LINEAR FREE VIBRATION IDENTIFICATION VIA THE HILBERT TRANSFORM , 1997 .

[21]  T. Le,et al.  Continuous wavelet transform for modal identification using free decay response , 2004 .

[22]  Nobuyuki Sasaki,et al.  FIELD VIBRATION TEST OF A LONG-SPAN CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE BY LARGE EXCITERS , 1992 .

[23]  E. C. Mikulcik,et al.  A method for the direct identification of vibration parameters from the free response , 1977 .

[24]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Modal identification of a suspension footbridge using free vibration signatures , 2005 .

[25]  Siu-Kui Au.  Assembling mode shapes by least squares , 2011 .

[26]  G. Kerschen,et al.  PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE PROPER ORTHOGONAL MODES USING THE SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION , 2002 .

[27]  W. Gander,et al.  A Constrained Eigenvalue Problem , 1989 .

[28]  Bor-Tsuen Wang,et al.  Modal analysis by free vibration response only for discrete and continuous systems , 2011 .

[29]  Bor-Tsuen Wang,et al.  Modal analysis of mdof system by using free vibration response data only , 2008 .

[30]  B. Feeny,et al.  On the physical interpretation of proper orthogonal modes in vibrations , 1998 .

[31]  David L. Brown,et al.  Parameter Estimation Techniques for Modal Analysis , 1979 .

[32]  Fabrizio Vestroni,et al.  Dynamic identification of a masonry building using forced vibration tests , 2005 .

[33]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[34]  Joseph Lardies,et al.  Identification of modal parameters using the wavelet transform , 2002 .

[35]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Process Control , 2000 .