Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation

In this paper, we present findings on moderation of synchronous, small-group argumentation in blended, co-located learning environments. Drawing on findings from the literature on human facilitation of dialogue in face-to-face settings, we first elaborate on the potential promise of this new practice. However, little is known about what constitutes effective human facilitation in synchronous e-discussions. A multi-method exploratory approach was then adopted to provide first insights into some of the difficulties and characteristics of moderation in these settings. To this end, we focused on (1) students’ perspectives on what constitutes effective e-moderation of synchronous peer argumentation in classrooms and (2) the relations between characteristics of actual and perceived moderation effectiveness. The analyses presented in this paper reveal that the role of the e-moderator in synchronous peer discussions is a complex one and that expectations from e-moderators seem at times even contradictory. Also, comparisons with findings on moderation in other communication formats (e.g., asynchronous, face-to-face) show that insights on effective instructional practices in these formats cannot be simply transferred to synchronous communication formats. We close this paper by briefly describing a tool that provides real-time support for e-moderators of synchronous group discussions, and whose development had been sparked by these findings in a further cycle of our design research program. Several questions and hypotheses are articulated to be investigated in future research, both with these new tools and in general.

[1]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[2]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. , 1995 .

[3]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Discourse Patterns During Children's Collaborative Online Discussions , 2007 .

[4]  Lee-Ellen Marvin,et al.  Spoof, Spam, Lurk and Lag: the Aesthetics of Text-based Virtual Realities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[6]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[7]  C. Vleuten,et al.  Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research , 2002, Medical teacher.

[8]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .

[9]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  R. Gillies.  Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms , 2003 .

[11]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[12]  Jennifer O'Rourke,et al.  Tutoring Large Numbers: An Unmet Challenge , 2004 .

[13]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation , 2005 .

[14]  S. Michaels,et al.  Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life , 2008 .

[15]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Goals and Strategies of a Problem-based Learning Facilitator , 2006 .

[16]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education , 2004 .

[17]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate? , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[18]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[19]  Frank V. Novello.  Behavioral Objectives: Validity Through Verbs , 1975 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion , 2001 .

[21]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Teaching and Learning Argumentation , 2007, The Elementary School Journal.

[22]  Christopher Miller,et al.  Student and Tutor Perspectives of On-Line Moderation , 2006 .

[23]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Computer supported moderation of e-discussions: the ARGUNAUT approach , 2007, CSCL.

[24]  Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont,et al.  Argumentation and education : theoretical foundations and practices , 2009 .

[25]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[26]  Erna Yackel,et al.  What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation , 2002 .

[27]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration , 2008 .

[28]  Vic Lally,et al.  Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher , 2007 .

[29]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! , 2000 .

[30]  Maggie McPherson and Miguel Baptista Nunes.  The Role of Tutors as a Integral Part of Online Learning Support , 2004 .

[31]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  D. Suthers.  Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. , 2003 .

[33]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms , 2010 .

[34]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Argumentation in a changing world , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[35]  Sunyoung Joung,et al.  Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Robert Tinker,et al.  Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators , 2000 .

[37]  Markku Niemivirta,et al.  Approaches for analysing tutor's role in a networked inquiry discourse , 2001 .

[38]  Jim Hewitt.  How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads , 2003 .

[39]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. , 2000 .

[40]  Brigitte Denis,et al.  Roles and Competencies of the e-Tutor , 2004 .

[41]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Learning through synchronous electronic discussion , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[42]  G. M. van der Aalsvoort.  New perspectives in learning and instruction. , 1999 .

[43]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  The effects of adult guidance and peer discussion on the development of children's representations: evidence from the training of pedestrian skills. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[44]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[45]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[46]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Transformation of Knowledge through Classroom Interaction , 2009 .

[47]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  The Role of the Tutor in Asynchronous Discussion Boards: A Case Study of a Pre-Service Teacher Course , 2003 .

[48]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom: The Realities of Online Teaching , 2001 .

[49]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  A. King,et al.  Effects of Guided Cooperative Questioning on Children's Knowledge Construction. , 1993 .

[51]  S. Aisha Walker,et al.  Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[52]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  E-Moderation of Synchronous Discussions in Educational Settings: A Nascent Practice , 2011 .

[53]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in CSCL-based argumentation , 2007 .

[54]  Bruce M. McLaren,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Learning and E-Discussions Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques , 2010, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[55]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[56]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Representational Tools in Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation-Based Learning: How Dyads Work With Constructed and Inspected Argumentative Diagrams , 2007 .

[57]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory , 2007 .

[58]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[59]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Human guidance of synchronous E-discussions: the effects of different moderation scripts on peer argumentation , 2009, CSCL.

[60]  Maria Kordaki,et al.  Successful E-Courses: The Role of Synchronous Communication and E-Moderation via Chat. , 2006 .

[61]  Nasser Mansour,et al.  Exploring creative thinking in graphically mediated synchronous dialogues , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[62]  Sherri L. Condon,et al.  Discourse Management Strategies in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Decision Making Interactions , 1996 .

[63]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The role of argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue , 2009 .

[64]  G. Giles K. Salmon.  Training virtual management teachers , 1997 .

[65]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[66]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Competences for online teaching: A special report , 2001 .

[67]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Observing Tutorial Dialogues Collaboratively: Insights About Human Tutoring Effectiveness From Vicarious Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[68]  R. Mason,et al.  Mindweave : communication, computers and distance education , 1989 .

[69]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[70]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners , 1995 .

[71]  Sandra Katz,et al.  The cognitive skill of coaching collaboration , 1999, CSCL.

[72]  N. Mercer,et al.  Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science , 2004 .

[73]  Robyn M. Gillies,et al.  The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning , 2004 .

[74]  Elaine B. Coleman,et al.  Using Explanatory Knowledge During Collaborative Problem Solving in Science , 1998 .

[75]  R. Gillies,et al.  Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem‐solving and learning during small‐group work , 2009 .

[76]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[77]  N. Webb.  The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[78]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Impact of temporal extension, synchronicity, and group size on computer-supported information exchange , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  Christa S. C. Asterhan,et al.  Online and face-to-face discussions in the classroom: a study on the experiences of 'active' and 'silent' students , 2009, CSCL.

[80]  Bob Rehder,et al.  Causal-Based Property Generalization , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[81]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[82]  Cj Howe.  Expert support for group work in elementary science: the role of consensus. , 2009 .

[83]  Rex E. Wallace,et al.  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 , 2001 .

[84]  Margaret Mazzolini,et al.  Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[85]  David R. Moore,et al.  Building Interactivity into Web Courses: Tools for Social and Instructional Interaction. , 1998 .

[86]  K. Lund.  Human support in CSCL: what, for whom, and by whom? , 2004 .

[87]  M. Chiu.  Adapting Teacher Interventions to Student Needs During Cooperative Learning: How to Improve Student Problem Solving and Time On-Task , 2004 .

[88]  M. Baker,et al.  Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions , 2002 .