Morphological plasticity of wheat and barley roots in response to spatial variation in soil strength

Root systems of individual crop plants may encounter large variations in mechanical impedance to root penetration. Split-root experiments were conducted to compare the effects of spatial variation in soil strength on the morphological plasticity of wheat and barley roots, and its relationship to shoot growth. Plants of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare cv Prisma) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv Alexandria) were grown for 12 days with their seminal roots divided between two halves of a cylinder packed with sandy loam soil. Three treatment combinations were imposed: loose soil where both halves of the cylinder were packed to 1.1 g cm−3 (penetrometer resistance 0.3 MPa), dense soil where both halves were packed to 1.4 g cm−3 (penetrometer resistance 1 MPa), and a split-root treatment where one half was packed to 1.1 and the other to 1.4 g cm−3. In barley, uniform high soil strength restricted the extension of main seminal root axes more than laterals. In the split-root treatment, the length of laterals and the dry weight of main axes and laterals were increased in the loose soil half and reduced in the dense soil half compared with their respective loose and dense-soil controls. No such compensatory adjustments between main axis and laterals and between individual seminal roots were found in wheat. Variation in soil strength had no effect on the density of lateral roots (number per unit main axis length) in either barley or wheat. The nature and extent of wheat root plasticity in response to variation in soil strength was very different from that in response to changes in N-supply in previous experiments. In spite of the compensatory adjustments in growth between individual seminal roots of barley, the growth of barley shoots, as in wheat, was reduced when part of the root system was in compacted soil.

[1]  L. Pagès,et al.  Why are laterals less affected than main axes by homogeneous unfavourable physical conditions? A model-based hypothesis , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[2]  R. Misra,et al.  Growth and morphology of eucalypt seedling-roots, in relation to soil strength arising from compaction , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[3]  I. Bingham,et al.  Relationship between tissue sugar content, phloem import and lateral root initiation in wheat , 1998 .

[4]  C. Black,et al.  Does root‐sourced ABA have a role in mediating growth and stomatal responses to soil compaction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)? , 1999 .

[5]  D. Robinson.  The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[6]  M. Drew,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A LOCALISED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE, NITRATE, AMMONIUM AND POTASSIUM ON THE GROWTH OF THE SEMINAL ROOT SYSTEM, AND THE SHOOT, IN BARLEY , 1975 .

[7]  R. Scott Russell,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Impedance on Root Growth in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) III. OBSERVATIONS ON THE MECHANISM OF RESPONSE , 1980 .

[8]  D. J. Campbell,et al.  Soil and crop responses to zero- and conventional-traffic systems for winter barley in Scotland, 1982–1986 , 1990 .

[9]  J. Masle.  Genetic Variation in the Effects of Root Impedance on Growth and Transpiration Rates of Wheat and Barley , 1992 .

[10]  C. Black,et al.  Effect of soil compaction on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth: I. Possible role for ABA as a root-sourced chemical signal , 1996 .

[11]  B. Tudzynski.  Plant Responses to Environmental Stresses: From Phytohormones to Genome Reorganization , 2001 .

[12]  B. Forde,et al.  An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. , 1998, Science.

[13]  C. Black,et al.  Novel approaches for examining the effects of differential soil compaction on xylem sap abscisic acid concentration, stomatal conductance and growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 1999 .

[14]  J. Conroy,et al.  The position of localized soil compaction determines root and subsequent shoot growth responses. , 2001, Journal of experimental botany.

[15]  I. Bingham,et al.  Site, Scale and Time-course for Adjustments in Lateral Root Initiation in Wheat Following Changes in C and N Supply , 1997 .

[16]  M. Jackson,et al.  Ethylene and the responses of roots of maize (Zea mays L.) to physical impedance , 1988 .

[17]  L. Pagès.  How to include organ interactions in models of the root system architecture? The concept of endogenous environment. , 2000 .

[18]  A. T. P. Bennie,et al.  Growth and mechanical impedance , 1991 .

[19]  R. Hunt.  Plant growth analysis , 1980 .

[20]  C. Hackett.  A Method of Applying Nutrients Locally to Roots Under Controlled Conditions, and Some Morphological Effects of Locally Applied Nitrate on the Branching of Wheat Roots , 1972 .

[21]  M. Gersani,et al.  Development correlations between roots in heterogeneous environments , 1992 .

[22]  A. G. Bengough,et al.  Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses , 1990 .

[23]  C. Mullins,et al.  Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenne L., Agrostis capillaris and Trifolium repens L. , 1996 .

[24]  D. Tennant,et al.  A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length , 1975 .

[25]  Michael J. Goss,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Impedance on Root Growth in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. )I. EFFECTS ON THE ELONGATION AND BRANCHING OF SEMINAL ROOT AXES , 1977 .

[26]  W. R. Jordan,et al.  Ethylene Evolution from Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedling Roots and Shoots in Response to Mechanical Impedance. , 1991, Plant physiology.

[27]  M. J. Go,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Impedance on Root Growth in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 1980 .

[28]  O. Bethenod,et al.  Xylem ABA controls the stomatal conductance of field‐grown maize subjected to soil compaction or soil drying , 1992 .