The signature of chemical valence in the electrical conduction through a single-atom contact

Fabrication of structures at the atomic scale is now possible using state-of-the-art techniques for manipulating individual atoms, and it may become possible to design electrical circuits atom by atom. A prerequisite for successful design is a knowledge of the relationship between the macroscopic electrical characteristics of such circuits and the quantum properties of the individual atoms used as building blocks. As a first step, we show here that the chemical valence determines the conduction properties of the simplest imaginable circuit—a one-atom contact between two metallic banks. The extended quantum states that carry the current from one bank to the other necessarily proceed through the valence orbitals of the constriction atom. It thus seems reasonable to conjecture that the number of current-carrying modes (or ‘channels’) of a one-atom contact is determined by the number of available valence orbitals, and so should strongly differ for metallic elements in different series of the periodic table. We have tested this conjecture using scanning tunnelling microscopy and mechanically controllable break-junction techniques, to obtain atomic-size constrictions for four different metallic elements (Pb, Al, Nb and Au), covering a broad range of valences and orbital structures. Our results demonstrate unambiguously a direct link between valence orbitals and the number of conduction channels in one-atom contacts.

[1]  T. M. Klapwijk,et al.  Subharmonic energy-gap structure in superconducting constrictions , 1983 .

[2]  J. M. Ruitenbeek.  Quantum Point Contacts Between Metals , 1997 .

[3]  Michel Devoret,et al.  Adjustable nanofabricated atomic size contacts , 1996 .

[4]  V. Shumeiko,et al.  DC-CURRENT TRANSPORT AND AC JOSEPHSON EFFECT IN QUANTUM JUNCTIONS AT LOW VOLTAGE , 1997 .

[5]  M F Crommie,et al.  Confinement of Electrons to Quantum Corrals on a Metal Surface , 1993, Science.

[6]  Michel Devoret,et al.  Conduction Channel Transmissions of Atomic-Size Aluminum Contacts , 1997 .

[7]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  Conductance eigenchannels in nanocontacts , 1997 .

[8]  Sutton,et al.  Jumps in electronic conductance due to mechanical instabilities. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[9]  Jian Wang,et al.  Quantum transport through atomic wires , 1997 .

[10]  Averin,et al.  ac Josephson Effect in a Single Quantum Channel. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[11]  Vieira,et al.  Atomic-sized metallic contacts: Mechanical properties and electronic transport. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[12]  A. Yeyati,et al.  MICROSCOPIC ORIGIN OF CONDUCTING CHANNELS IN METALLIC ATOMIC-SIZE CONTACTS , 1997, cond-mat/9711263.

[13]  Landman,et al.  Reversible Manipulations of Room Temperature Mechanical and Quantum Transport Properties in Nanowire Junctions. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[14]  Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of superconducting quantum point contacts. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[15]  R. Landauer.  Electrical resistance of disordered one-dimensional lattices , 1970 .

[16]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[17]  J. Ruitenbeek,et al.  The signature of conductance quantization in metallic point contacts , 1995, Nature.

[18]  L. Sohn,et al.  Mesoscopic electron transport , 1997 .

[19]  Lang,et al.  Resistance of atomic wires. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[20]  Vieira,et al.  Conductance steps and quantization in atomic-size contacts. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[21]  R. Friend,et al.  Cation effects in doped La2CuO4 superconductors , 1998, Nature.