Exploring Soot Particle Concentration and Emissivity by Transient Thermocouples Measurements in Laminar Partially Premixed Coflow Flames

Soot formation in combustion represents a complex phenomenon that strongly depends on several factors such as pressure, temperature, fuel chemical composition, and the extent of premixing. The effect of partial premixing on soot formation is of relevance also for real combustion devices and still needs to be fully understood. An improved version of the thermophoretic particle densitometry (TPD) method has been used in this work with the aim to obtain both quantitative and qualitative information of soot particles generated in a set of laminar partially-premixed coflow flames characterized by different equivalence ratios. To this aim, the transient thermocouple temperature response has been analyzed to infer particle concentration and emissivity. A variety of thermal emissivity values have been measured for flame-formed carbonaceous particles, ranging from 0.4 to 0.5 for the early nucleated soot particles up to the value of 0.95, representing the typical value commonly attributed to mature soot particles, indicating that the correct determination of the thermal emissivity is necessary to accurately evaluate the particle volume fraction. This is particularly true at the early stage of the soot formation, when particle concentration measurement is indeed particularly challenging as in the central region of the diffusion flames. With increasing premixing, an initial increase of particles is detected both in the maximum radial soot volume fraction region and in the central region of the flame, while the further addition of primary air determines the particle volume fraction drop. Finally, a modeling analysis based on a sectional approach has been performed to corroborate the experimental findings.

[1]  J. Kent,et al.  Further experimental and modelling evidences of soot fragmentation in flames , 2015 .

[2]  JoAnn S. Lighty,et al.  Burnout of soot particles in a two-stage burner with a JP-8 surrogate fuel , 2012 .

[3]  M. Dubey,et al.  Light absorption properties and radiative effects of primary organic aerosol emissions. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  H. Michelsen Probing soot formation, chemical and physical evolution, and oxidation: A review of in situ diagnostic techniques and needs , 2017 .

[5]  C. McEnally,et al.  Experimental study of nonfuel hydrocarbons and soot in coflowing partially premixed ethylene/air flames , 2000 .

[6]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols , 2007 .

[7]  A. D’Anna,et al.  The evolution of soot particles in premixed and diffusion flames by thermophoretic particle densitometry , 2017 .

[8]  Robert A. Fletcher,et al.  The evolution of soot precursor particles in a diffusion flame , 1998 .

[9]  Hai Wang,et al.  On evolution of particle size distribution functions of incipient soot in premixed ethylene-oxygen-argon flames , 2008 .

[10]  D. E. Rosner,et al.  Soot volume fraction and temperature measurements in laminar nonpremixed flames using thermocouples , 1997 .

[11]  B. Ahvazi,et al.  Tunable diode-laser measurement of carbon monoxide concentration and temperature in a laminar methane-air diffusion flame. , 1993, Applied optics.

[12]  A. D’Anna,et al.  Physicochemical evolution of nascent soot particles in a laminar premixed flame: From nucleation to early growth , 2015 .

[13]  Chang-Yu Wu,et al.  Combustion Aerosols: Factors Governing Their Size and Composition and Implications to Human Health , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  Hai Wang Formation of nascent soot and other condensed-phase materials in flames , 2011 .

[15]  John Kent,et al.  Modeling Formation and Oxidation of Soot in Nonpremixed Flames , 2013 .

[16]  Anton D. Sediako,et al.  Comparison of multiple diagnostic techniques to study soot formation and morphology in a diffusion flame , 2017 .

[17]  F. El-Mahallawy,et al.  Laminar Premixed Flames , 2002 .

[18]  A. Peters,et al.  “Are we forgetting the smallest, sub 10 nm combustion generated particles?” , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[19]  A. D’Anna,et al.  Further details on particle inception and growth in premixed flames , 2015 .

[20]  J. Lighty,et al.  Temperature and oxygen effects on oxidation-induced fragmentation of soot particles , 2016 .

[21]  S. Sen,et al.  Field measurements of soot volume fractions in laminar partially premixed coflow ethylene/air flames , 2004 .

[22]  Ömer L. Gülder,et al.  Soot formation in high pressure laminar diffusion flames , 2012 .

[23]  P. Desgroux,et al.  Study of the formation of soot and its precursors in flames using optical diagnostics , 2013 .

[24]  Andrea D’Anna,et al.  Combustion-formed nanoparticles , 2009 .

[25]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  The oxidation of soot and carbon monoxide in hydrocarbon diffusion flames , 1994 .