Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development

Abstract Stakeholder interactions are increasingly viewed as an important element of research for sustainable development. But to what extent, how, and for which goals should stakeholders be involved? In this article, we explore what degrees of stakeholder interaction show the most promise in research for sustainable development. For this purpose, we examine 16 research projects from the transdisciplinary research programme NRP 61 on sustainable water management in Switzerland. The results suggest that various degrees of stakeholder interaction can be beneficial depending on each project’s intended contribution to sustainability, the form of knowledge desired, how contested the issues are, the level of actor diversity, actors’ interests, and existing collaborations between actors. We argue that systematic reflection about these six criteria can enable tailoring stakeholder interaction processes according specific project goals and context conditions.

[1]  Ian Alexander,et al.  Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  C. Pohl,et al.  Principles for designing transdisciplinary research : proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences , 2007 .

[3]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[4]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[5]  C. Pohl.  What is progress in transdisciplinary research , 2011 .

[6]  J. Tàbara,et al.  Coupling Human Information and Knowledge Systems with social-ecological systems change: Reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability , 2013 .

[7]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[8]  Carlo Jaeger,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in sustainability science—A critical view , 2016 .

[9]  Hans Hurni,et al.  Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives , 2011 .

[10]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[11]  D. Lang,et al.  A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science , 2013 .

[12]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research , 2008 .

[13]  C. Pohl,et al.  Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research , 2006 .

[14]  Judit Lienert,et al.  Meeting the Challenges of Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production for Sustainable Water Governance , 2013 .

[15]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[16]  A. D. Giulio,et al.  Transdisziplinär forschen - zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis : Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen , 2016 .

[17]  P. Strohschneider.  Zur Politik der Transformativen Wissenschaft , 2014 .

[18]  Malin Mobjörk.  Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research , 2010 .

[19]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Transformational Sustainability Research Methodology , 2016 .

[20]  M. Shaha,et al.  Transdisziplinäre Forschung. Integrative Forschungsprozesse verstehen und bewerten , 2010 .

[21]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[22]  A. Grunwald.  Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society , 2004 .

[23]  Petra Döll,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in support of land and water management in China and Southeast Asia: evaluation of four research projects , 2016, Sustainability Science.

[24]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[25]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization , 2012 .

[26]  S. Rist,et al.  Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[27]  H. Bradbury.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2007 .

[28]  D. Telfer.  The Brundtland Report ( , 2012 .

[29]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region , 2008 .

[30]  U. Flick.  Qualitative Sozialforschung : eine Einführung , 2007 .

[31]  Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn,et al.  Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: a framework , 2011, Sustainability Science.

[32]  Michael Lehning,et al.  Enabling effective problem-oriented research for sustainable development , 2012 .

[33]  S. V. D. Hel,et al.  New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth , 2016 .

[34]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.