Structural Latent Class Models

Linear logistic latent class analysis (LCA) relates the item latent probabilities of LCA to basic parameters representing the effects of explanatory variables. Applications of this model to dichotomous data comprise paired comparisons (the compared objects are the explanatory variables); the measurement of change due to, for example, therapeutic interventions (the treatments are the explanatory variables); simple scaling models of the Rasch type (the item difficulties and the person abilities are the explanatory variables); and similar models that try to explain the item difficulties by a hypothesized item structure (the cognitive operations needed to solve the items are the explanatory variables). The two latter types of models approximate the Rasch model and the linear logistic test model (LLTM), respectively, and become equivalent to these models for a sufficiently large number of classes. The same principle of semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation allows one to approximate the mixed Rasch model with its class-specific item difficulties and the mixed LLTM with its class-specific operation difficulties. Generalizations of linear logistic LCA include models for dichotomous items having varying discriminatory power and/or being affected by guessing (three-parameter linear logistic LCA) and models for the analysis of polytomous data.

[1]  Jürgen Rost,et al.  A latent class model for rating data , 1985 .

[2]  Jürgen Rost,et al.  A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses , 1991 .

[3]  R. Davidson On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Accommodate Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments , 1970 .

[4]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  On scaling models applied to data from several groups , 1986 .

[5]  Anton K. Formann,et al.  Linear Logistic Latent Class Analysis , 1982 .

[6]  J. Kiefer,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR IN THE PRESENCE OF INFINITELY MANY INCIDENTAL PARAMETERS , 1956 .

[7]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation in the Rasch Model and Related Exponential Response Models, Including a Simple Latent Class Model for Item Analysis , 1991 .

[8]  L. A. Goodman Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[9]  L. A. Goodman The Analysis of Systems of Qualitative Variables When Some of the Variables Are Unobservable. Part I-A Modified Latent Structure Approach , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Dean Follmann,et al.  Consistent estimation in the rasch model based on nonparametric margins , 1988 .

[11]  George B. Macready,et al.  Concomitant-Variable Latent-Class Models , 1988 .

[12]  Norman Verhelst,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Generalized Rasch Models , 1986 .

[13]  George B. Macready,et al.  The Use of Loglinear Models for Assessing Differential Item Functioning Across Manifest and Latent Examinee Groups , 1990 .

[14]  Jürgen Rost,et al.  Rasch Models in Latent Classes: An Integration of Two Approaches to Item Analysis , 1990 .

[15]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  A New Model for Scaling Response Patterns: An Application of the Quasi-Independence Concept , 1975 .

[16]  A. Formann Constrained latent class models: Some further applications† , 1989 .

[17]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis of a Set of Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 1984 .

[18]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents , 1980 .

[19]  A. Formann Linear Logistic Latent Class Analysis for Polytomous Data , 1992 .

[20]  Charles H. Proctor,et al.  A probabilistic formulation and statistical analysis of guttman scaling , 1970 .

[21]  Jürgen Rost,et al.  Rating scale analysis with latent class models , 1988 .

[22]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .

[23]  M. Espeland,et al.  Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements. , 1989, Biometrics.

[24]  G. H. Fischer,et al.  The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research , 1973 .

[25]  M A Young,et al.  Establishing Diagnostic Criteria for Mania , 1983, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.