The *whether Puzzle

This paper offers an account of the fact that certain verbs license wh-questions as their complement but not whether-questions. For instance, it is felicitous to say It is surprising who Bill had invited but not to say It is surprising whether Bill had invited his wife. We refer to this contrast as the *whether puzzle. We propose an account which crucially rests on the assumption that the relevant kind of verbs are sensitive to the semantic objects that their complement clause brings into salience, rather than just its truth/resolution conditions. It has been argued in previous work that the semantic objects that matrix questions bring into salience are important to understand the role of such questions in discourse. The present paper is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to argue that this aspect of meaning is also crucial for understanding the role of embedded questions in grammar.1

[1]  Nadine Theiler,et al.  A Multitude of Answers: Embedded Questions in Typed Inquisitive Semantics , 2014 .

[2]  Paul Egré,et al.  QUESTION-EMBEDDING AND FACTIVITY , 2008 .

[3]  Benjamin George,et al.  Question Embedding and the Semantics of Answers , 2011 .

[4]  Maribel Romero Surprise-predicates, strong exhaustivity and alternative questions , 2015 .

[5]  Maribel Romero Concealed Questions with Quantifiers , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[6]  Quantified concealed questions , 2013 .

[7]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Interpreting concealed questions , 2011 .

[8]  E. Chemla,et al.  Experiments on the acceptability and possible readings of questions embedded under emotive-factives , 2017 .

[9]  Kjell Johan Sæbø A Whether Forecast , 2005, TbiLLC.

[10]  Anna Szabolcsi Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings , 1997 .

[11]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[12]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Towards a Logic of Information Exchange - An Inquisitive Witness Semantics , 2011, TbiLLC.

[13]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Polar initiatives and polarity particle responses in an inquisitive discourse model ∗ , 2012 .

[14]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Polarity particle responses as a window onto the interpretation of questions and assertions , 2015 .

[15]  L. Nathan,et al.  On the interpretation of concealed questions , 2006 .

[16]  Andreea Cristina Nicolae,et al.  Any Questions? Polarity as a Window into the Structure of Questions , 2013 .

[17]  Ivano Ciardelli,et al.  A First-Order Inquisitive Semantics , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[18]  M. Schwager Keeping prices low: an answer to a concealed question , 2008 .

[19]  Matthijs Westera,et al.  Exhaustivity Through the Maxim of Relation , 2013, JSAI-isAI Workshops.

[20]  Benjamin Spector,et al.  A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: an answer, not necessarily the answer , 2015, Synthese.

[21]  Nathan Klinedinst,et al.  Exhaustivity in questions with non-factives , 2011 .

[22]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Inquisitive Semantics: A New Notion of Meaning , 2013, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[23]  C. L. Hamblin QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH , 1976 .

[24]  K Abels,et al.  Why surprise-predicates do not embed polar interrogatives. , 2004 .

[25]  Yael Sharvit,et al.  A question of strength: on NPIs in interrogative clauses , 2007 .

[26]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[27]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Division of Labor in the Interpretation of Declaratives and Interrogatives , 2017, J. Semant..

[28]  Kyle Rawlins,et al.  Responding to alternative and polar questions , 2012 .

[29]  David I. Beaver,et al.  6: The Dynamics of Topic and Focus , 2007 .

[30]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  For a Structured Meaning Account of Questions and Answers , 2001 .

[31]  이정민,et al.  궁금 의미론(Inquisitive Semantics) , 2012 .

[32]  L. Karttunen Syntax and Semantics of Questions , 1977 .

[33]  Pranav Anand,et al.  Factivity, Belief and Discourse ⇤ , 2014 .

[34]  FRANZ-JOSEF D’AVIS,et al.  On the interpretation of wh-clauses in exclamative environments , 2002 .

[35]  Elena Guerzoni Weak Exhaustivity and 'Whether': A Pragmatic Approach , 2007 .