Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sunil V. Rao | S. Yusuf | D. Xavier | Á. Avezum | B. Lewis | P. Gao | M. Niemelä | A. Budaj | J. Cairns | S. Mehta | Rizwan Afzal | P. Steg | S. Jolly | P. Widimsky | C. Joyner | S. Chrolavicius | K. Niemelä | V. Valentín | S. Rao
[1] S. Yusuf,et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial , 2010, The Lancet.
[2] P. Post,et al. The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, European heart journal.
[3] Sunil V. Rao,et al. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] Ya‐wei Xu,et al. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, Saudi medical journal.
[5] L. Wilkins. 2009 Late-Breaking Clinical Trial/Science Abstracts From the AHA Scientific Sessions 2009 , 2009 .
[6] D. Bandorski,et al. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[7] S. Yusuf,et al. Design and rationale of CURRENT-OASIS 7: a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial trial evaluating optimal dosing strategies for clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with ST and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy. , 2008, American heart journal.
[8] E. Vicaut,et al. Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing PCI. Results of the RIVIERA study. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.
[9] S. Yusuf,et al. Improving clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2008, European heart journal.
[10] Fang-Shu Ou,et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[11] Yu-jie Zhou,et al. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2008, Chinese medical journal.
[12] J D Hilton,et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) , 2008, Heart.
[13] Adelaide,et al. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] S. Yusuf,et al. Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2006, Circulation.
[15] Salim Yusuf,et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[16] R. Califf,et al. Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[17] A. Ziakas,et al. Comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.
[18] W Klein,et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). , 2002, European heart journal.
[19] D. Wennberg,et al. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. , 2000, JAMA.
[20] S. Werns. Dose Comparisons of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2011 .
[21] Salim Yusuf,et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2009, American heart journal.