Benefits of two mitigation strategies for container vessels: cleaner engines and cleaner fuels.

Emissions from ocean-going vessels (OGVs) are a significant health concern for people near port communities. This paper reports the emission benefits for two mitigation strategies, cleaner engines and cleaner fuels, for a 2010 container vessel. In-use emissions were measured following International Organization for Standardization (ISO) protocols. The overall in-use nitrogen oxide (NO(x)) emission factor was 16.1 ± 0.1 gkW(-1) h(-1), lower than the Tier 1 certification (17 gkW(-1) h(-1)) and significantly lower than the benchmark value of 18.7 gkW(-1) h(-1) commonly used for estimating emission inventories. The in-use particulate matter (PM(2.5)) emission was 1.42 ± 0.04 gkW(-1) h(-1) for heavy fuel oil (HFO) containing 2.51 wt % sulfur. Unimodal (∼30 nm) and bimodal (∼35 nm; ∼75 nm) particle number size distributions (NSDs) were observed when the vessel operated on marine gas oil (MGO) and HFO, respectively. First-time emission measurements during fuel switching (required 24 nautical miles from coastline) showed that concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) and particle NSD took ∼55 min to reach steady-state when switching from MGO to HFO and ∼84 min in the opposite direction. Therefore, if OGVs commence fuel change at the regulated boundary, then vessels can travel up to 90% of the distance to the port before steady-state values are re-established. The transient behavior follows a classic, nonlinear mixing function driven by the amount of fuel in day tank and the fuel consumption rate. Hence, to achieve the maximum benefits from a fuel change regulation, fuel switch boundary should be further increased to provide the intended benefits for the people living near the ports.

[1]  K. R. Arrigo,et al.  Impacts of Atmospheric Anthropogenic Nitrogen on the Open Ocean , 2008, Science.

[2]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships , 1999 .

[3]  A. Nenes,et al.  ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K + –Ca 2+ –Mg 2+ –NH 4 + –Na + –SO 4 2− –NO 3 − –Cl − –H 2 O aerosols , 2007 .

[4]  Erin H. Green,et al.  Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  William A. Welch,et al.  Emission measurements from a crude oil tanker at sea. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J Wayne Miller,et al.  Primary particulate matter from ocean-going engines in the Southern California Air Basin. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  J J Corbett,et al.  Mitigating the health impacts of pollution from oceangoing shipping: an assessment of low-sulfur fuel mandates. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Primary particles in ship emissions , 2008 .

[9]  Rodica A. Baranescu,et al.  Influence of Fuel Sulfur on Diesel Particulate Emissions , 1988 .

[10]  E. Fridell,et al.  Characterisation of particulate matter and gaseous emissions from a large ship diesel engine , 2009 .

[11]  David R. Cocker,et al.  In-use gaseous and particulate matter emissions from a modern ocean going container vessel , 2008 .

[12]  A. Nenes,et al.  ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols , 1998 .

[13]  H. Burtscher,et al.  Particulate Emissions from a Low-Speed Marine Diesel Engine , 2007 .

[14]  David R. Cocker,et al.  Emissions from main propulsion engine on container ship at sea , 2010 .

[15]  Esko I. Kauppinen,et al.  Aerosol characterisation in medium-speed diesel engines operating with heavy fuel oils , 1999 .

[16]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Assessment of near-future policy instruments for oceangoing shipping: impact on atmospheric aerosol burdens and the earth's radiation budget. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  William A. Welch,et al.  Comprehensive simultaneous shipboard and airborne characterization of exhaust from a modern container ship at sea. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Zang-Ho Shon,et al.  Influence of ship emissions on ozone concentrations around coastal areas during summer season , 2010 .

[19]  F Fleischer,et al.  Physical properties, chemical composition, and cloud forming potential of particulate emissions from a marine diesel engine at various load conditions. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean , 1999, Nature.

[21]  E. Kauppinen,et al.  The effect of Mg-based additive on aerosol characteristics in medium-speed diesel engines operating with residual fuel oils , 2002 .