LARGE POPULATION SIZE PREDICTS THE DISTRIBUTION OF ASEXUALITY IN SCALE INSECTS

Understanding why some organisms reproduce by sexual reproduction while others can reproduce asexually remains an important unsolved problem in evolutionary biology. Simple demography suggests that asexuals should outcompete sexually reproducing organisms, because of their higher intrinsic rate of increase. However, the majority of multicellular organisms have sexual reproduction. The widely accepted explanation for this apparent contradiction is that asexual lineages have a higher extinction rate. A number of models have indicated that population size might play a crucial role in the evolution of asexuality. The strength of processes that lead to extinction of asexual species is reduced when population sizes get very large, so that the long‐term advantage of sexual over asexual reproduction may become negligible. Here, we use a comparative approach using scale insects (Coccoidea, Hemiptera) to show that asexuality is indeed more common in species with larger population density and geographic distribution and we also show that asexual species tend to be more polyphagous. We discuss the implication of our findings for previously observed patterns of asexuality in agricultural pests.

[1]  C. Waddington,et al.  “Animal Cytology and Evolution” , 1955, Nature.

[2]  P. Keightley,et al.  Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations , 2006, Nature.

[3]  Douglass R. Miller,et al.  Introduced scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of the United States and their impact on U.S. agriculture , 2005 .

[4]  J. Logsdon,et al.  Accelerated mutation accumulation in asexual lineages of a freshwater snail. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  Richard G FitzJohn,et al.  Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. , 2009, Systematic biology.

[6]  J. Andersen,et al.  Discovery of cryptic species among North American pine‐feeding Chionaspis scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) , 2011 .

[7]  D. Tilman,et al.  Sexuality and the Components of Environmental Uncertainty: Clues from Geographic Parthenogenesis in Terrestrial Animals , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[8]  C. Lively,et al.  Running with the Red Queen: Host-Parasite Coevolution Selects for Biparental Sex , 2011, Science.

[9]  B. Normark The evolution of alternative genetic systems in insects. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[10]  B. Crespi,et al.  Deleterious mutation accumulation in asexual Timema stick insects. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  M. Lynch Destabilizing Hybridization, General-Purpose Genotypes and Geographic Parthenogenesis , 1984, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[12]  Dany Azar,et al.  Scale insects from Lower Cretaceous amber of Lebanon (hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccinea) , 2008 .

[13]  Douglass R. Miller SELECTED SCALE INSECT GROUPS (HEMIPTERA: COCCOIDEA) IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF THE UNITED STATES , 2005 .

[14]  D. Maddison,et al.  Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6 , 2009 .

[15]  Aaron Christ,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[16]  I. A. Gavrilov A catalog of chromosome numbers and genetic systems of scale insects (Homoptera: Coccinea) of the world , 2007 .

[17]  Gerard Talavera,et al.  Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[18]  Jarrod Had MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package , 2010 .

[19]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  Geographical Parthenogenesis: General Purpose Genotypes and Frozen Niche Variation , 2009 .

[20]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Primate ecology and social organization , 2009 .

[21]  P. Gullan,et al.  Adaptations in scale insects. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[22]  M. Lynch,et al.  The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[23]  M. Lynch METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  P. Damlen,et al.  Gibbs sampling for Bayesian non‐conjugate and hierarchical models by using auxiliary variables , 1999 .

[25]  Kazutaka Katoh,et al.  Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..

[26]  A. Weeks,et al.  Parthenogenesis in the Aspidiotus nerii Complex (Hemiptera: Diaspididae): A Single Origin of a Worldwide, Polyphagous Lineage Associated with Cardinium Bacteria , 2005 .

[27]  A. Møller,et al.  Testing and adjusting for publication bias , 2001 .

[28]  P. Bierzychudek Patterns in plant parthenogenesis , 1985, Experientia.

[29]  C. Lively A review of Red Queen models for the persistence of obligate sexual reproduction. , 2010, The Journal of heredity.

[30]  Linda Partridge The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality, Graham Bell. Croom Helm, London and Canberra (1982), 635, Price £25.00 , 1983 .

[31]  A. Rambaut,et al.  BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[32]  Duhong Chen,et al.  The PhyLoTA Browser: processing GenBank for molecular phylogenetics research. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[33]  D. Rosen Armored scale insects: their biology, natural enemies and control. Volume B. , 1990 .

[34]  R. H.J.MULLE THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE , 2002 .

[35]  S. Otto,et al.  The Evolutionary Enigma of Sex , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[36]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[37]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[38]  U. Nur Parthenogenesis in Coccids (Homoptera) , 1971 .

[39]  H. Muller Some Genetic Aspects of Sex , 1932, The American Naturalist.

[40]  A. Agrawal Evolution of Sex: Why Do Organisms Shuffle Their Genotypes? , 2006, Current Biology.

[41]  W. Rice,et al.  A Graphical Approach to Lineage Selection Between Clonals and Sexuals , 2009 .

[42]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[43]  A. Weeks,et al.  A high incidence of parthenogenesis in agricultural pests , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  N. Johnson,et al.  Niche explosion , 2010, Genetica.

[45]  S. Miller,et al.  Arthropods of Tropical Forests: Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy , 2008 .

[46]  A. Saura,et al.  Cytology and evolution in parthenogenesis , 1987 .

[47]  Geoffrey E. Morse,et al.  A phylogenetic analysis of armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), based upon nuclear, mitochondrial, and endosymbiont gene sequences. , 2010, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[48]  E. Charnov,et al.  ON IRREVERSIBLE EVOLUTION , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  D. Rosen Armored scale insects: their biology, natural enemies and control, vol. A - (World crop pests; 4A) , 1989 .

[50]  S. Miller,et al.  Diel, seasonal and disturbance-induced variation in invertebrate assemblages. , 2003 .

[51]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Comparing parent–offspring regression with frequentist and Bayesian animal models to estimate heritability in wild populations: a simulation study for Gaussian and binary traits , 2013 .

[52]  C. Lively,et al.  The Cost of Biparental Sex Under Individual Selection , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[53]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[54]  N. Moran,et al.  Genomic signatures of ancient asexual lineages , 2003 .

[55]  J. Jaenike,et al.  An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations , 1978 .

[56]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Geoffrey E. Morse,et al.  A molecular phylogenetic study of armoured scale insects (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) , 2005 .

[58]  W. Hamilton Sex versus non-sex versus parasite , 1980 .

[59]  Peter E Midford,et al.  Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[60]  T. Schowalter,et al.  Canopy Arthropod Assemblages in Four Overstory and Three Understory Plant Species in a Mixed-Conifer Old-Growth Forest in California , 2005, Forest Science.

[61]  J. Hadfield,et al.  General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[62]  M. Lundmark,et al.  Asexuality alone does not explain the success of clonal forms in insects with geographical parthenogenesis. , 2006, Hereditas.

[63]  M. Lynch,et al.  Transitions to Asexuality Result in Excess Amino Acid Substitutions , 2006, Science.

[64]  I. Pen,et al.  Genomic conflict in scale insects: the causes and consequences of bizarre genetic systems , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.