Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. McPherson,et al. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .
[2] D. L. Swanson,et al. Fragmentation, the Field, and the Future. , 1993 .
[3] Vincent Larivière,et al. Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine , 2016 .
[4] R. Merton. The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.
[5] D. Y. Wohn,et al. Micro Agenda Setters: The Effect of Social Media on Young Adults’ Exposure to and Attitude Toward News , 2016 .
[6] Jin X. Goh,et al. Some Evidence for a Gender Gap in Personality and Social Psychology , 2016 .
[7] Craig Calhoun,et al. Communication as a social science (and more) , 2012 .
[8] S. Baldi. Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations : A network-analytic model , 1998 .
[9] Cornelius J. König,et al. Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists , 2016, Scientometrics.
[10] M. Potthoff,et al. Die meistbeachteten Autoren und Werke der Kommunikationswissenschaft , 2013 .
[11] James Hartley,et al. Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook , 2008 .
[13] M. Rossiter. The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science , 1993 .
[14] Lana F. Rakow. Rethinking Gender Research in Communication , 1986 .
[15] Donald Owen Case,et al. How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[16] Matthias R. Hastall,et al. Zur Lage der Kommunikationswissenschaft und ihrer Fachgesellschaft. Ergebnisse der DGPuK-Mitgliederbefragung 2003 , 2003 .
[17] Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al. The Matilda Effect—Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication , 2013, Commun. Res..
[18] Rex B. Kline,et al. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .
[19] Patrick Ian Armstrong,et al. Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[20] M. Ferber,et al. CITATIONS AND NETWORKING , 1988 .
[21] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.
[22] Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al. Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[23] R. Jackson,et al. The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.
[24] Tapabrata Maiti,et al. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .
[25] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Searching for converging research using field to field citations , 2010, Scientometrics.
[26] C. Strippel,et al. Internationalisierung und Journalisierung der deutschen Kommunikationswissenschaft , 2014 .
[27] Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al. The Matilda Effect in Science Communication , 2013 .
[28] Ulla K. Bunz,et al. Publish or Perish: A Limited Author Analysis of ICA and NCA Journals , 2005 .
[29] Hildrun Kretschmer,et al. Gender bias in journals of gender studies , 2012, Scientometrics.
[30] Catherine Lutz,et al. the erasure of women's writing in sociocultural anthropology , 1990 .
[31] R. Horton,et al. Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity , 2008 .
[32] D. Swanson. Undiscovered Public Knowledge , 1986 .
[33] Laura A. Wackwitz,et al. Women in Mass Communication , 2022 .
[34] Leslie D. Dinauer,et al. Gender and Institutional Affiliation as Determinants of Publishing in Human Communication Research , 1999 .
[35] H. P. Dalen,et al. How Influential Are Demography Journals , 1999 .
[36] J. Pennebaker,et al. Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.
[37] Edd C. Applegate,et al. Scholarship Rates of Women within AEJMC Divisions, Interest Groups, and Commissions (1994–2003) , 2005 .
[38] D. Cases,et al. How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .
[39] Becky Francis,et al. An Analysis of Undergraduate Writing Styles in the Context of Gender and Achievement , 2001 .
[40] V. Larivière. Global gender disparities in science , 2013 .
[41] Stephen Cole,et al. Why sociology doesn't make progress like the natural sciences , 1994 .
[42] Michel Dupagne,et al. A Content Analysis of Women's Published Mass Communication Research, 1965–1989 , 1993 .
[43] J. Pooley. The Four Cultures: Media Studies at the Crossroads , 2016 .
[44] Katarina Prpic,et al. Gender and productivity differentials in science , 2004, Scientometrics.
[45] John G. Lynch,et al. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .
[46] Barbara F. Walter,et al. The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations , 2013, International Organization.
[47] Alan L. Porter,et al. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research , 1985, Scientometrics.
[48] Bonnie McElhinny,et al. Gender, publication and citation in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology: The construction of a scholarly canon , 2003, Language in Society.
[49] S. Mitchell,et al. Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals , 2013 .
[50] Elisabeth Davenport,et al. Who Cites women? Whom do women cite?: an Exploration of Gender and scholarly citation in Sociology , 1995, J. Documentation.
[51] Malin Håkanson,et al. The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College & Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Library Quarterly , 2005 .
[52] Giovanni Abramo,et al. Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system , 2009, Scientometrics.
[53] James Hartley,et al. Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals , 2003 .
[54] Jonathan,et al. THE PRODUCTIVITY PUZZLE : PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN PATTERNS OF PUBLICATION OF MEN AND WOMEN SCIENTISTS , 2004 .
[55] Brenda Dervin,et al. MORE THAN MISUNDERSTANDING, LESS THAN WAR: "ADMINISTRATIVE" AND "CRITICAL" THEORIES, FIELD COHESION, AND (IM)POSSIBLE DIALOGUE by , 2005 .
[56] Jörg Matthes. Framing Politics , 2012 .
[57] 魏屹东,et al. Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.
[58] Emese Domahidi,et al. Extended Abstract Internationalization and Journalization of German Communication Science? An analysis of scientific articles and citations from 50 years of Publizistik and Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft , 2014 .
[59] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.