Presence, workload and performance effects of synthetic environment design factors

There remains a limited understanding of factors in presence and its relation to performance. This research examined a range of synthetic environment (SE) design features (viewpoint, auditory cue type and visual background) suspected to influence presence, and evaluated differences in presence, workload and task performance caused by manipulations of the factors and task difficulty in a virtual-reality-based basketball free-throw task. Thirty-two research participants were also required to perform secondary-monitoring tasks to assess attention allocation to the virtual and (surrounding) real environments, as an indicator of presence. Analysis of variance results demonstrated immersiveness (viewpoint) and auditory cue type to significantly influence the sense of subjective presence and perceptions of workload. Virtual task performance was significantly affected by task difficultly. This study also provided further evidence of significant positive relations between presence and workload, but no evidence of a correlation of objective presence and performance. These results have general applicability for the design of multimodal SE-based interfaces for real-world tasks, such as telerobot control.

[1]  Mo-Yuen Chow,et al.  Control gain adaptation in virtual reality mediated human–telerobot interaction , 2005 .

[2]  Joseph Psotka,et al.  Cognitive factors associated with immersion in virtual environments , 1993 .

[3]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[4]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Presence Counter , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Human Factors Issues in Virtual Environments: A Review of the Literature , 1998, Presence.

[6]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness and attention allocation measures for quantifying telepresence experiences in teleoperation , 2004 .

[7]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Presence Equation: An Investigation into Cognitive Factors Underlying Presence , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Effects of Visual Interface Design, and Control Mode and Latency on Performance, Telepresence and Workload in a Teleoperation Task , 2000 .

[9]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Utility of Situation Awareness and Attention for Describing Telepresence Experiences in a Virtual Teleoperation Task , 2002 .

[10]  Ying Zhang,et al.  The use of visual and auditory feedback for assembly task performance in a virtual environment , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05).

[11]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Speculations on the Value of Telepresence , 1999, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Telepresence , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Robert B. Welch,et al.  How Can We Determine if the Sense of Presence Affects Task Performance? , 1999, Presence.

[14]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Measurement of presence and its consequences in virtual environments , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[16]  Mel Slater,et al.  Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess , 1996, VRST.

[17]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[18]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Virtual environments , 2002 .

[19]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[20]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  A Review of Presence and Performance in Virtual Environments , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  J.V. Draper,et al.  Workload, flow, and telepresence during teleoperation , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  M StanneyKay,et al.  Human Factors Issues in Virtual Environments , 1998 .

[23]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[24]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[25]  W Barfield,et al.  Spatial performance with perspective displays as a function of computer graphics eyepoint elevation and geometric field of view. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Roy Woodhead,et al.  Application of knowledge management in production management , 2005 .

[27]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Visual Touch in Virtual Environments: An Exploratory Study of Presence, Multimodal Interfaces, and Cross-Modal Sensory Illusions , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .