MKL for Robust Multi-modality AD Classification

We study the problem of classifying mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects from healthy individuals (controls) using multi-modal image data, to facilitate early identification of AD related pathologies. Several recent papers have demonstrated that such classification is possible with MR or PET images, using machine learning methods such as SVM and boosting. These algorithms learn the classifier using one type of image data. However, AD is not well characterized by one imaging modality alone, and analysis is typically performed using several image types--each measuring a different type of structural/functional characteristic. This paper explores the AD classification problem using multiple modalities simultaneously. The difficulty here is to assess the relevance of each modality (which cannot be assumed a priori), as well as to optimize the classifier. To tackle this problem, we utilize and adapt a recently developed idea called Multi-Kernel learning (MKL). Briefly, each imaging modality spawns one (or more kernels) and we simultaneously solve for the kernel weights and a maximum margin classifier. To make the model robust, we propose strategies to suppress the influence of a small subset of outliers on the classifier--this yields an alternative minimization based algorithm for robust MKL. We present promising multi-modal classification experiments on a large dataset of images from the ADNI project.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Spatially augmented LPboosting for AD classification with evaluations on the ADNI dataset , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  Koby Crammer,et al.  Robust Support Vector Machine Training via Convex Outlier Ablation , 2006, AAAI.

[4]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Xiaoying Wu,et al.  Structural and functional biomarkers of prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A high-dimensional pattern classification study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  C. Jack,et al.  Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD , 2000, Neurology.

[7]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: Validation studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[9]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  P. Thompson,et al.  Brain mapping as a tool to study neurodegeneration , 2007, Neurotherapeutics.

[11]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Large Scale Multiple Kernel Learning , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  N. Foster,et al.  Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer's disease , 1997, Annals of neurology.