CoupleNet: Paying Attention to Couples with Coupled Attention for Relationship Recommendation

Dating and romantic relationships not only play a huge role in our personal lives but also collectively influence and shape society. Today, many romantic partnerships originate from the Internet, signifying the importance of technology and the web in modern dating. In this paper, we present a text-based computational approach for estimating the relationship compatibility of two users on social media. Unlike many previous works that propose reciprocal recommender systems for online dating websites, we devise a distant supervision heuristic to obtain real world couples from social platforms such as Twitter. Our approach, the CoupleNet is an end-to-end deep learning based estimator that analyzes the social profiles of two users and subsequently performs a similarity match between the users. Intuitively, our approach performs both user profiling and match-making within a unified end-to-end framework. CoupleNet utilizes hierarchical recurrent neural models for learning representations of user profiles and subsequently coupled attention mechanisms to fuse information aggregated from two users. To the best of our knowledge, our approach is the first data-driven deep learning approach for our novel relationship recommendation problem. We benchmark our CoupleNet against several machine learning and deep learning baselines. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all approaches significantly in terms of precision. Qualitative analysis shows that our model is capable of also producing explainable results to users.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Gebräuchliche Fertigarzneimittel,et al.  V , 1893, Therapielexikon Neurologie.

[3]  Thomas de Quincey [C] , 2000, The Works of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. 1: Writings, 1799–1820.

[4]  장윤희,et al.  Y. , 2003, Industrial and Labor Relations Terms.

[5]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  The truth about lying in online dating profiles , 2007, CHI.

[6]  Yifan Hu,et al.  Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[7]  Meena Nagarajan,et al.  An Examination of Language Use in Online Dating Profiles , 2009, ICWSM.

[8]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles , 2010, CSCW '10.

[9]  Sihem Amer-Yahia,et al.  Relevance and ranking in online dating systems , 2010, SIGIR.

[10]  Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval , 2010 .

[11]  Judy Kay,et al.  CCR - A Content-Collaborative Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating , 2011, IJCAI.

[12]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  WTF: the who to follow service at Twitter , 2013, WWW.

[13]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation , 2014, EMNLP.

[14]  Bruno Ribeiro,et al.  Online dating recommendations: matching markets and learning preferences , 2014, WWW.

[15]  Xiongcai Cai,et al.  Evaluation and Deployment of a People-to-People Recommender in Online Dating , 2014, AAAI.

[16]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella,et al.  From "I Love You Babe" to "Leave Me Alone" - Romantic Relationship Breakups on Twitter , 2014, SocInfo.

[17]  Hua Jiang,et al.  Predicting User Replying Behavior on a Large Online Dating Site , 2014, ICWSM.

[18]  Jeffrey Pennington,et al.  GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.

[19]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Understanding the Role of Community in Online Dating , 2015, CHI.

[20]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  Reciprocal recommendation system for online dating , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[21]  Alessandro Moschitti,et al.  Learning to Rank Short Text Pairs with Convolutional Deep Neural Networks , 2015, SIGIR.

[22]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation , 2015, EMNLP.

[23]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[24]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate , 2014, ICLR.

[25]  Diyi Yang,et al.  Hierarchical Attention Networks for Document Classification , 2016, NAACL.

[26]  Mark Dredze,et al.  Learning Multiview Embeddings of Twitter Users , 2016, ACL.

[27]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[28]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  The Role of Optimal Distinctiveness and Homophily in Online Dating , 2017, ICWSM.

[29]  S. C. Hui,et al.  Translational Recommender Networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[30]  Nicholas Jing Yuan,et al.  Beyond the Words: Predicting User Personality from Heterogeneous Information , 2017, WSDM.

[31]  Tadayoshi Kohno,et al.  How Public Is My Private Life?: Privacy in Online Dating , 2017, WWW.

[32]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Learning to Rank Question Answer Pairs with Holographic Dual LSTM Architecture , 2017, SIGIR.

[33]  Jalal Mahmud,et al.  25 Tweets to Know You: A New Model to Predict Personality with Social Media , 2017, ICWSM.

[34]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Joint Deep Modeling of Users and Items Using Reviews for Recommendation , 2017, WSDM.

[35]  Tat-Seng Chua,et al.  Neural Collaborative Filtering , 2017, WWW.

[36]  Alexander Kmentt 2017 , 2018, The Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons.

[37]  S. C. Hui,et al.  Latent Relational Metric Learning via Memory-based Attention for Collaborative Ranking , 2017, WWW.

[38]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Multi-Pointer Co-Attention Networks for Recommendation , 2018, KDD.

[39]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Cross Temporal Recurrent Networks for Ranking Question Answer Pairs , 2017, AAAI.

[40]  Lina Yao,et al.  NeuRec: On Nonlinear Transformation for Personalized Ranking , 2018, IJCAI.

[41]  Lina Yao,et al.  Deep Learning Based Recommender System , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[42]  蕭瓊瑞撰述,et al.  2009 , 2019, The Winning Cars of the Indianapolis 500.

[43]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.