CD4+ T cell effectors can become memory cells with high efficiency and without further division

Whether memory T lymphocytes are derived directly from effector T cells or via a separately controlled pathway has long been debated. Here we present evidence that, after adoptive transfer, a large fraction of in vitro–derived effector CD4+ T cells have the potential to become memory T cells and that this transition can occur without further division. This data supports a linear pathway from effector to memory cells and suggests that most properties of memory cells are predetermined during effector generation. We suggest, therefore, that evaluation of vaccine efficacy in the induction of memory CD4+ T cells should focus on the effector stage.

[1]  P. Doherty,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the influenza virus-specific CD4+ T cell memory in the absence of B cells and Ig. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[2]  W. Lee,et al.  Visualizing memory phenotype development after in vitro stimulation of CD4(+) T cells. , 1998, Cellular immunology.

[3]  M. Croft,et al.  Costimulatory requirements of naive CD4+ T cells. ICAM-1 or B7-1 can costimulate naive CD4 T cell activation but both are required for optimum response. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[4]  P. Rogers,et al.  Qualitative Changes Accompany Memory T Cell Generation: Faster, More Effective Responses at Lower Doses of Antigen1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[5]  A. Cerwenka,et al.  In vivo persistence of CD8 polarized T cell subsets producing type 1 or type 2 cytokines. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[6]  Martine Tomkowiak,et al.  Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  S. Hussain,et al.  Effector CD4 T cells are biochemically distinct from the memory subset: evidence for long-term persistence of effectors in vivo. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[8]  R M Locksley,et al.  Independent and epigenetic regulation of the interleukin-4 alleles in CD4+ T cells. , 1998, Science.

[9]  L. Bradley,et al.  Characterization of antigen-specific CD4+ effector T cells in vivo: immunization results in a transient population of MEL-14-, CD45RB- helper cells that secretes interleukin 2 (IL-2), IL-3, IL-4, and interferon gamma , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  Chyung-Ru Wang,et al.  Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. , 1998, Immunity.

[11]  J. Sprent,et al.  Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. , 1998, Immunity.

[12]  L. Bradley,et al.  T cell memory. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[13]  J. Altman,et al.  Antiviral CD4 and CD8 T-cell memory: differences in the size of the response and activation requirements. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  M. Davis,et al.  Antigen-specific development of primary and memory T cells in vivo. , 1995, Science.

[15]  A. Cerwenka,et al.  Than Initial Frequencies Are Crucial Virus Infection : Homing Properties Rather Protection Against Pulmonary Influenza Naive , Effector , and Memory CD 8 T Cells in , 1999 .

[16]  L. Bradley,et al.  Withdrawal of Stimulation May Initiate the Transition of Effector to Memory CD4 Cells1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[17]  David Gray,et al.  Immunological Memory and Protective Immunity: Understanding Their Relation , 1996, Science.

[18]  S. Swain,et al.  Interleukin 2, but Not Other Common γ Chain–Binding Cytokines, Can Reverse the Defect in Generation of Cd4 Effector T Cells from Naive T Cells of Aged Mice , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  H. von Boehmer,et al.  On the cellular basis of immunological T cell memory. , 1995, Immunity.

[20]  Laurie H Glimcher,et al.  A Novel Transcription Factor, T-bet, Directs Th1 Lineage Commitment , 2000, Cell.

[21]  D. Green,et al.  Unequal Death in T Helper Cell (Th)1 and Th2 Effectors: Th1, but not Th2, Effectors Undergo Rapid Fas/FasL-mediated Apoptosis , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  Henrique Veiga-Fernandes,et al.  Response of naïve and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[23]  A. Kelso,et al.  Cutting edge: stable epigenetic inheritance of regional IFN-gamma promoter demethylation in CD44highCD8+ T lymphocytes. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[24]  J. Sprent,et al.  Immunological Memory , 1990, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology.

[25]  S. Jameson,et al.  Selective development of CD4+ T cells in transgenic mice expressing a class II MHC-restricted antigen receptor , 1989, Nature.

[26]  Joshy Jacob,et al.  Modelling T-cell memory by genetic marking of memory T cells in vivo , 1999, Nature.

[27]  D. Farber Differential TCR signaling and the generation of memory T cells. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[28]  D. Farber Cutting Edge Commentary: Differential TCR Signaling and the Generation of Memory T Cells , 1998, The Journal of Immunology.

[29]  A Radbruch,et al.  Stat6-independent GATA-3 autoactivation directs IL-4-independent Th2 development and commitment. , 2000, Immunity.

[30]  S. Swain,et al.  Helper T cell differentiation. , 1999, Current opinion in immunology.

[31]  L. E. McDonald,et al.  Distinct Methylation of the Interferon γ (IFN-γ) and Interleukin 3 (IL-3) Genes in Newly Activated Primary CD8+ T Lymphocytes: Regional IFN-γ Promoter Demethylation and mRNA Expression Are Heritable in CD44highCD8+ T Cells , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[32]  J. Sprent,et al.  The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. , 1999, Immunity.

[33]  C. Janeway,et al.  Designing and maintaining the mature TCR repertoire: the continuum of self-peptide:self-MHC complex recognition. , 1999, Immunity.

[34]  D. Pardoll,et al.  Attrition of T cell memory: selective loss of LCMV epitope-specific memory CD8 T cells following infections with heterologous viruses. , 1999, Immunity.

[35]  A. Rao,et al.  Cell-type-restricted binding of the transcription factor NFAT to a distal IL-4 enhancer in vivo. , 2000, Immunity.

[36]  S. Swain,et al.  Class II-independent generation of CD4 memory T cells from effectors. , 1999, Science.

[37]  J. Opferman,et al.  Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. , 1999, Science.

[38]  S. Swain Generation and in vivo persistence of polarized Th1 and Th2 memory cells. , 1994, Immunity.

[39]  P. Marrack,et al.  Control of homeostasis of CD8+ memory T cells by opposing cytokines. , 2000, Science.

[40]  Paul C. Rogers,et al.  From Naive to Memory T Cells , 1996, Immunological reviews.

[41]  S. Swain,et al.  Two Distinct Stages in the Transition from Naive CD4 T Cells to Effectors, Early Antigen-Dependent and Late Cytokine-Driven Expansion and Differentiation1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[42]  C. Benoist,et al.  Targeted complementation of MHC class II deficiency by intrathymic delivery of recombinant adenoviruses. , 1997, Immunity.

[43]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Instruction for Cytokine Expression in T Helper Lymphocytes in Relation to Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[44]  Suneet Agarwal,et al.  Modulation of chromatin structure regulates cytokine gene expression during T cell differentiation. , 1998, Immunity.

[45]  B. Stockinger,et al.  Following the development of a CD4 T cell response in vivo: from activation to memory formation. , 1999, Immunity.

[46]  R. Wenger,et al.  Distinct Costimulatory Molecules Are Required for the Induction of Effector and Memory Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[47]  P. Rogers,et al.  High antigen density and IL-2 are required for generation of CD4 effectors secreting Th1 rather than Th0 cytokines. , 1998, Journal of immunology.