Evaluation of MM5 Optically Thin Clouds over Europe in Fall Using ICESat Lidar Spaceborne Observations

The description of clouds in mesoscale models has progressed significantly during recent years by improving microphysical schemes with more physical parameterizations deduced from observations. Recently, the first lidar in space, the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat)/Geosciences Laser Altimeter System, has collected a valuable dataset that improves the knowledge of occurrence and macrophysical properties of clouds, and particularly high-altitude clouds, which are usually optically thin. This study evaluates the capability of the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) to reproduce optically thin clouds using the ICESat October–November 2003 dataset. Initial and boundary conditions are prescribed from NCEP products and MM5 run over the European continent with a 40-km spatial resolution. Spaceborne lidar profiles are diagnosed from model outputs and compared with the observed ones at the same location and time. One month of simulations–observations comparisons shows that the model correctly reproduces cloud structures on average, but underestimates the thinnest clouds (by 0%–20%) and overestimates less thin clouds in the upper troposphere (altitude 6 km). The total low-level water cloud amount (altitude 6 km) appears fairly well reproduced, although the masking effect of higher clouds does not allow for a firm conclusion. The clouds are rarely simulated and observed simultaneously, 50% for high clouds and 20% for low clouds. The lack of high-altitude very thin clouds is possibly due to dry biases in the upper-troposphere humidity fields used to force the model. The overestimation of optically less thin cloud may be due to an overestimation of the cloud lifetime or water vapor supersaturation around ice clouds that is not taken into account in the model. When the upper troposphere and low warm clouds appear in the model at the same time and location as in the observations, they are optically too thick, likely because their water/ice content and particle concentration are overestimated simultaneously.

[1]  C. Platt,et al.  Lidar and Radiometric Observations of Cirrus Clouds , 1973 .

[2]  N. L. Abshire,et al.  Some Microphysical Properties of an Ice Cloud from Lidar Observation of Horizontally Oriented Crystals , 1978 .

[3]  C. Bohren,et al.  An introduction to atmospheric radiation , 1981 .

[4]  Andrew J. Heymsfield,et al.  A parameterization of the particle size spectrum of ice clouds in terms of the ambient temperature and the ice water content , 1984 .

[5]  K. Liou.  Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global Perspective , 1986 .

[6]  I. Troen,et al.  A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation , 1986 .

[7]  K. Liou,et al.  Solar Radiative Transfer in Cirrus Clouds. Part I: Single-Scattering and Optical Properties of Hexagonal Ice Crystals , 1989 .

[8]  J. Dudhia.  Numerical Study of Convection Observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment Using a Mesoscale Two-Dimensional Model , 1989 .

[9]  Paul W. Stackhouse,et al.  The Relevance of the Microphysical and Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds to Climate and Climatic Feedback , 1990 .

[10]  Andrew J. Heymsfield,et al.  A scheme for parameterizing ice cloud water content in general circulation models , 1990 .

[11]  K. Sassen.  The Polarization Lidar Technique for Cloud Research: A Review and Current Assessment , 1991 .

[12]  H. Kapitza,et al.  3D mesoscale numerical studies of cirrus and stratus clouds by their time and space evolution , 1992 .

[13]  G. Grell.  Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations , 1993 .

[14]  P. Rasch,et al.  Description of the NCAR community climate model (CCM2), June 1993. Technical note , 1993 .

[15]  J. Dudhia.  A Nonhydrostatic Version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation Tests and Simulation of an Atlantic Cyclone and Cold Front , 1993 .

[16]  Scot T. Heckman,et al.  Mesoscale Numerical Simulation of Cirrus Clouds—FIRE Case Study and Sensitivity Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  Annick Bricaud,et al.  The POLDER mission: instrument characteristics and scientific objectives , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Understanding Satellite Cirrus Cloud Climatologies with Calibrated Lidar Optical Depths , 1995 .

[19]  H. Treut,et al.  Precipitation and radiation modeling in a general circulation model: Introduction of cloud microphysical processes , 1995 .

[20]  A. Beljaars.  The parametrization of surface fluxes in large-scale models under free convection , 1995 .

[21]  Comparison of Simulated Cloud Cover with Satellite Observations over the Western United States. , 1995 .

[22]  A. Macke,et al.  Single Scattering Properties of Atmospheric Ice Crystals , 1996 .

[23]  Anthony D. Del Genio,et al.  A Prognostic Cloud Water Parameterization for Global Climate Models , 1996 .

[24]  D. Randall,et al.  On Fire at Ten , 1996 .

[25]  Donald P. Wylie,et al.  Comparison of the Climatologies of High-Level Clouds from HIRS and ISCCP , 1996 .

[26]  Greg Michael McFarquhar,et al.  Microphysical Characteristics of Three Anvils Sampled during the Central Equatorial Pacific Experiment , 1996 .

[27]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Airborne Scanning Spectrometer for Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, Water Vapor, and Surface Properties , 1996 .

[28]  L R Bissonnette,et al.  Lidar effective multiple-scattering coefficients in cirrus clouds. , 1997, Applied optics.

[29]  H. Isaka,et al.  Cloud-Radiation Studies During the European Cloud and Radiation Experiment (EUCREX) , 1998 .

[30]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Parameterizations of reflectance and effective emittance for satellite remote sensing of cloud properties , 1998 .

[31]  Gerald G. Mace,et al.  Validation of hydrometeor occurrence predicted by the ECMWF Model using millimeter wave radar data , 1998 .

[32]  R. Rasmussen,et al.  Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model , 1998 .

[33]  L. Kornblueh,et al.  3-D simulation of clouds with subgrid fluctuations of temperature and humidity , 1998 .

[34]  K. Liou,et al.  Single-scattering properties of complex ice crystals in terrestrial atmosphere , 1998 .

[35]  Richard C. Miake-Lye,et al.  Subsonic aircraft: Contrail and cloud effects special study (SUCCESS) , 1998 .

[36]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[37]  Comparison of SAGE‐II and HIRS co‐located cloud height measurements , 1999 .

[38]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  A validation survey of the ECMWF prognostic cloud scheme using LITE , 1999 .

[39]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Impact of cirrus cloud ice crystal shape and size on multiple scattering effects: Application to spaceborne and airborne backscatter lidar measurements during LITE Mission and E LITE Campaign , 1999 .

[40]  Maurice Herman,et al.  Cloud thermodynamical phase classification from the POLDER spaceborne instrument , 2000 .

[41]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 1. Data and models , 2000 .

[42]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase , 2000 .

[43]  U. Schumann,et al.  Ice‐supersaturated regions and subvisible cirrus in the northern midlatitude upper troposphere , 2000 .

[44]  Graeme L. Stephens,et al.  CloudSat instrument requirements as determined from ECMWF forecasts of global cloudiness , 2001 .

[45]  Pierre H. Flamant,et al.  Ice crystal shapes in cirrus clouds derived from POLDER/ADEOS‐1 , 2001 .

[46]  Luc R. Bissonnette,et al.  Range–Height Scans of Lidar Depolarization for Characterizing Properties and Phase of Clouds and Precipitation , 2001 .

[47]  Fei Chen,et al.  IMPROVEMENTS TO SURFACE FLUX COMPUTATIONS IN THE MRF PBL SCHEME, AND REFINEMENTS TO URBAN PROCESSES IN THE NOAH LAND-SURFACE MODEL WITH THE NCAR/ATEC REAL-TIME FDDA AND FORECAST SYSTEM , 2001 .

[48]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  A Midlatitude Cirrus Cloud Climatology from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing. Part II: Microphysical Properties Derived from Lidar Depolarization , 2001 .

[49]  U. Schumann,et al.  Water vapour measurements inside cirrus clouds in Northern and Southern hemispheres during INCA , 2002 .

[50]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[51]  Gerald M. Stokes,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program , 2003 .

[52]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[53]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Evaluating Mesoscale Model Predictions of Clouds and Radiation with SGP ARM Data over a Seasonal Timescale , 2003 .

[54]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapor from MODIS , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[55]  Dean Lauritsen,et al.  Performance of operational radiosonde humidity sensors in direct comparison with a chilled mirror dew‐point hygrometer and its climate implication , 2003 .

[56]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Estimate of the global distribution of stratiform supercooled liquid water clouds using the LITE lidar , 2004 .

[57]  Owen B. Toon,et al.  Mission investigates tropical cirrus clouds , 2004 .

[58]  J. Spinhirne,et al.  Aerosol and cloud optical depth from GLAS: Results and verification for an October 2003 California fire smoke case , 2005 .

[59]  J. Spinhirne,et al.  Cloud and aerosol measurements from GLAS: Overview and initial results , 2005 .

[60]  J. Monico,et al.  Analysis of Relative Humidity Sensors at the WMO Radiosonde Intercomparison Experiment in Brazil , 2005 .

[61]  James D. Spinhirne,et al.  Height distribution between cloud and aerosol layers from the GLAS spaceborne lidar in the Indian Ocean region , 2005 .

[62]  Y. Tsushima,et al.  Climate response to volcanic forcing: Validation of climate sensitivity of a coupled atmosphere‐ocean general circulation model , 2005 .

[63]  S. Bony,et al.  SIRTA, a ground-based atmospheric observatory for cloud and aerosol research , 2005 .

[64]  A. Benedetti,et al.  Validation of ECMWF global forecast model parameters using GLAS atmospheric channel measurements , 2005 .

[65]  H. Chepfer,et al.  The Ability of MM5 to Simulate Ice Clouds: Systematic Comparison between Simulated and Measured Fluxes and Lidar/Radar Profiles at the SIRTA Atmospheric Observatory , 2006 .

[66]  Martial Haeffelin,et al.  Classification of Ice Crystal Shapes in Midlatitude Ice Clouds from Three Years of Lidar Observations over the SIRTA Observatory , 2006 .