Revised look at the effects of the channel model on molecular communication systems

Molecular communications, where information is passed between the Transmitter (TX) and the Receiver (RX) via molecules is a promising area with vast potential applications. However, the infancy of the topic within the overall taxonomy of communications has meant that to date, several channel models are in press, each of which is applied under various constraints and/or assumptions. Amongst them is that the arrival of molecules in different time slots can be, or is, considered as independent events. In practice, this assumption is not accurate, as the molecules arriving in the previous slot reduce the possible number of molecules in the next slot and hence make them correlated. In this letter, we analyze a more realistic performance of a molecular communication assuming correlated events. The key result shown, is that the widely used model assuming independent events significantly overestimates the error rates in the channel. This result is thus critical to researchers who focus on energy use at the nano-scale, as the new analysis provides a more realistic prediction and therefore, less energy will be needed to attain a desired error rate, increasing system feasibility.

[1]  Yi Lu,et al.  Comparison of Channel Coding Schemes for Molecular Communications Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[2]  R. V. Mises,et al.  Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics , 1966 .

[3]  Huseyin Birkan Yilmaz,et al.  Arrival modelling for molecular communication via diffusion , 2014 .

[4]  Adnan Aijaz,et al.  Error Performance of Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Using Pulse-Based Modulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[5]  Chan-Byoung Chae,et al.  Novel modulation techniques using isomers as messenger molecules for molecular communication via diffusion , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  Symbol Interval Optimization for Molecular Communication With Drift , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[7]  Oliver C. Ibe,et al.  Fundamentals of Applied Probability and Random Processes , 2005 .

[8]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Energy model for communication via diffusion in nanonetworks , 2010, Nano Commun. Networks.

[9]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  A tunnel-based approach for signal shaping in molecular communication , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[10]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Interference effects on modulation techniques in diffusion based nanonetworks , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[11]  Matthew D. Higgins,et al.  Error correction coding for molecular communications , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[12]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[13]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Effect of Degradation in Molecular Communication: Impairment or Enhancement? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[14]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Characterization of intersymbol interference in concentration-encoded unicast molecular communication , 2011, 2011 24th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering(CCECE).

[15]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Reception enhancement with protrusions in communication via diffusion , 2013, 2013 First International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom).

[16]  Satya N Majumdar,et al.  Capture of particles undergoing discrete random walks. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.