Excavating the role of NPEs in the innovation process: Did we start a mission possible?

The past decades have seen the rise of so-called Non-Producing/Practicing Entities (NPEs). NPEs do not use patents for appropriating own R&D investments necessary for developing technologies embedded in own products or services but solely focus on exploiting, enforcing or monetising patents. One might suspect that this behaviour impacts the innovation processes of firms and technological developments in different industrial sectors. Interviews with a panel of experts from a European country reveal most notably that the emergence of NPEs has changed the awareness of firms' man-agement towards patents and the way of managing them. The results also indicate that the contemporary situation is still diffuse and immature, so that their full impact is difficult to understand, even from an interpretivists' perspective. (120 w).

[1]  J. Landeta.  Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences , 2006 .

[2]  F. Tietze.  Technology Market Transactions - Auctions, Intermediaries and Innovation , 2012 .

[3]  Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Patent Litigation in the Semiconductor Industry , 2007 .

[4]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Technology market intermediaries and innovation , 2010 .

[5]  David Pollard,et al.  Innovation and Technology Transfer Intermediaries: A Systemic International Study , 2006 .

[6]  S. Dunphy,et al.  The innovation funnel , 1996 .

[7]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[8]  George Allan,et al.  A critique of using grounded theory as a research method , 2003 .

[9]  Jorge Lemus,et al.  Patent Assertion and the Rate of Innovation , 2014 .

[10]  Erika Douglas,et al.  Mind the Gap: Economic Costs and Innovation Perils in the Space between Patent and Competition Law , 2012 .

[11]  M. Reitzig,et al.  Private-Collective Innovation, Competition, and Firms’ Counterintuitive Appropriation Strategies , 2011 .

[12]  A. Mayergoyz.  Lessons from Europe on How to Tame U.S. Patent Trolls , 2009 .

[13]  James Bessen,et al.  The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls , 2011 .

[14]  Joe Tidd,et al.  Development of Novel Products Through Intraorganizational and Interorganizational Networks , 1995 .

[15]  Meghan Cope,et al.  Grounded Visualization: Integrating the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Data through Grounded Theory and Visualization , 2006 .

[16]  Matthias Kramer,et al.  Patent-based investment funds as innovation intermediaries for SMEs: In-depth analysis of reciprocal interactions, motives and fallacies , 2012 .

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[18]  M. Reitzig,et al.  Collateral damage for R&D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology , 2010 .

[19]  R. Ghafele,et al.  Promoting Intellectual Property Monetization in Developing Countries: A Review of Issues and Strategies to Support Knowledge-Driven Growth , 2012 .

[20]  R. Merges.  The Trouble with Trolls: Innovation, Rent-Seeking, and Patent Law Reform , 2010 .

[21]  Oliver Schilke,et al.  What Drives Key Informant Accuracy? , 2012 .

[22]  Shane M. Greenstein,et al.  Markets for Technology , 2002, IEEE Micro.

[23]  P. Mullen.  Delphi: myths and reality. , 2003, Journal of health organization and management.

[24]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[25]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[26]  B. Kahin.  Patents and Diversity in Innovation , 2007 .

[27]  M. Benassi,et al.  Playing in between: Patent Brokers in Markets for Technology , 2009 .

[28]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[29]  Justus Baron,et al.  Essential patents and standard dynamics , 2011, 2011 7th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT).

[30]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Are Universities Patent Trolls? , 2007 .

[31]  Gerard N. Magliocca.  Blackberries and Barnyards: Patent Trolls and the Perils of Innovation , 2007 .

[32]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  Patent Trolls and Technology Diffusion , 2013 .

[33]  J. Henkel,et al.  Patent Trolls on Markets for Technology - An Empirical Analysis of Trolls' Patent Acquisitions , 2010 .

[34]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  How to measure patent thickets—A novel approach , 2011 .

[35]  Joe Tidd,et al.  Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks the case of home automation , 1995 .

[36]  Anne Layne-Farrar,et al.  Revisiting Injunctive Relief: Interpreting eBay in High-Tech Industries with Non-Practicing Patent Holders , 2007 .

[37]  Jeremiah S. Helm.  Why Pharmaceutical Firms Support Patent Trolls: The Disparate Impact of Ebay v. Mercexchange on Innovation , 2006 .

[38]  Greg A. Stevens,et al.  3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success! , 1997 .

[39]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[40]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[41]  A. Blackwell,et al.  Graphic elicitation: using research diagrams as interview stimuli , 2006 .

[42]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most Litigated Patents , 2009 .

[43]  M. Foucault,et al.  L'archéologie du savoir , 1970 .

[44]  J. Henkel,et al.  Patent trolls on markets for technology – An empirical analysis of NPEs’ patent acquisitions , 2012 .

[45]  Rob Dekkers,et al.  Distributed Manufacturing as co-evolutionary system , 2009 .

[46]  Ashby H. B. Monk.  The Emerging Market for Intellectual Property: Drivers, Restrainers, and Implications , 2008 .

[47]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[48]  B. Green,et al.  Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. , 2006, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[49]  P. Cronin,et al.  Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. , 2008, British journal of nursing.

[50]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  On Sharks, Trolls, and Other Patent Animals - 'Being Infringed' as a Normatively Induced Innovation Exploitation Strategy , 2006 .

[51]  J. B. Harvey.  The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement , 1974 .

[52]  Frank Tietze.  Technology Market Transactions , 2012 .

[53]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis , 2008 .

[54]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .