Comparison of Contralateral Breast Dose for Various Tangential Field Techniques in Clinical Radiotherapy

Contralateral breast (CLB) cancer is a rare but serious concern in radiotherapy. In this study, the CLB dose was measured using MOSFET dosimeter in 49 patients who underwent breast conservation surgery treated by different radiotherapy tangential field techniques, which included enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW), physical wedge, and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The mean percent of the prescribed dose received by the contralateral areola in treatment technique using physical wedge (Cobalt), physical wedge (Linac), EDW, and IMRT were 4.27% (SD: 0.65), 3.61% (SD: 0.60), 3.38% (SD: 0.58), and 1.65% (SD: 0.24), respectively. There was a 29% CLB dose reduction at 3 cm from the medial tangential field border with IMRT compared to other wedged tangential field techniques. The study shows that the CLB dose could be reduced with IMRT or reducing or avoiding the medial wedge in conventional tangential field planning for breast cancer.

[1]  F. Krasin,et al.  Comparison of contralateral breast doses from 1/2 beam block and isocentric treatment techniques for patients treated with primary breast irradiation with 60CO. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M. Stasi,et al.  [Factors affecting the contralateral dose for the non-treated breast in irradiation following quadrantectomy]. , 1997, La Radiologia medica.

[3]  P. Roberson,et al.  Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  E. Mok,et al.  Evaluating the dose to the contralateral breast when using a dynamic wedge versus a regular wedge. , 1995, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[5]  S. Kalnicki,et al.  Intensity‐Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Reduces the Dose to the Contralateral Breast When Compared to Conventional Tangential Fields for Primary Breast Irradiation: Initial Report , 2004, Cancer journal.

[6]  D. Gaffney,et al.  Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge. , 1997, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  B. McParland.  The effect of a dynamic wedge in the medial tangential field upon the contralateral breast dose. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Cancer in the contralateral breast after radiotherapy for breast cancer. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  X. Y. Wang,et al.  Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  R. J. Lee,et al.  Comparison of the homogeneity of breast dose distributions with and without the medial wedge. , 1998, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.