Bio-inspired model for robust motion detection under noisy conditions

The neuronal pathway for biological motion vision is complex and non-linear. Despite considerable research effort it has defied accurate modelling for over 50 years. Recently we proposed a computational model for the calculation of egomotion that explained a number of outstanding issues, such as reliable coding in different environments and responses to artificially contrast rescaled images. Here we varied the amount of noise to determine the robustness of the model under conditions more typical of real-world scenes. High-dynamic range panoramic images taken from various environments were used as inputs to a computational motion model of biological motion vision. Gaussian white noise was added after image pre-processing but before motion detection. The addition of noise around the levels observed experimentally, in both biology and an engineered camera system, resulted in a surprising 50% increase in the discriminability of different velocity levels over that seen in the noise free condition. The more commonly used gradient model for motion detection produced outputs so swamped by noise they were unreliable under the same conditions. While the phenomenon of stochastic resonance has been observed previously in biological and bio-inspired systems it is most commonly found in conjunction with non-linear thresholding operations, such as spike generation. These findings are unusual as they show noise being beneficial in a model of an analogue system. They also highlight the robustness of the correlation model for biological motion detection to very large levels of noise.

[1]  R eid R. H arrison.  A Biologically Inspired Analog IC for Visual Collision Detection , .

[2]  Sergey M. Bezrukov,et al.  Stochastic resonance in non-dynamical systems without response thresholds , 1997, Nature.

[3]  D. Stavenga.  Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. I. Integrated facet lens and rhabdomere optics , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Analysis of Visual Motion by Biological and Computer Systems , 1981, Computer.

[5]  Sumetee kesorn.  Visual Navigation for Mobile Robots: a Survey , 2012 .

[6]  A. Verri,et al.  A computational approach to motion perception , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  S. Laughlin,et al.  The rate of information transfer at graded-potential synapses , 1996, Nature.

[8]  W. Bialek,et al.  Statistical mechanics and visual signal processing , 1994, cond-mat/9401072.

[9]  R.S.A. Brinkworth,et al.  Biomimetic Motion Detection , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information.

[10]  K. Kirschfeld,et al.  Motion sensitivity in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Limb,et al.  Estimating the Velocity of Moving Images in Television Signals , 1975 .

[12]  Derek Abbott,et al.  What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  P. Anandan,et al.  A computational framework and an algorithm for the measurement of visual motion , 1987, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[17]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Effect of spatial sampling on pattern noise in insect-based motion detection , 2005, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[18]  Matthew Garratt,et al.  An overview of insect-inspired guidance for application in ground and airborne platforms , 2004 .

[19]  Patrick Bouthemy,et al.  Computation and analysis of image motion: A synopsis of current problems and methods , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Martina Medkovatt,et al.  Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio , 2004 .

[21]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[22]  A. Borst,et al.  Transient and steady-state response properties of movement detectors. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  B. Hassenstein,et al.  Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus , 1956 .

[24]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Robust Analog VLSI Reichardt Motion Sensor , 2000 .

[25]  M. Srinivasan.  Generalized gradient schemes for the measurement of two-dimensional image motion , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Dendritic integration of motion information in visual interneurons of the blowfly , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  C. W. G Clifford,et al.  Fundamental mechanisms of visual motion detection: models, cells and functions , 2002, Progress in Neurobiology.

[28]  K. Hausen.  Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  N. Franceschini,et al.  A 3D insect-inspired visual autopilot for corridor-following , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[30]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Performance of optical flow techniques , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Information theoretical evaluation of parametric models of gain control in blowfly photoreceptor cells , 2001, Vision Research.

[32]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[33]  R. O. Uusitalo,et al.  Transfer of graded potentials at the photoreceptor-interneuron synapse , 1995, The Journal of general physiology.

[34]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Correlation versus gradient type motion detectors: the pros and cons , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  A survey on visual surveillance of object motion and behaviors , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[36]  Lei Shi,et al.  Propagation of photon noise and information transfer in visual motion detection , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[37]  David C. O'Carroll,et al.  Robust Models for Optic Flow Coding in Natural Scenes Inspired by Insect Biology , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Frank Moss,et al.  STOCHASTIC RESONANCE: TUTORIAL AND UPDATE , 1994 .

[39]  V. Hateren,et al.  Processing of natural time series of intensities by the visual system of the blowfly , 1997, Vision Research.

[40]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Gross motion planning—a survey , 1992, CSUR.

[41]  A. Straw,et al.  A `bright zone' in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  D. G. Stavenga,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: Dependence on waveguide effects and pigment concentration , 1986, Vision Research.

[43]  David C. O'Carroll,et al.  A neuromorphic model for a robust, adaptive photoreceptor reduces variability in correlation based motion detectors , 2006 .

[44]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Some Quantitative Aspects of the Fly’s Brain , 1976 .

[45]  M. F. Land,et al.  Maps of the acute zones of fly eyes , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.