Relationships Between Blogs as EWOM and Interactivity, Perceived Interactivity, and Parasocial Interaction

Abstract The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of a political candidate’s blog-a form of eWOM (electronic Word-of-Mouth)-on attitudes toward the website, attitudes toward the political candidate, and intentions to vote. The results showed that interactivity in the form of a blog significantly influenced attitude toward the website, but not attitudes toward the candidate or voting intention. However, perceived interactivity influenced all three dependent variables, but did not interact with interactivity, suggesting that these are two separate constructs. The effects were mediated by parasocial interaction.

[1]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[2]  Michael Cornfield Politics Moves Online: Campaigning and the Internet , 2004 .

[3]  John B. Horrigan and R. Kelly Garrett and Paul Resnick,et al.  The internet and democratic debate , 2004 .

[4]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Effects Of Structural And Perceptual Factors On Attitudes Toward The Website , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[5]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Wendy Macias,et al.  A Beginning Look at the Effects of Interactivity, Product Involvement and Web Experience on Comprehension: Brand Web Sites as Interactive Advertising , 2003 .

[7]  SHYAM SUNDAR,et al.  Explicating Web Site Interactivity , 2003, Commun. Res..

[8]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity , 2002 .

[9]  Wei-Na Lee,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Interactivity , 2002 .

[10]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[11]  A. Rubin The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. , 2002 .

[12]  Sally J. McMillan Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[13]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[14]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information , 2001 .

[15]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  Impact of Motivation, Attraction, and Parasocial Interaction on Talk Radio listening , 2000 .

[16]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .

[17]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[19]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[20]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Nightly@nbc.com: Audience Scope and the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. , 1995 .

[21]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[22]  Everette E. Dennis,et al.  Freedom of Expression, the University, and the Media , 1992 .

[23]  Philip J. Auter Psychometric: TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale , 1992 .

[24]  J. Beniger Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo-Community , 1987 .

[25]  R. Rubin,et al.  Development of parasocial interaction relationships , 1987 .

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[28]  R. Brooks,et al.  “Word-of-Mouth” Advertising in Selling New Products , 1957 .