Shifts in sensory dominance between various stages of user-product interactions.

In the area of product design, sensory dominance can be defined as the relative importance of different sensory modalities for product experience. It is often assumed that vision dominates the other senses. In the present study, we asked 243 participants to describe their experiences with consumer products in various situations: while buying a product, after the first week, the first month, and the first year of usage. The data suggest that the dominant sensory modality depends on the period of product usage. At the moment of buying, vision is the most important modality, but during the usage the other sensory modalities gain importance. The roles of the different modalities during usage are product-dependent. Averaged over 93 products analyzed in this study, after one month of usage touch becomes more important than vision, and after one year vision, touch and audition appear to be equally important. We conclude that to create a long-lasting positive product experience, designers need to consider user-product interaction at different stages of product usage and to determine which sensory modality dominates product experience at each stage.

[1]  R. H. Day,et al.  Visual capture of haptically judged depth , 1969 .

[2]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction , 1969 .

[3]  R. Klein,et al.  Effects of arousal on human visual dominance , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Pieter Koele,et al.  A Comparison of Different Methods for the Elicitation of Attribute Weights: Structural Modeling, Process Tracing, and Self-Reports , 1995 .

[5]  Tracy B. Henley,et al.  Cognitive and affective components of stimuli presented in three modes , 1993 .

[6]  M. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Two varieties of perceived length , 1970 .

[7]  E. A. Miller Interaction of vision and touch in conflict and nonconflict form perception tasks. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  H. Schifferstein The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[9]  B. Wansink,et al.  The Validity of Attribute-Importance Measurement: A Review , 2007 .

[10]  T. Keinonen,et al.  Three-in-One User. Study for Focused Collaboration , 2008 .

[11]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[12]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[13]  P. Bertelson Chapter 14 Ventriloquism: A case of crossmodal perceptual grouping , 1999 .

[14]  Rachel S. Herz,et al.  An Examination of Objective and Subjective Measures of Experience Associated to Odors, Music, and Paintings , 1998 .

[15]  R. D. Easton,et al.  A quantitative confirmation of visual capture of curvature. , 1978, The Journal of general psychology.

[16]  Evangelos Karapanos,et al.  User experience over time , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  D. Brinberg,et al.  Assessing attribute importance: a comparison of six methods , 1986 .

[18]  H. Pick,et al.  Visual capture produced by prism spectacles , 1965 .

[19]  Glenn Gamst,et al.  Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation , 2005 .

[20]  G. Stratton Vision without inversion of the retinal image. , 1897 .

[21]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129) , 1999 .

[22]  S. Lederman,et al.  Perception of texture by vision and touch: multidimensionality and intersensory integration. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  What makes products fresh: The smell or the colour? , 2009 .

[25]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and design implications , 2008 .

[26]  P. Desmet,et al.  The effects of sensory impairments on product experience and personal well-being , 2007, Ergonomics.

[27]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[28]  Sanford Labovitz,et al.  The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories , 1970 .