Antecedents and Consequences of Customers’ Engagement with Pro-Environmental Consumption-Related Content on Social Media

Social media has been widely used to design and publish pro-environment campaigns; the goal is to spread awareness about environmental issues and explain how customers can change their consumption behavior to protect the environment. Customers’ engagement with pro-environmental campaigns (CEPC) on social media is crucial to achieving these objectives. Limited studies have examined the factors that could increase CEPC, and its effects, on pro-environmental consumption behavior. The available literature suggests the antecedents of social media engagement, but is restricted to brands/products. Based on these findings, this study explores the effects of advertising attractiveness, advertising-based skepticism, online interaction propensity, and privacy concerns on CEPC. This study also suggests that customers’ engagement with pro-environmental consumption-related content can be defined as a pro-environmental experience that could lead to pro-environmental consumption. The study was based on a sample of 262 responses from online users; the results indicated that CEPC is largely affected by advertising attractiveness, advertising skepticism, and online interaction propensity. The study further established that pro-environment consumption is a potential outcome of CPEC. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing insight into ways in which activist groups can inspire consumers to engage with pro-environment content and exploring whether that engagement translates into a pro-environment intention.

[1]  Abdallah Alsaad,et al.  A sensemaking perspective on the association between social media engagement and pro-environment behavioural intention , 2023, Technology in Society.

[2]  Yu-Hui Fang,et al.  Go Green, Go Social: Exploring the Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behaviors in Social Networking Sites beyond Norm Activation Theory , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  Kevan W. Lamm,et al.  Examining the impact of media use during the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental engagement , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[4]  Shailender Singh,et al.  Pro-environmental purchase intention towards eco-friendly apparel: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior with perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concern , 2022, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing.

[5]  Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani,et al.  The role of brand interactivity and involvement in driving social media consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty: the mediating effect of brand trust , 2021, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

[6]  Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch,et al.  Green Advertising on Social Media: Brand Authenticity Mediates the Effect of Different Appeals on Purchase Intent and Digital Engagement , 2021, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising.

[7]  Abaid Ullah Zafar,et al.  Social media and sustainable purchasing attitude: Role of trust in social media and environmental effectiveness , 2021, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[8]  Chunli Ji,et al.  How social media advertising features influence consumption and sharing intentions: the mediation of customer engagement , 2021, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

[9]  Abdallah Alsaad,et al.  The interaction among religiosity, moral intensity and moral certainty in predicting ethical consumption: A study of Muslim consumers , 2021 .

[10]  Danielle Ka Lai Lee,et al.  Who endorses conspiracy theories? A moderated mediation model of Chinese and international social media use, media skepticism, need for cognition, and COVID-19 conspiracy theory endorsement in China , 2021, Computers in Human Behavior.

[11]  U. Ghani,et al.  The Use of Social Networking Sites and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: A Mediation and Moderation Model , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  Eunju Ko,et al.  Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[13]  Kim‐Pong Tam Gratitude to Nature: Presenting a Theory of its Conceptualization, Measurement, and Effects on Pro-Environmental Behavior , 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[14]  Abdallah Alsaad Ethical judgment, subjective norms, and ethical consumption: The moderating role of moral certainty , 2020 .

[15]  Abdallah Alsaad,et al.  Religiosity, idealism, and ethical consumption: the mediating effect of perceived customer effectiveness and moral obligation , 2020 .

[16]  Zhong Yao,et al.  Moral obligation in online social interaction: Clicking the "like" button , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Ruixia Han,et al.  The Influence of Norm Perception on Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Comparison between the Moderating Roles of Traditional Media and Social Media , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  Daniela Langaro,et al.  Social media brand engagement in the context of collaborative consumption: the case of AIRBNB , 2020, Journal of Brand Management.

[19]  Abdallah Alsaad,et al.  The Determinants of Digital Payment Systems’ Acceptance under Cultural Orientation Differences: The Case of Uncertainty Avoidance , 2020 .

[20]  C. Flavián,et al.  Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership , 2020 .

[21]  Biao Luo,et al.  How does green advertising skepticism on social media affect consumer intention to purchase green products? , 2020 .

[22]  M. Sotiriadis,et al.  Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior , 2020, Sustainability.

[23]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase green products in the social media marketing context , 2019 .

[24]  T. Ramayah,et al.  The role of social media on recycling behaviour , 2019, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[25]  Bruno Schivinski Eliciting brand-related social media engagement: A conditional inference tree framework , 2019 .

[26]  Rajesh Sharma,et al.  The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[27]  Wenyu Zhang,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Effects of Cognitive Factors across Different Kinds of Green Products , 2019, Sustainability.

[28]  A. Mishra Antecedents of consumers’ engagement with brand-related content on social media , 2019, Marketing Intelligence & Planning.

[29]  Manoochehr Najmi,et al.  Consumers' engagement with social media activation campaigns: Construct conceptualization and scale development , 2019, Psychology & Marketing.

[30]  Dayuan Li,et al.  The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: The mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[31]  A. Chong,et al.  Evaluating user-generated content in social media: an effective approach to encourage greater pro-environmental behavior in tourism? , 2018 .

[32]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Health information privacy concerns, antecedents, and information disclosure intention in online health communities , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[33]  D. Maynard,et al.  Pro-Environmental Campaigns via Social Media: Analysing Awareness and Behaviour Patterns , 2017 .

[34]  Li-Wei Wu,et al.  Quality dimensions in online communities influence purchase intentions , 2017 .

[35]  Veronica Liljander,et al.  Do Ethical Social Media Communities Pay Off? An Exploratory Study of the Ability of Facebook Ethical Communities to Strengthen Consumers’ Ethical Consumption Behavior , 2017 .

[36]  Constantinos N. Leonidou,et al.  Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism , 2017 .

[37]  Tun-Chih Kou,et al.  Toward Sustainable Livelihoods: Investigating the Drivers of Purchase Behavior for Green Products , 2017 .

[38]  Laurence Dessart Social media engagement: a model of antecedents and relational outcomes , 2017 .

[39]  Bruno Godey,et al.  Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior , 2016 .

[40]  James W. Peltier,et al.  Social media and consumer engagement: a review and research agenda , 2016 .

[41]  Juliette Wilson,et al.  I do it, but don't tell anyone! Personal values, personal and social norms: Can social media play a role in changing pro-environmental behaviours? , 2016 .

[42]  Steve Goodman,et al.  Social media engagement behaviour: a uses and gratifications perspective , 2016 .

[43]  Hui-ping Huang Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior , 2016 .

[44]  I. Hong,et al.  Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[45]  R. Brodie,et al.  Strategic drivers, anticipated and unanticipated outcomes of customer engagement , 2016 .

[46]  Jayesh D. Patel,et al.  Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action , 2016 .

[47]  George Christodoulides,et al.  Measuring Consumers' Engagement With Brand-Related Social-Media Content , 2016, Journal of Advertising Research.

[48]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[49]  G. Ziggers,et al.  The reinforcing effect of a firm's customer orientation and supply-base orientation on performance , 2016 .

[50]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[51]  C. Veloutsou,et al.  Consumer engagement in online brand communities: a social media perspective , 2015 .

[52]  Seounmi Youn,et al.  Functional matching effect in CRM: Moderating roles of perceived message quality and skepticism , 2014 .

[53]  Caroline Wiertz,et al.  GOSIP in Cyberspace: Conceptualization and Scale Development for General Online Social Interaction Propensity , 2014 .

[54]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[55]  George R. Milne,et al.  Spreading the word through likes on Facebook: Evaluating the message strategy effectiveness of Fortune 500 companies , 2013 .

[56]  W. Elving Scepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: the influence of fit and reputation , 2013 .

[57]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Song Su,et al.  Attitude Toward the Viral Ad: Expanding Traditional Advertising Models to Interactive Advertising , 2013 .

[59]  Khim-Yong Goh,et al.  Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Edwina Luck,et al.  Online environmental citizenship : blogs, green marketing and consumer sentiment in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[61]  Yi-Cheng Ku,et al.  Gratifications for using CMC technologies: A comparison among SNS, IM, and e-mail , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  A. D. do Paço,et al.  Factors Affecting Skepticism toward Green Advertising , 2012 .

[63]  Kristian Anders Hvass,et al.  The takeoff of social media in tourism , 2012 .

[64]  Vasile Dinu Consumers’ Education and Information from the Perspective of Their Awareness and Ecological Behaviour , 2012 .

[65]  L. Hollebeek Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus , 2011 .

[66]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[67]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks? , 2011, Journal of Advertising Research.

[68]  D. Muntinga,et al.  Introducing COBRAs , 2011 .

[69]  E. Malthouse,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness , 2009 .

[70]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .

[71]  J. Bowden The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework , 2009 .

[72]  Jon Froehlich,et al.  Promoting Energy Efficient Behaviors in the Home through Feedback : The Role of Human-Computer Interaction , 2009 .

[73]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Beyond the Call of Duty: Why Customers Contribute to Firm-hosted Commercial Online Communities , 2007 .

[74]  Ann E. Schlosser Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context , 2005 .

[75]  Michel Laroche,et al.  Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro‐environmental behaviors , 2005 .

[76]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  INTERNET USES AND GRATIFICATIONS: A Structural Equation Model of Interactive Advertising , 2005 .

[77]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  P. Brockman,et al.  Commonality in Liquidity: Evidence from an Order-Driven Market Structure , 2002 .

[79]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[80]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward The Site II: New Information , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[81]  Dara V. O'Neil Analysis of Internet Users’ Level of Online Privacy Concerns , 2001 .

[82]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[83]  T. Harford,et al.  Drinking norms versus drinking behavior. , 1984, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.