Displacement capacity of masonry buildings as a basis for the assessment of behavior factor: an experimental study

The results of shaking table tests of a series of 1:5 scale masonry building models have been used for the assessment of values of structural behavior factor q for masonry structures, seismic force reduction factors proposed for the calculation of design seismic loads by Eurocode 8, European standard for the design of structures for earthquake resistance. Six models have been tested, representing prototype buildings of two different structural configurations and built with two different types of masonry materials. The study indicated that the reduction of seismic forces for the design depends not only on the type of masonry construction system, but also on structural configuration and mechanical characteristics of masonry materials. It has been also shown that besides displacement and energy dissipation capacity, damage limitation requirement should be taken into account when evaluating the values of behavior factor. On the basis of analysis of experimental results a conclusion can be made, that the values at the upper limit of the proposed range of values of structural behavior factor q for unreinforced and confined masonry construction systems are adequate, if pushover methods are used and the calculated global ductility of the structure is compared with the displacement demand. In the case where elastic analysis methods are used and significant overstrength is expected, the proposed values are conservative. However, additional research and parametric studies are needed to propose the modifications.

[1]  Miha Tomaževič,et al.  Verification of seismic resistance of confined masonry buildings , 1997 .

[2]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[3]  G. W. Housner,et al.  Behavior of Structures During Earthquakes , 1959 .

[4]  Richard N. White,et al.  Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques , 1999 .

[5]  Claudio Modena,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the ductility of a reduced- scale reinforced masonry building , 2001 .

[6]  Miha Tomaževič,et al.  Dynamic modelling of masonry buildings: Storey mechanism model as a simple alternative , 1987 .

[7]  Atilla Ötes,et al.  Zum Tragverhalten von Mauerwerksbauten unter Erdbebenbelastung , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings , 1992 .

[9]  Claudio Modena,et al.  Estimation of load reduction factors for clay masonry walls , 2009 .

[10]  H. Langhaar Dimensional analysis and theory of models , 1951 .

[11]  Miha TomaževičM. Tomaževič,et al.  Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experienceThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on Masonry. , 2007 .

[12]  D. Benedetti,et al.  Shaking table tests on 24 simple masonry buildings , 1998 .

[13]  Polona Weiss,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Plain‐ and Reinforced‐Masonry Buildings , 1994 .

[14]  Harry G. Harris,et al.  Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques, Second Edition , 1999 .

[15]  Amjad Naseer Performance Behavior of Confined Brick Masonry Buildings under Seismic Demand , 2009 .

[16]  Miha Tomaževič,et al.  Some aspects of testing small-scale masonry building models on simple earthquake simulators , 1992 .