State Discrimination With Post-Measurement Information

We introduce a new state discrimination problem in which we are given additional information about the state after the measurement, or more generally, after a quantum memory bound applies. The following special case plays an important role in quantum cryptographic protocols in the bounded storage model: Given a string x encoded in an unknown basis chosen from a set of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs), you may perform any measurement, but then store at most q qubits of quantum information, and an unlimited amount of classical information. Later on, you learn which basis was used. How well can you compute a function f(x) of x, given the initial measurement outcome, the q qubits, and the additional basis information? We first show a lower bound on the success probability for any balanced function, and any number of mutually unbiased bases, beating the naive strategy of simply guessing the basis. We then show that for two bases, any Boolean function f(x) can be computed perfectly if you are allowed to store just a single qubit, independent of the number of possible input strings x. However, we show how to construct three bases, such that you need to store all qubits in order to compute f(x) perfectly. We then investigate how much advantage the additional basis information can give for a Boolean function. To this end, we prove optimal bounds for the success probability for the AND and the XOR function for up to three mutually unbiased bases. Our result shows that the gap in success probability can be maximal: without the basis information, you can never do better than guessing the basis, but with this information, you can compute f(x) perfectly. We also give an example where the extra information does not give any advantage at all.

[1]  János A. Bergou,et al.  Discrimination of quantum states , 2010 .

[2]  A. Holevo Statistical decision theory for quantum systems , 1973 .

[3]  D. Mayers The Trouble with Quantum Bit Commitment , 1996, quant-ph/9603015.

[4]  A. Winter,et al.  Randomizing Quantum States: Constructions and Applications , 2003, quant-ph/0307104.

[5]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  Locking with three mutually unbiased bases , 2006 .

[6]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  The mean king's problem: Prime degrees of freedom , 2001, quant-ph/0101134.

[7]  William K. Wootters,et al.  A ‘Pretty Good’ Measurement for Distinguishing Quantum States , 1994 .

[8]  Masato Koashi,et al.  Operations that do not disturb partially known quantum states , 2002 .

[9]  Mark Hillery,et al.  Quantum filtering and discrimination between sets of Boolean functions. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[10]  R. Werner,et al.  Reexamination of quantum bit commitment: The possible and the impossible , 2006, quant-ph/0605224.

[11]  S. Barnett,et al.  Minimum-error discrimination between three mirror-symmetric states , 2002, quant-ph/0201074.

[12]  Mark Hillery,et al.  Optimal unambiguous filtering of a quantum state : An instance in mixed state discrimination , 2005 .

[13]  O. Bratteli Operator Algebras And Quantum Statistical Mechanics , 1979 .

[14]  S. Wehner,et al.  Entropic uncertainty relations and locking: tight bounds for mutually unbiased bases , 2006, quant-ph/0606244.

[15]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Designing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  W. Wootters,et al.  Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements , 1989 .

[17]  C. Batty OPERATOR ALGEBRAS AND QUANTUM STATISTICAL MECHANICS 1: C*‐ and W*‐Algebras. Symmetry Groups. Decomposition of States. , 1981 .

[18]  S. Barnett Minimum-error discrimination between multiply symmetric states , 2001 .

[19]  竹崎 正道 Theory of operator algebras , 2002 .

[20]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Locking classical correlations in quantum States. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[21]  M. Takesaki Theory of Operator Algebras II , 1979 .

[22]  H. Yuen Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Optimal detection of symmetric mixed quantum states , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[24]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[25]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[26]  L. Masanes Asymptotic violation of Bell inequalities and distillability. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[27]  Ivan Damgård,et al.  Cryptography in the bounded quantum-storage model , 2005, IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Theory and Practice in Information-Theoretic Security, 2005..

[28]  C. Mochon Family of generalized 'pretty good' measurements and the minimal-error pure-state discrimination problems for which they are optimal , 2005, quant-ph/0506061.

[29]  Hoi-Kwong Lo,et al.  Is Quantum Bit Commitment Really Possible? , 1996, ArXiv.

[30]  P. Oscar Boykin,et al.  A New Proof for the Existence of Mutually Unbiased Bases , 2002, Algorithmica.

[31]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory , 1975, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[32]  Results in Optimal Discrimination , 2004, quant-ph/0410228.

[33]  Yonina C. Eldar A semidefinite programming approach to optimal unambiguous discrimination of quantumstates , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[34]  A. Klappenecker,et al.  New Tales of the Mean King , 2005, quant-ph/0502138.

[35]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  On quantum detection and the square-root measurement , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[36]  M. Jafarizadeh,et al.  Optimal unambiguous discrimination of quantum states , 2007, 0708.2323.

[37]  Conclusive quantum state classification , 2006, quant-ph/0605127.

[38]  Masashi Ban,et al.  Optimum measurements for discrimination among symmetric quantum states and parameter estimation , 1997 .

[39]  K. Hunter Measurement does not always aid state discrimination , 2002, quant-ph/0211148.

[40]  Pawel Wocjan,et al.  New construction of mutually unbiased bases in square dimensions , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[41]  Mark Hillery,et al.  Quantum-state filtering applied to the discrimination of Boolean functions , 2005, quant-ph/0507092.