Using food web dominator trees to catch secondary extinctions in action

In ecosystems, a single extinction event can give rise to multiple ‘secondary’ extinctions. Conservation effort would benefit from tools that help forecast the consequences of species removal. One such tool is the dominator tree, a graph-theoretic algorithm that when applied to food webs unfolds their complex architecture, yielding a simpler topology made of linear pathways that are essential for energy delivery. Each species along these chains is responsible for passing energy to the taxa that follow it and, as such, it is indispensable for their survival. To assess the predictive potential of the dominator tree, we compare its predictions with the effects that followed the collapse of the capelin (Mallotus villosus) in the Barents Sea ecosystem. To this end, we first compiled a food web for this ecosystem, then we built the corresponding dominator tree and, finally, we observed whether model predictions matched the empirical observations. This analysis shows the potential and the drawbacks of the dominator trees as a tool for understanding the causes and consequences of extinctions in food webs.

[1]  Tomas Jonsson,et al.  Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs , 2000 .

[2]  J. Hamre Biodiversity and exploitation of the main fish stocks in the Norwegian - Barents Sea ecosystem , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[3]  Patrick Lehodey,et al.  Climate forcing, food web structure, and community dynamics in pelagic marine ecosystems , 2005 .

[4]  C. N. Spencer,et al.  SHRIMP STOCKING, SALMON COLLAPSE, AND EAGLE DISPLACEMENT , 1991 .

[5]  R. Solé,et al.  Topological properties of food webs: from real data to community assembly models Oikos 102 , 2003 .

[6]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[7]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  A fast algorithm for finding dominators in a flowgraph , 1979, TOPL.

[8]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[9]  D. Tilman Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[10]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Network structure and robustness of marine food webs , 2004 .

[11]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[12]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Who dominates whom in the ecosystem? Energy flow bottlenecks and cascading extinctions. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[14]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Functional links and robustness in food webs , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools , 1986, Addison-Wesley series in computer science / World student series edition.

[17]  W. Budgell,et al.  Joint PINRO/IMR report on the state of the Barents Sea ecosystem 2005/ 2006 , 2006 .

[18]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[19]  R. Barrett,et al.  The diets of common and Brünnich's guillemots Uria aalge and U. lomvia in the Barents Sea region , 1997 .

[20]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  S. Allesina,et al.  Secondary extinctions in ecological networks: Bottlenecks unveiled , 2006 .

[22]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Food webs robustness to biodiversity loss: the roles of connectance, expansibility and degree distribution. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  R. Barrett Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica and common guillemot Uria aalge chick diet and growth as indicators of fish stocks in the Barents Sea , 2002 .

[24]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[25]  D. Tilman,et al.  Species loss and ecosystem functioning : effects of species identity and community composition , 1998 .

[26]  V. Kaitala,et al.  A General Theory of Environmental Noise in Ecological Food Webs , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[27]  A. Dolgov The role of capelin (Mallotus villosus) in the foodweb of the Barents Sea , 2002 .

[28]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Competition among fishermen and fish causes the collapse of Barents Sea capelin. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.