1D joint multi‐offset inversion of time‐domain marine controlled source electromagnetic data

The accurate estimation of sub-seafloor resistivity features from marine controlled source electromagnetic data using inverse modelling is hindered due to the limitations of the inversion routines. The most commonly used one-dimensional inversion techniques for resolving subsurface resistivity structures are gradient-based methods, namely Occam and Marquardt. The first approach relies on the smoothness of the model and is recommended when there are no sharp resistivity boundaries. The Marquardt routine is relevant for many electromagnetic applications with sharp resistivity contrasts but subject to the appropriate choice of a starting model. In this paper, we explore the ability of different 1D inversion schemes to derive sub-seafloor resistivity structures from time domain marine controlled source electromagnetic data measured along an 8-km-long profile in the German North Sea. Seismic reflection data reveal a dipping shallow amplitude anomaly that was the target of the controleld source electromagnetic survey. We tested four inversion schemes to find suitable starting models for the final Marquardt inversion. In this respect, as a first scenario, Occam inversion results are considered a starting model for the subsequent Marquardt inversion (Occam–Marquardt). As a second scenario, we employ a global method called Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis and sequentially incorporate it with Marquardt inversion. The third approach corresponds to Marquardt inversion introducing lateral constraints. Finally, we include the lateral constraints in Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis optimization, and the results are sequentially utilized by Marquardt inversion. Occam–Marquardt may provide accurate estimation of the subsurface features, but it is dependent on the appropriate conversion of different multi-layered Occam model to an acceptable starting model for Marquardt inversion, which is not straightforward. Employing parameter spaces, the Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis approach can be pertinent to determine Marquardt a priori information; nevertheless, the uncertainties in Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis optimization will introduce some inaccuracies in Marquardt inversion results. Laterally constrained Marquardt may be promising to resolve sub-seafloor features, but it is not stable if there are significant lateral changes of the sub-seafloor structure due to the dependence of the method to the starting model. Including the lateral constraints in Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis approach allows for faster convergence of the routine with consistent results, furnishing more accurate estimation of a priori models for the subsequent Marquardt inversion.

[1]  David L. Alumbaugh,et al.  Robust and accelerated Bayesian inversion of marine controlled-source electromagnetic data using parallel tempering , 2013 .

[2]  G. Ramillien Genetic algorithms for geophysical parameter inversion from altimeter data , 2001 .

[3]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[4]  B. Minsley A trans-dimensional Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for model assessment using frequency-domain electromagnetic data , 2011 .

[5]  A. C. Hinnell,et al.  Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion , 2010 .

[6]  M. Moorkamp,et al.  Joint inversion of teleseismic receiver functions and magnetotelluric data using a genetic algorithm: Are seismic velocities and electrical conductivities compatible? , 2007 .

[7]  Fernando A. Monteiro Santos,et al.  1-D laterally constrained inversion of EM34 profiling data , 2004 .

[8]  J. P. Morten,et al.  The marine controlled-source electromagnetic method in shallow water , 2013 .

[9]  J. A. Vrugt,et al.  Two-dimensional probabilistic inversion of plane-wave electromagnetic data: Methodology, model constraints and joint inversion with electrical resistivity data , 2014, 1701.02540.

[10]  S. Kreiter,et al.  An east–west‐trending Quaternary tunnel valley in the south‐eastern North Sea and its seismic–sedimentological interpretation , 2012 .

[11]  C. Scholl 11. Resolving an Onshore Gas-Hydrate Layer with Long-Offset Transient Electromagnetics (LOTEM) , 2010 .

[12]  Kerry Key,et al.  1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers , 2009 .

[13]  Chester J. Weiss The fallacy of the “shallow-water problem” in marine CSEM exploration , 2007 .

[14]  Evert Slob,et al.  Joint full-waveform analysis of off-ground zero-offset ground penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction synthetic data for estimating soil electrical properties , 2010 .

[15]  P. Weidelt,et al.  Guided waves in marine CSEM , 2007 .

[16]  Stan E. Dosso,et al.  Trans‐dimensional Bayesian inversion of controlled‐source electromagnetic data in the German North Sea , 2015 .

[17]  Seokhoon Oh,et al.  Geostatistical approach to bayesian inversion of geophysical data: Markov chain Monte Carlo method , 2001 .

[18]  Fayçal Rejiba,et al.  1D single-site and laterally constrained inversion of multifrequency and multicomponent ground-based electromagnetic induction data — Application to the investigation of a near-surface clayey overburden , 2012 .

[19]  J. A. Vrugt,et al.  Distributed Soil Moisture from Crosshole Ground‐Penetrating Radar Travel Times using Stochastic Inversion , 2013, 1701.01634.

[20]  S. Constable Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration , 2010 .

[21]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[22]  M. Menvielle,et al.  Thin-sheet electromagnetic inversion modeling using Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) algorithm , 2002 .

[23]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[24]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applications , 2010 .

[25]  R. N. Edwards On the resource evaluation of marine gas hydrate deposits using sea‐floor transient electric dipole‐dipole methods , 1997 .

[26]  Esben Auken,et al.  Laterally constrained inversion of helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic data , 2009 .

[27]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[28]  D. Connell,et al.  A numerical comparison of time and frequency‐domain marine electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration in shallow water , 2013 .

[29]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  High‐dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple‐try DREAM(ZS) and high‐performance computing , 2012 .

[30]  Y. Rubin,et al.  A Bayesian model for gas saturation estimation using marine seismic AVA and CSEM data , 2007 .

[31]  F. A. Monteiro Santos,et al.  2-Dimensional soil and vadose-zone representation using an EM38 and EM34 and a laterally constrained inversion model , 2009 .

[32]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Quasi-3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion , 2008 .

[33]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .