CYP3A phenotyping approach to predict systemic exposure to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND Gefitinib is an orally active inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) with activity in non-small-cell lung cancer. The response to gefitinib is variable, possibly because of interindividual variation in the activity of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), the principal enzyme that metabolizes gefitinib. We prospectively assessed the influence of CYP3A activity on gefitinib disposition and toxicity. METHODS Twenty-seven patients with advanced cancer were treated with daily oral gefitinib at 250 mg (n = 13) or 500 mg (n = 14) for 28 days. Concentration-time profiles of midazolam and geftinib were constructed based on measurement of their concentration in serial blood samples using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy. CYP3A activity was determined at baseline by assessment of midazolam apparent oral clearance. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed for a period of 28 days, and population modeling was performed using NONMEM software. A structural pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe the concentration-time profiles of unbound and total gefitinib plasma concentrations, and patient-specific covariates were added to the model to account for unexplained interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Gefitinib pharmacokinetics exhibited wide interindividual variability (interindividual variability on total and unbound gefitinib apparent oral clearance was 79% and 74%, respectively). Midazolam clearance (mean = 40 L/h, range = 10-111) was highly correlated with that of total and unbound gefitinib (R2 = .60 and R2 = .68, respectively) and with steady-state plasma trough concentrations of gefitinib (R2 = .58 and R2 = .60, respectively), and it accounted for approximately 40% of interindividual variability in gefitinib clearance in the pharmacokinetic model. Both total and unbound gefitinib steady-state plasma trough concentrations were associated with the development of diarrhea (P<.05), but not skin rash. At a dose of 250 mg gefitinib, 11 of 13 patients achieved steady-state plasma trough concentrations above the IC50 for inhibition of mutant EGFR in vitro (0.015 microM), but only one achieved a steady-state plasma trough concentration above the IC50 for inhibition of wild-type EGFR (0.1 microM). CONCLUSIONS As an in vivo phenotypic probe of CYP3A, midazolam oral clearance may have utility for prediction of gefitinib exposure and dose selection. A pharmacokinetic model incorporating this indicator of CYP3A activity has potential for optimization of treatment with gefitinib and other TK inhibitors that are metabolized in a similar manner.

[1]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Comparison of stepwise covariate model building strategies in population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis , 2002, AAPS PharmSci.

[2]  A. Jimeno,et al.  Evaluation of gefitinib biological effects in patients with solid tumors amenable to sequential biopsies-Final results. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Binding of gefitinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase, to plasma proteins and blood cells: in vitro and in cancer patients , 2006, Investigational New Drugs.

[4]  E. Raymond,et al.  Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Radtke,et al.  Lack of effect of ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A inhibition on sorafenib clinical pharmacokinetics , 2006, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[6]  B. LaFleur,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of the clinical and biological effects of two dose levels of gefitinib in patients with recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Kevin Carroll,et al.  Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) , 2005, The Lancet.

[8]  P. Jänne,et al.  Selecting patients for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor treatment: A FISH story or a tale of mutations? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  P. Zbinden,et al.  METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION OF IMATINIB MESYLATE IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS , 2005, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[10]  R. Perez-soler,et al.  Cutaneous adverse effects with HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: is there a silver lining? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Lesley Seymour,et al.  Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Renato Martins,et al.  Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  B. Lum,et al.  A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for erlotinib (E), a small molecule inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) , 2005 .

[14]  P. Jänne,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for treatment and tumor biology. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  A. Jimeno,et al.  Specific method for determination of gefitinib in human plasma, mouse plasma and tissues using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[16]  G. S. Miles,et al.  Cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism of gefitinib , 2005, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[17]  M. Ranson,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Gefitinib with Rifampicin, Itraconazole and Metoprolol , 2005, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[18]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  An Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Intron 1 Polymorphism Mediates Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors , 2004, Cancer Research.

[19]  H. Swaisland,et al.  Metabolic disposition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in rat, dog and man , 2004, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[20]  C. Clarke,et al.  CYP3A5 Genotype and Midazolam Clearance in Australian Patients Receiving Chemotherapy , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  G. Kéri,et al.  High-affinity interaction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with the ABCG2 multidrug transporter. , 2004, Molecular pharmacology.

[22]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Pazdur,et al.  United States Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval Summary , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  Mark M. Roden,et al.  Interrelationship Between Substrates and Inhibitors of Human CYP3A and P-Glycoprotein , 1999, Pharmaceutical Research.

[25]  David Cella,et al.  Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[26]  Masahiro Fukuoka,et al.  Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected]. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Fukuoka,et al.  Phase I pharmacokinetic trial of the selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) in Japanese patients with solid malignant tumors. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  A. Harris,et al.  Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Roy S Herbst,et al.  Selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 is generally well-tolerated and has activity in non-small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors: results of a phase I trial. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  J. Verweij,et al.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea , 2002, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[31]  M. Kris,et al.  ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors: results of a phase I trial. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  E N Jonsson,et al.  Xpose--an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[33]  D. Shen,et al.  First‐pass metabolism of midazolam by the human intestine , 1996, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[34]  D. Shen,et al.  Oral first‐pass elimination of midazolam involves both gastrointestinal and hepatic CYP3A‐mediated metabolism , 1996, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[35]  C. Wandel,et al.  Midazolam is metabolized by at least three different cytochrome P450 enzymes. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[36]  T. Kronbach,et al.  Oxidation of midazolam and triazolam by human liver cytochrome P450IIIA4. , 1989, Molecular pharmacology.