A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF FREEWAY SPEED AND HEADWAY DATA

The knowledge of speed and head way distributions is essent ial in m icroscopic traffic flow studies because speed an d headway are both fundamental microscopic characteristics of traffic flow. For microscopic simulation models, one key process is the generation of entry vehicle speeds and vehicle arrival times. It is helpful to find desirable mathematical distributions to m odel individual speed and headway values, because the individual vehicle speed and arrival tim e in microscopic simulations are usu ally generated based on som e form of mathematical models. Traditionally, distributions for speed and headway are investigated separately and independent of each other. However, this traditional approach ignores the possible dependence between speed and headway. To address this issue, the research pr esents a m ethodology to construct bivariate distributions to describe the characteri stics of speed and headway. Based on the investigation of freeway speed and headway da ta measured from the loop detector data on IH-35 in Austin, it is shown that there exists a weak dependence betw een speed and headway. The research first proposes skew-t m ixture models to capture the he terogeneity in speed distribution. Finite m ixture of skew-t distributions can significantly im prove the goodness of fit of speed data. To develop a bivariate distribut ion to capture the dependence and describe the characteristics of speed and headway, this study proposes a

[1]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Headway distribution modeling with regard to traffic status , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[2]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Analysis of Freeway Travel Time Variability Using Bluetooth Detection , 2011 .

[3]  Fan Ye,et al.  Vehicle Type–Specific Headway Analysis Using Freeway Traffic Data , 2009 .

[4]  Tsung I. Lin,et al.  Robust mixture modeling using multivariate skew t distributions , 2010, Stat. Comput..

[5]  Tsutomu T. Takeuchi,et al.  Constructing a bivariate distribution function with given marginals and correlation: application to the galaxy luminosity function , 2010, 1004.0439.

[6]  Jack C. Lee,et al.  Robust mixture modeling using the skew t distribution , 2007, Stat. Comput..

[7]  David Shinar,et al.  Minimum and Comfortable Driving Headways: Reality versus Perception , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[8]  J R McLean OBSERVED SPEED DISTRIBUTIONS AND RURAL ROAD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS , 1979 .

[9]  Zhirui Ye,et al.  Estimation of Large Truck Volume Using Single Loop Detector Data , 2008 .

[10]  C. Genest,et al.  Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Copula Modeling but Were Afraid to Ask , 2007 .

[11]  Yajie Zou,et al.  Use of Skew-Normal and Skew-t Distributions for Mixture Modeling of Freeway Speed Data , 2011 .

[12]  Yajie Zou,et al.  Application of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models with varying weight parameters for vehicle crash data analysis. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  R. Luttinen STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF VEHICLE TIME HEADWAYS , 1992 .

[14]  Mir M. Ali,et al.  A class of bivariate distri-butions including the bivariate logistic , 1978 .

[15]  A Heino,et al.  Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[16]  M. Sklar Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[17]  Victor H. Lachos,et al.  Robust mixture modeling based on scale mixtures of skew-normal distributions , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[18]  Frank A Haight,et al.  A PRACTICAL METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF VEHICULAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENTS , 1962 .

[19]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  New Estimation Technique for Vehicle-Type-Specific Headway Distributions , 1998 .

[20]  H J Leong,et al.  The distribution and trend of free speeds on two lane two way rural highways in New South Wales , 1968 .

[21]  R T Luttinen Properties of Cowan’s M3 Headway Distribution , 1999 .

[22]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Copula-Based Approach to Accommodate Residential Self-Selection Effects in Travel Behavior Modeling , 2009 .

[23]  A. Azzalini A class of distributions which includes the normal ones , 1985 .

[24]  W. R. Schucany,et al.  Correlation structure in Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions , 1978 .

[25]  Zhirui Ye,et al.  Unscented Kalman Filter Method for Speed Estimation Using Single Loop Detector Data , 2006 .

[26]  V. Singh,et al.  Bivariate Flood Frequency Analysis Using the Copula Method , 2006 .

[27]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[28]  Gérard Govaert,et al.  Assessing a Mixture Model for Clustering with the Integrated Completed Likelihood , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[29]  S. Kotz,et al.  Modifications of the Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions. A tough hill to climb , 1999 .

[30]  Frank A. Haight,et al.  Mathematical Theories of Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[31]  E. Gumbel Bivariate Exponential Distributions , 1960 .

[32]  Christian Genest,et al.  Copules archimédiennes et families de lois bidimensionnelles dont les marges sont données , 1986 .

[33]  A. Azzalini,et al.  Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t‐distribution , 2003, 0911.2342.

[34]  Richard Cowan,et al.  Useful headway models , 1975 .

[35]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Determinants of following headway in congested traffic , 2009 .

[36]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  On some generalized farlie-gumbel-morgenstern distributions-II regression, correlation and further generalizations , 1977 .

[37]  Heng Wei,et al.  Examining Headway Distribution Models with Urban Freeway Loop Event Data , 2007 .

[38]  Paul Wasielewski Car-Following Headways on Freeways Interpreted by the Semi-Poisson Headway Distribution Model , 1979 .

[39]  E. Erdem,et al.  Comparison of bivariate distribution construction approaches for analysing wind speed and direction data , 2011 .

[40]  D. L. Gerlough,et al.  Traffic flow theory : a monograph , 1975 .

[41]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Characterization of Congestion Based on Speed Distribution: A Statistical Approach Using Gaussian Mixture Model , 2005 .

[42]  Gunky Kim,et al.  Comparison of semiparametric and parametric methods for estimating copulas , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[43]  Partha Pratim Dey,et al.  Desired Time Gap and Time Headway in Steady-State Car-Following on Two-Lane Roads , 2009 .

[44]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Bayesian mixture modeling approach to account for heterogeneity in speed data , 2010 .

[45]  Jungwook Jun Understanding the variability of speed distributions under mixed traffic conditions caused by holiday traffic , 2010 .

[46]  Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter,et al.  Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models , 2006 .

[47]  P. Dey,et al.  Speed Distribution Curves under Mixed Traffic Conditions , 2006 .