The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation

Nutrient limitation (mostly N or P) is a driving force in ecosystem development. Current techniques to determine the nature of nutrient limitation use laborious fertilization experiments. It was hypothesized that the N:P ratio of'the vegetation directly indicates the nature of nutrient limitation on a community level (N vs. P limitation). This hypothesis was tested by reviewing data on fertilization studies in a variety of European freshwater wetland ecosystems (bogs, fens, wet heathlands, dune slacks, wet grasslands). In a subset of the data (dune slacks) between-site intraspecific variation and within-site interspecific variation in nutrient content and N:P ratio was studied in five plant species. A review of 40 fertilization studies reveals that an N:P ratio >16 indicates P limitation on a community level, while an N:P ratio < 14 is indicative of N limitation. At N:P ratios between 14 and 16, either N or P can be limiting or plant growth is colimited by N and P together. In only one out of 40 fertilization studies, the N:P ratio gave a false indication of the nature of nutrient limitation. Measuring the N:P ratio of the vegetation is a simple and cheap alternative to fertilization studies. The method can only be used under conditions where either N or P controls plant growth. The dataset contains a large variety of vegetation types and plant species, and 11 I of the 40 sites were near-monocultures. This suggests that interspecific differences in critical N:P ratios among species may be insignificant. However, a rigorous test of this hypothesis is required. A survey in 18 dune slacks showed large within-site variation in N:P ratio among five species (Calamagrostis epigejos, Phragmites australis, Lycopus europaeus, Mentha aquatica and Eupatorium cannabinum). The N:P ratios of the five species suggested that within plant communities species can be differentially limited by N or P. Moreover, species with an N:P ratio that suggested P-limitation were found at sites where N controlled community biomass production, and vice versa. Between-site intraspecific variation in N and P contents and N:P ratios was also large, and about equal for the five species. This illustrates the plasticity of plant species with respect to N and P contents, probably in response to differences in N and P supply ratios. The vegetation N:P ratio is of diagnostic value and its use may increase our understanding of numerous facets of physiological, population, community and ecosystem ecology.

[1]  M. Oomes Restoration of wet grasslands: case study , 1995 .

[2]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Nutrient enrichment of freshwater wetlands , 1993 .

[3]  H. Olff On the mechanisms of vegetation succession , 1992 .

[4]  J. Downing,et al.  The nitrogen : phosphorus relationship in lakes , 1992 .

[5]  R. Aerts,et al.  Growth-Limiting Nutrients in Sphagnum-Dominated Bogs Subject to Low and High Atmospheric Nitrogen Supply , 1992 .

[6]  M. Proctor,et al.  Limiting nutrients in acid-mire vegetation: peat and plant analyses and experiments on plant responses to added nutrients , 1991 .

[7]  James B. Grace,et al.  Perspectives on Plant Competition , 1991 .

[8]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Control of plant growth by nitrogen and phosphorus in mesotrophic fens , 1991 .

[9]  Robert W. Howarth,et al.  Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? , 1991 .

[10]  J. Morris,et al.  Effects of Nitrogen Loading on Wetland Ecosystems with Particular Reference to Atmospheric Deposition , 1991 .

[11]  F. Berendse,et al.  Competition and nutrient availability in heathland and grassland ecosystems , 1990 .

[12]  M. L. H. Boyer,et al.  VEGETATION PATTERNS IN SPRING-FED CALCAREOUS FENS: CALCITE PRECIPITATION AND CONSTRAINTS ON FERTILITY , 1989 .

[13]  M. Ohlson Variation in tissue element concentration in mire plants over a range of sites , 1988 .

[14]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  The Nature of Nutrient Limitation in Plant Communities , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[15]  J. Vermeer The effect of nutrient addition and lowering of the water table on shoot biomass and species composition of a wet grassland community (Cirsio-Molinietum Siss. et de Vries, 1942) , 1986 .

[16]  J. Vermeer The effect of nutrients on shoot biomass and species composition of wetland and hayfield communities. , 1986 .

[17]  D. Tilman The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[18]  H. Blume,et al.  Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (Ed., 1982): Methods of soil analysis; 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2. Aufl. 1184 S., American Soc. of Agronomy (Publ.), Madison, Wisconsin, USA, gebunden 36 Dollar. , 1985 .

[19]  J. Melillo,et al.  Nutrient Budgets of Marsh Plants: Efficiency Concepts and Relation to Availability , 1984 .

[20]  Val H. Smith,et al.  The nitrogen and phosphorus dependence of algal biomass in lakes: An empirical and theoretical analysis1 , 1982 .

[21]  A. Page Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. , 1982 .

[22]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[23]  G. Rhee Effects of N:P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition, and nitrate uptake 1 , 1978 .

[24]  K. Loach Relations Between Soil Nutrients and Vegetation in Wet-Heaths: II. Nutrient Uptake by the Major Species in the Field and in Controlled Conditions , 1968 .

[25]  F. A. Richards,et al.  The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water , 1963 .

[26]  W. L. Nelson,et al.  Soil Fertility and Fertilizers , 1957 .

[27]  C. Tamm Some Observations on the Nutrient Turn-Over in a Bog Community Dominated by Eriophorum vaginatum L. , 1954 .

[28]  Justus von Liebig,et al.  Chemistry in Its Application to Agriculture and Physiology , 1842, London and Edinburgh Monthly Journal of Medical Science.